- 10,241
- 17,181
Continuing from my previous thread.
The verse currently accepts levels of regeneration for a singular character that I heavily disagree with, and also accepts regeneration to be scalable between those of the same race of this character. I also disagree with this, I'll explain my reasoning for both in this thread right away.
Now I can’t say the same for his Low-Godly overtime, this rating has quite literally zero reasoning on his profile on why it’s present or accepted, zero satisfactory explanation and zero scans which prove that level. So it should be removed based on this alone if no one can provide actual scans/feats of regeneration on this level.
If that burden can’t be meant then it should be removed from his profile, but if it is met then it should stay on his profile. but also another problem i have with his Mid-High (not his Low-Godly since that’s rightfully described as overtime) regeneration is that it’s over an unknown amount of time from my knowledge, we have direct evidence of Fraudrin being able to regenerate from Mid-High levels of damage but we have no idea how long that took. Similar to his Low-Godly. Which is extremely pertinent to denote on the profile since regeneration that takes over a week to fully go into effect (as in, completely regenerate the person from that level of damage) isn’t considered as combat applicable. So if NNT supporters can’t give a timeframe either gained from direct statements or logically reasoned. it should be assumed non-combat applicable just like his Low-Godly (if that stays).
Agree - Greatsage13th, thetechmaster36, ByAsura (Agreed with removing Regeneration Scaling), Arnoldstone18, KingTempest, DemonGodMitchAubin, Kachon, Arc7Kuroi (Low-Godly and Regeneration Scaling)
Disagree - speedster352
Neutral - ByAsura (Doesn't care about Fraudrin's Mid-High or Low-Godly Regeneration), Majinere566, azontr, Arc7Kuroi (Mid-High Regeneration Timeframe)
The verse currently accepts levels of regeneration for a singular character that I heavily disagree with, and also accepts regeneration to be scalable between those of the same race of this character. I also disagree with this, I'll explain my reasoning for both in this thread right away.
Fraudrin’s Regeneration.
Fraudrin currently has (Mid, Low-Godly overtime) on his profile, now these levels are completely wrong, Mid level regeneration is a complete lowball of Fraudrin’s regeneration since he was able to regenerate from Hendrickson’s Acid Down which disintegrated his entire body, this is accepted as Mid-High (rightfully so) as shown in the Demon Physiology Blog.Now I can’t say the same for his Low-Godly overtime, this rating has quite literally zero reasoning on his profile on why it’s present or accepted, zero satisfactory explanation and zero scans which prove that level. So it should be removed based on this alone if no one can provide actual scans/feats of regeneration on this level.
If that burden can’t be meant then it should be removed from his profile, but if it is met then it should stay on his profile. but also another problem i have with his Mid-High (not his Low-Godly since that’s rightfully described as overtime) regeneration is that it’s over an unknown amount of time from my knowledge, we have direct evidence of Fraudrin being able to regenerate from Mid-High levels of damage but we have no idea how long that took. Similar to his Low-Godly. Which is extremely pertinent to denote on the profile since regeneration that takes over a week to fully go into effect (as in, completely regenerate the person from that level of damage) isn’t considered as combat applicable. So if NNT supporters can’t give a timeframe either gained from direct statements or logically reasoned. it should be assumed non-combat applicable just like his Low-Godly (if that stays).
Fraudrin’s Regeneration Scaling.
Another problem I found while looking over the profiles is that every single High-Level Demon within the series is assumed to have Mid-High regeneration scaling off of Fraudrin, now my problem with this is there’s zero evidence/explanation on the physiology page which shows or explains why high-level demons would scale to Fraudrin’s level of regen. If there’s evidence that proves it would be applicable to all high-level demons then i’m fine with it being present on the page, but if there isn’t any evidence for it and it’s just purely based off of assumptions then it should be removed from the page entirely.Conclusions.
Fraudrin Himself
- Fraudrin gets his Mid level regeneration removed without question and gets it replaced with Mid-High (Note - This has been changed to a possible rating after further debate)
- He gets his Low-Godly regeneration removed if NNT supporters can’t provide evidence on why it should stay.
- His Mid-High regeneration will be assumed non-combat applicable if NNT supporters can’t provide a valid timeframe for how long it took Fraudrin to regenerate from Acid Down.
Regeneration Scaling
- Mid-High should be removed from the demon physiology profile if NNT supporters can’t provide direct evidence of this type of scaling, but if they can logically reason why this would be applicable to every other high-level demons then the rating would be changed to a “possibly” instead of a concrete rating.
Agree - Greatsage13th, thetechmaster36, ByAsura (Agreed with removing Regeneration Scaling), Arnoldstone18, KingTempest, DemonGodMitchAubin, Kachon, Arc7Kuroi (Low-Godly and Regeneration Scaling)
Disagree - speedster352
Neutral - ByAsura (Doesn't care about Fraudrin's Mid-High or Low-Godly Regeneration), Majinere566, azontr, Arc7Kuroi (Mid-High Regeneration Timeframe)
Last edited:
