-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Suggestions for improvements (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
-
- Tags
- vs battles wiki
- 2,010
- 1,090
Before anything, why do you want to be able to remove CRTs?
- 10,505
- 5,289
For example, I want to change my profile name, but I don't have that option, wouldn't it be good to be able to join this option for wiki?
- 1,808
- 2,809
Profile name? Wait, I thought you were talking about thread names?
- 18,393
- 14,311
Oh, you want to change the profile name. Ya, this is not possible (unless you somehow change @Antvasima's opinion)
- 10,889
- 18,939
No, cos username here should match with the same username you have in the wiki.
- 1,808
- 2,809
Yeah, like Dread said. Most of the time, a profile name change should only be done if your fandom account and forums account don't have matching usernames.
- 10,505
- 5,289
for the simple reason that it is no longer useful and also avoids having the same CRTs
- 10,505
- 5,289
no, lol, I'm referring to the name of the profile, I made mine in a rush and didn't know how to work with the profile, right after I put the first name that came to mind, lol
- 18,393
- 14,311
No, this is an atrocious reason. Unless it is empty thread, and you accidentally create it, you can request thread moderator for CRT deletion. Otherwise, there is no reason to delete it.
Either giving this permission to each user by their own will lead to extreme outrageous consequences.
- 10,889
- 18,939
No, that could lead to every user being capable of removing their CRTs at will and that could end as either trolling or in case of anyone needing to check out old CRTs to get informed about certain topics or whatsoever
- 10,889
- 18,939
Then you could change your wiki username and after that ask a bureaucrat to change your username here accordingly, but name change in fandom can only do 1 time.
- 10,505
- 5,289
I understand
- 1,808
- 2,809
No, it just surprised me that you suddenly brought up your profile name, when we were having talks about threads.
But well, you'll have to ask Bureaucrats for that, and the most active one is Antvasima.
- 10,505
- 5,289
I think this option should be adhered to for moderators and administrators, delete old CRTs
- 18,393
- 14,311
The thread moderators got the permission, however it is infrequent to delete any CRTs due to its importance in the wiki.
- 1,755
- 5,266
Agree with this.
- 10,505
- 5,289
I will do that, thank you very much! And I'm sorry for anything there, lol
- 10,505
- 5,289
this
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 21,686
- 19,276
because I don't like them, of course.
- 2,010
- 1,090
- 18,393
- 14,311
- 165,348
- 72,617
- Thread starter
- #1,384
Heart emojis seem harmless, but not particularly necessary, as we already have the like function.
Anybody being able to delete their own threads would too easily cause problems for our wiki's and forum's organisation, and people constantly changing their own usernames would cause absolute chaos in recognising and finding each other.
Also, if somebody changes their Fandom username, there is a bug that recurrently automatically wipes out ALL comments to ALL of their wiki blog posts, so I strongly advise against it for members with several calculation blogs or similar.
Anybody being able to delete their own threads would too easily cause problems for our wiki's and forum's organisation, and people constantly changing their own usernames would cause absolute chaos in recognising and finding each other.
Also, if somebody changes their Fandom username, there is a bug that recurrently automatically wipes out ALL comments to ALL of their wiki blog posts, so I strongly advise against it for members with several calculation blogs or similar.
- 10,505
- 5,289
How do you become an admin or moderator on vsbttles?
Is it possible for a member like me to be an admin?
- 10,889
- 18,939
- 10,505
- 5,289
I understand, thank you.
- 10,505
- 5,289
well, I come to bring something that will benefit everyone, the option for us members to block people we don't like, (apart from moderators, administration, and the team) as toxic members, and such, I know that everyone has a person that they don't like in the wiki, that's why I'm proposing this, it would be nice not to have to see anything more of the person we hate or something like that, to avoid problems, but this function will have to report to the team, so as not to suffer from the person blocking anyone for reasons silly, anyway, I think this is a beautiful thing to bring on the wiki, like Facebook.
- 18,393
- 14,311
One argument against this suggestion could be that it could lead to a culture of avoidance and lack of accountability. If members are able to block other members that they don't like, they may be less likely to engage in healthy conflict resolution or address any issues they have with those individuals. This could also create a situation where certain individuals are isolated or ostracized from the community, which could be harmful and counterproductive.
Additionally, this suggestion could potentially be abused by members who may use it to block anyone who disagrees with them or who they perceive as a threat to their own status within the community. This could lead to the suppression of diverse viewpoints and the creation of echo chambers, rather than fostering a healthy and inclusive environment for dialogue and debate.
It may be more productive to focus on finding ways to encourage respectful and constructive communication within the community, rather than giving members the ability to block others. This could involve providing resources for conflict resolution, implementing rules and guidelines for respectful behavior, and enforcing consequences for those who consistently engage in toxic or disruptive behavior.
Therefore, I disagree with this.
Additionally, this suggestion could potentially be abused by members who may use it to block anyone who disagrees with them or who they perceive as a threat to their own status within the community. This could lead to the suppression of diverse viewpoints and the creation of echo chambers, rather than fostering a healthy and inclusive environment for dialogue and debate.
It may be more productive to focus on finding ways to encourage respectful and constructive communication within the community, rather than giving members the ability to block others. This could involve providing resources for conflict resolution, implementing rules and guidelines for respectful behavior, and enforcing consequences for those who consistently engage in toxic or disruptive behavior.
Therefore, I disagree with this.
- 18,393
- 14,311
I believe that creating a sandbox for this purpose could be a useful solution. This would allow us to make suggestions and offer assistance to the OP (Ant) without requiring constant updates to the original post. Additionally, this would provide a dedicated space for discussion and collaboration on the topic, potentially streamlining the process and making it more efficient.
Last edited:
- 165,348
- 72,617
- Thread starter
- #1,394
A list of firmly rejected previous suggestions likely wouldn't hurt.
Also, in addition to the reasons mentioned above for not accepting the latest suggestion here, it isn't good if we sweepingly ignore all valid content revision thread arguments from all of the members that we personally dislike, or even do not receive notifications from staff members.
Also, in addition to the reasons mentioned above for not accepting the latest suggestion here, it isn't good if we sweepingly ignore all valid content revision thread arguments from all of the members that we personally dislike, or even do not receive notifications from staff members.
- 10,505
- 5,289
could you help me with this from here?
There are days that I'm trying to log in with my account and I can't, is this normal to happen?
- 165,348
- 72,617
- Thread starter
- #1,396
It is probably a glitch in Fandom's system. I do not know what to do about it other than send a message to inform them about the problem, after first checking to see if the problem remains if you log in from another browser.
- 10,505
- 5,289
right bro
- 15,345
- 15,039
What on God's Green Earth is this ugly ass underlining?
My suggestion for improvement is removing whatever this underlining is
My suggestion for improvement is removing whatever this underlining is
- 1,808
- 2,809
Yeah, it seems that it has occurred again. This has already happened before and was removed in a day. The reasons for this occurring is unknown.What on God's Green Earth is this ugly ass underlining?
My suggestion for improvement is removing whatever this underlining is
This issue is also only prevalent in light mode.
