I'm gonna personally ask you that you use paragraphs going forward. Or try not to make so many points that are essentially the same, it really does make replying to your arguments that much more difficult whenever I'm reading a large clumped together wall of text, of which a lot of the points are simply reiterating previous points that cover the same topic.
Also the Demon Slayer Mark amp isn't accepted as 100x. Not sure where you got that from.
Also the Demon Slayer Mark amp isn't accepted as 100x. Not sure where you got that from.
And yes, I rechecked the thread. I said this:
Someone else: "Ruby FRA"
Me: "???? for what reasons? I responded to all of the points about Ruby with no response from any of the Ruby supporters"
That's not harassment. That's me trying to understand why someone decided to vote on the exact opposite point I just decided to defend, which I further defended myself within the same thread.
He was also accusing me of doing things that he himself did at an equal amount, that being NFL and nonstandard strategies, which is also further provided and directly addressed within the thread it happened in. While also calling me self-conceited as a response.
As for using my own AP values, I was reading the pages on the wiki, and I watched the show. I know what happens in the show, and I know where the calculation come from. Hence, I made a conclusion based on that. I have no idea why the entire rest of the community says otherwise, since it goes directly against what the show actually depicts.
TLDR he was essentially calling me an idiot who violated the Versus Thread Rules, which in fact I didn't do a single time.
Removing the context from my response will make my response look completely dismissive in a comment that was meant to throw barbs at me within a thread where reports happen, hence I assumed it was a counter-report, which is 100% entirely unjustified for all of the reasons I mentioned above. I personally believe that the context I provided shouldn't be removed from my comment for