• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

What's new Featured content New posts New media New media comments New profile posts Latest activity
V-King
EldemadeDityjon
Sorry for distributing can I get your input here 🙏

vsbattles.com

Eminence in Shadow Revisions - Part 1

I have two things to address this Common Abilities for Shadow Garden Members Here is the Sandbox for Shadow Garden members common abilities. New scaling chain and Updating the current AP & Durability. I'm going with Freiren Characters approach where Physical sts is Seperated with magic...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
That_moron2
vsbattles.com

Boruto Rasengan Uzuhiko Implementation

Intro Recently, I made this accepted calc based upon the new information presented to us in the official Boruto WSJ website. This thread’s purpose is to discuss the validity of implementing this calc in scaling. If it’s deemed valid I will make an actual scaling thread afterwards to determine...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Shiraito983
hello can you share your thoughts here?
vsbattles.com

Villainess level 99 Tier CRT|possible Low 1-C upgrade

Intro This is Yumiella Dolkness Tier Upgrades Credits to this page for giving some information, actually I made mine too before but I'm too dense to notice it, same justification will be used here The Cosmology Note: I will not include the vague H 1-B right now so I hope I won't see it here...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Tanin_iver
Will you be able to provide some input in this thread? Also, can you ping the following staff members as well: DT, Ultima, Elizhaa, Executor_N0, Everything12, Planck69, Glassman as they are listed as knowledgeable on Tier 2 and 1 stuff.
Tengouk
View previous comments…
Nehz_XZX
Nehz_XZX
You could make a new thread and link the old one though you should preferably make your own additional points or explanations unless you can properly justify how the old one was left unfinished.
Nehz_XZX
Nehz_XZX
I would personally still wait a bit and maybe regularly bump the thread before doing anything else.
Tengouk
Tengouk
Appreciate it.
Tanin_iver
I see you have already worked on the Body Control page. It was something I was planning to tackle months ago and completely forgot. So thanks for handling it.
However, I have some minor nitpicks.
  • Can we use numbered list instead of bullet list for the types?
  • 'Advanced function control' looks wrong/weird. I think something like 'Control of advanced functions' looks better, imo.
  • You changed 'Control of the Body' to 'Control of anatomical features' but it seems like you have removed some of the description like "In addition, in some cases, it can be controlled even separated from the body parts, which gives ample opportunity for attack (or to recover from the destruction of the main body).". Now it seems to have complete overlap in terms of functionality to 'Advanced function control'
  • Also, I was thinking should we add a Note section where we recommend people to add a 'limited' prefix when the character doesn't display the full gamut of abilities expected of the type while only displaying some of the abilities and having some limitations for the body control type.
Crabwhale
Crabwhale
Old power pages are a shitshow, is my general response. If you want to fix 'em, be my guest. Just make it a CRT first.
Embers_of_Twilight
Sup bro
I had something to ask from ya.

About the wog on the silver sea's infinite layers size and the world's infinite size. It was a screenshot that is available at the cosmology of the blog, but the direct source link from where the author's comment was taken is not there. Do you, perhaps, have the source link of it ?
ByArrow
Hello! if you have time, can you please check this out?

vsbattles.com

Arrowverse CRT: Information Manipulation

The multiverse made of its own unique source code. Just as the human body is made up of DNA, so, too, is the multiverse made up of its own unique source code. By crack this code, Thawne was able to preserve his own knowledge and make it immune to changes in time and reality. And using this...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
ByArrow
Hello! if you have time, can you please check this out?

vsbattles.com

Arrowverse CRT: Information Manipulation

The multiverse made of its own unique source code. Just as the human body is made up of DNA, so, too, is the multiverse made up of its own unique source code. By crack this code, Thawne was able to preserve his own knowledge and make it immune to changes in time and reality. And using this...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Fixxed
Can you give some input here
vsbattles.com

Bigger infinity should be uncountable infinity

Yeah time to fixed this non sense. I still not know why the standard still keep this non sense, i think about this all days but still not get why this make sense So in previous thread , we already decided that being bigger than 2A in size can possibly have higher dimensional structure, as long...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
MrCricket8464
Could I get your input on this CRT?
vsbattles.com

Murder Drones Solver User(s) Upgrades

So two days ago, a friend introduced me to this calc, which has already been accepted. This should add High 4-C environmental destruction to Cyn's profile and possibly High 4-C environmental destruction to Uzi's profile due to her being able to use NULL, the same ability that allowed Cyn to...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
MrCricket8464
Could I get your input on this CRT?
vsbattles.com

Murder Drones Solver User(s) Upgrades

So two days ago, a friend introduced me to this calc, which has already been accepted. This should add High 4-C environmental destruction to Cyn's profile and possibly High 4-C environmental destruction to Uzi's profile due to her being able to use NULL, the same ability that allowed Cyn to...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
MrCricket8464
Hello, could I get your input on this CRT?
vsbattles.com

Murder Drones Solver User(s) Upgrades

So two days ago, a friend introduced me to this calc, which has already been accepted. This should add High 4-C environmental destruction to Cyn's profile and possibly High 4-C environmental destruction to Uzi's profile due to her being able to use NULL, the same ability that allowed Cyn to...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
DaReaperMan
vsbattles.fandom.com

Mournguls

Tier: At least High 8-C Name: Mourngul Origin: Warhammer Fantasy Gender: n/a Age: Unknown Classification: Aethyric Construct Powers and Abilities: Attack Potency: At least Large Building level (Mournguls are incredibly large and feared creatures across the Warhammer world, specifically in Troll...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

Would using one of these things at all be a fair match against first key Dio?
Chariot190
Chariot190
idk, dio kinda outdated, ive just been busy LS and just a few hax mainly all that he's missing that's relevant but still
but it's warhammer so gonna say nah
Fixxed
Can you give some input here
vsbattles.com

Bigger infinity should be uncountable infinity

Yeah time to fixed this non sense. I still not know why the standard still keep this non sense, i think about this all days but still not get why this make sense So in previous thread , we already decided that being bigger than 2A in size can possibly have higher dimensional structure, as long...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Tomfer
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Ionization is a weird method, looking back on it, I dunno if I'd still stand by those calcs. Still, I support the initiative, as I still very much adore XCOM. I seem to recall animations of soldiers dodging projectiles somewhat, although those animations of missed shots have always been very dodgy and odd. I can't think of anything in particular for LS off the top of my head, unfortunately.
Tomfer
Tomfer
I'm using your (old ass) suggestions as a base, hence why I'm still using ionization.

Speed-wise... Yeah, they don't really look like dodging and more of the opponent's fault for missing them, but still... I guess it can still be used? If nothing else comes. LS-wise, yeah, I guess I'll just put them as Athletic Humans since they're soldiers.

On another note, I've seen a very old CRT where you offered to put Sectoid's scaling as "possible" because Soldiers, while they can tank it, they do it barely. How about downscaling instead? It sounds more pausible since they can indeed tank it, it's not really open to possibilities.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Meh, I just can't personally remember what led to that conclusion- discussions that I don't think I have a presence in any more, I don't recall any lore that would have made that cool. They're still evaluated, but I think it would be better to just go with destruction/superheating, tbh.

That last point sounds fine to me. Six years of experience has changed how I view a lot of things, and our standards have also changed significantly since then.
DaReaperMan
I'm over my salt and am prepared to begin work on Hunter: the Parenting profiles

Now, are the feats present in the series itself good enough for proper ratings on most of the stats or do I need references from other WoD content in of itself?

Like, I know I'll need to pull from other content for Speed, I have no idea where Peak Human comes from for that, but are there any other stats I should be worrying about on that end?
HammerStrikes219
This is already calced, but I want your honest opinion on this feat as the recalc out it at Low 7C. We have a brief moment for the destruction in question and it seems to been fragmentation at least.

Edit: I forget I can clip on YouTube.

Here is a short clip of this scene

View previous comments…
HammerStrikes219
HammerStrikes219
To add a little more context to this, we see a spell launched at a side of a mountain and it technically did blow up a chunk of a mountain.
Chariot190
Chariot190
I can see that, just calc the destruction it caused?
HammerStrikes219
HammerStrikes219
Alright, I guess that is all I got there so yeah.
Back
Top