• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
10,294
17,328
Continuing from my previous thread.

Previous thread which got the High 4-C rating added.


Demon King’s and Supreme Diety’s High 4-C Rating.

The day has finally come to get this rating removed from the profiles, now I was someone who initially believed in the High 4-C rating for NNT, people like Mitch and Arc can vouch for that. But after constant self-debating and re-reading the entire chapter where the statement is said multiple times i slowly started to doubt this rating given the vagueness of it all, the final nail in the coffin for my support of the feat being usable on the wiki comes in the form of the creation feat standards set by the wiki.

It's directly stated that the creation of the object(s) in question needs to happen within a reasonably short timeframe for the whole result to apply to the Attack Potency

I’ve recently found out about this rule via a thread which my favorite female best friend @Arc7Kuroi made which got Kaguya’s ETSO rating removed because of it having zero stated or implied reasonable timeframe.

Now this is a problem for NNT’s rating since we aren’t given a timeframe for how long it took for the creation feat to happen, which is shown in the scan used to upgrade the verse. We’re given zero timeframe about the feat, nor are we given any implications about the timeframe being “reasonably short” from my knowledge. Which means this feat isn’t usable for AP scaling at all.

This would mean Demon King’s and Supreme Diety’s High 4-C would be completely removed from the profiles if NNT supporters can't provide a logically consistent and reasoned timeframe, if they can then the feat will be calc’d to gain the new value and have that added to the profiles.


Chaos’s High 4-C Rating.

This one is pretty simple, since Chaos gains his High 4-C rating via being quantitatively superior to both the Supreme Deity and Demon King. If both lose their High 4-C rating then Chaos would also lose it.

Now Chaos does have a feat of creating an assumed earth-sized planet, but just like the dimension creation feat, this feat doesn’t have a stated or implied timeframe at all, which means it can’t be applied onto his profile as AP for the same reason. Now if NNT supporters can provide a logically consistent and reasoned timeframe then the feat could be calc’d. But since Chaos would scale above the Supreme Diety’s dimension creation feat he’d have whatever value is gained from that feat, and the planet creation feat would be used as supporting evidence.

If both the planet creation and dimension creation feats get completely axed via having unknown timeframes then Chaos would either gain an unknown rating or would massively scale above the highest current rating in NNT (which is currently High 6-C)


Conclusions.



Demon King and Supreme Deity.

Both get their High 4-C ratings removed, and if a reasonable timeframe is found, the feat will be calc’d and that value would be added in replacement to the High 4-C value.

Chaos

Chaos gets his High 4-C rating removed for the same reason as DK and SD, he will also scale to the calc’d value if the timeframe is logically reasoned but if neither the planet creation feat nor the dimension creation feat have reasonable timeframes than Chaos will either gain a unknown rating or will scale to the highest rating for the verse.



Agree - CloverDragon03, DemonGodMitchAubin, GTsek, azontr, RandomGuy2345, KingTempest, Arc7Kuroi, NotoriouSoda, ByAsura, Zaratthustra, Makai64100,
LIFE_OF_KING, Damage3245, TheGreatJedi13, Maverick_Zero_X, Pain_to12, Planck69

Disagree - speedster352, Zezu1995 (Neutral on SD's and DK's ratings being removed), TheGreatJedi13

Neutral - MonkeyOfLife
 
Last edited:
I think the Wiki rules about creation feats are very strict, but if they're there, there's nothing to be done, I agree.
 
Though uh, I'd like to see the scan about Chaos creating a 5-B structure in an instant. That sounds substantial.
 
Yeah I went back and it never said in an instant, I thought it did, guess I was wrong

Well I obviously agree with the downgrade of the High 4-C rating as those are completely false

And by this logic, I guess Chaos loses his 5-B rating as well if someone can't prove it happened in an instant
 
How does this prove Chaos can create planet's in an instant?
They can create things instantly seperrate dimension, realms and etc Just Arthur’s mood was affected the entire world. Just his intention brought about the world not him working on making the planet.
 
They can create things instantly seperrate dimension, realms and etc Just Arthur’s mood was affected the entire world. Just his intention brought about the world not him working on making the planet.
You realize intentions have nothing to do with timeframes right?

All an intention is is a mental decision to commit to an action.

For example, I intend to graduate college. I will graduate college with a single intention (the intent to graduate). Yet I don’t graduate in an instant, it takes 4 years.

Also, as the original OP of the upgrade thread for this rating I entirely agree with my best buddy Deceived. Ngl I entirely upgraded NNT out of spite way back when.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top