• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Sir_Ovens
Reaction score
8,891

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Could I get your opinion on this thread?
    Hi, I'm a new user, but I've been lurking (without an account) for a few years now. Reading a few SCP articles in relatively quick succession (Decibelles' ...Like Clockwork series, Ori's Proposal, Eastward of Eden, and altoid-clef, with a few in between) finally encouraged me to start taking matters into my own hands - and one of the ways I'm doing that is joining this site. I was planning on making my first post a CRT for said verse, but, well, you know what's going on. So, instead, I came to ask permission to comment on the referenced thread, and I guess congratulate you for the work you've done on the wiki - not just you, of course.

    Reasoning for commenting on said the thread (do I need this part? I'm adding it anyway): Who is He? was deleted - as Bambu points out it's AI generated; and such content is banned on that wiki. A Journey Through the Afterlife was also deleted, but I don't know why - it's not showing up on the deletions thread, unless I'm being an idiot. The deletions thread also serves as a good counterexample for those who claim there's no oversight or whatever - it was only created on the 18th of March, but it has 8 pages full of deletions. BAROQUE was clearly written - at least in part - to demonstrate that the Department of Unreality was not, in fact, Tier 0. And indeed, it shouldn't be; WOG states that SCP-7909 - the article that makes the Department big 0 - was intended to take place in a different continuity from "regular" Unreality. As such, it is not featured on the Unreality hub, which only houses articles consistent with each other - thus, if by some miracle SCP stuff doesn't get removed we should probably only use articles on that hub. Consider it from Fishish's perspective; some guy writes an article that goes against the core concepts of the Department you helped create - it explains unreality, and gives the Dept. members (other than Alex). (Remember the Department's members don't exist - so they aren't there.) Then another guy starts asking how powerful Alex is - whilst completely misunderstanding Alex and Unreality. Then you discover - either via simply searching for the Department of Unreality on some web browser, investigating why this guy was interested in how powerful Alex Thorley was, or something else - that some other guys had made this thing, claiming that Unreality was this really powerful thing - because of that first guy's article - whilst misnaming Alex, and depending on when Fishish read it, misgendering Alex too. With this in mind a reaction like BAROQUE makes perfect sense, at least to me. I have a lot more to say on this matter, but since I've only slept like 6 hours in the past 3 days, I'm really f-ing tired, so night night, I guess.
    Sir_Ovens
    Sir_Ovens
    I think most of these points have been said and the thread is more or less concluded but if you wanna add something go ahead you have my permission.
    Hi, could you please give your input on this? It's a simple calc application for an old feat.
    Can you take a look at this minor CRT? We only need 1 more staff input
    Hey can I get your input here appreciated 🙏
    Hello there! I’ve made a CRT regarding a massive upgrade for the shadow fight verse, and it is facing trouble getting inputs (for the past 4 months), can I have your input?
    If you have time, could you comment on this?

    We only need one more staff with voting rights to conclude this, so if you could check this out it'd be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
    2-C upgrade for Goten, Trunks, and Gotenks. I made another one myself and I’d like your vote on it, since the other admins so far agree.

    Can you look at this when you're free?

    Hello. Can you tell me what you think about it pls?
    Tearing jaw is Class 10 LS

    Super Variant Walker from The Walkind Dead Verse tear jaw of another super variant walker


    But because the bones of walkers (zombies) are more rotten than those of humans, I think is class 5 LS?

    And Daryl from The Walking Dead Verse could resist and struggle with this type of walker


    Do you agree that struggle and resist off to someone with class 5 lifting strenght is a class 1 or at least class 1 lifting strenght?
    Yo could you quickly check out this thread?
    We need 1 more staff approval
    Hello, I came across a semi-abandoned (or at least one that's on hiatus) staff thread and took the liberty of editing the Non-Standard Breathing page (here) to match the Underwater Breathing page. I made sure to match the different types of the Non-Standard Breathing page to match the ones in the Underwater Breathing such as the description for the type 1 of UB matching the one in NSB to avoid having to edit the different profiles to match the types if there were less or more than the ones in the UB page.

    Additionally, I added Underwater breathing to the possible uses to make it clear that Underwater breathing is a subtype of it so that we won't need to edit the profiles from UB to NSB. I also added examples to the NSB page to better match the UB page and changed the category of weaknesses to limitations since that was what was on the UB page before expanding on that.

    I know it's a staff thread but I wanted to take a bit of workload off you guys since you all might be busy and it didn't seem that difficult. Whether you accept it or not, or even come up with a better one, doesn't matter to me so long as it's resolved so you can focus on more important discussions without leaving unimportant ones unresolved.
    Could you please give your input in this thread?
    Hello. Can i get your feedback on this crt?
    Little help please, Sir
    Hi, could you rate this?

    Hello, can you please get your input to this thread? Thanks

    Hello. Could you rate these feats from Harry Potter? They are listed on the list, thank you

    Hi Ovens, can you check out this CRT? Ninjago don't get much attention from staff so your input would be cool
    Hey there Ovens, if you are free, can you take a look at this CRT?
    Whenever you have a spare moment, would you be willing to give input on this CRT? its not tier 1 or 2 stuff just powers and abilities that need to be evaluated. Thank you!

    Can you give your opinions for this CRT? Its mainly a profile revamp and the verse supporters have already agreed that its correct
    Sorry to bother you. If you have time, could you please evaluate this thread? Thank you in advance.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top