• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

I recently started working out; here is what I look like. Do you believe I have a chance in becoming the next David Laid.

1213477056663396353remix-1709402753534.png
Hello could you evaluate this CRT?
Hello, if you could, could you see this calculation? (I know the guy who made this calculation and it's for a verse that we both support)
MonkeyOfLife
MonkeyOfLife
Just use the movement/timeframe and compare it to how much she moved (by using body height or something)

You can either use the small bursts of movements or use a long distanced movement 🤔

Tho it mostly depends what scene you use and if you gonna use the whole scene or something in the scene 🐵 (she isn’t using a constant speed and has to accelerate and stuff)
If you don't mind, can you help here?
Not sure if you're one of the cgm's I'm not allowed to message, but, figured it wouldn't hurt to reach out. During our previous discussion you said this:
if a verse consistently has Supersonic calcs and then someone on the same level as these Supersonic characters suddenly has a Hypersonic+ calc, I’d likely consider the Hypersonic+ calc an outlier
I'd like to ask, would this be flawed? As it'd assume that the verses calculations are 100 percent correct and hold no flaws, I mean, there's a certain unpredictability about all feats/calcs right? Wouldn't it be better to scrap something like this and go only off of feats and or statements? Just wanted to confirm, to better my understanding of the power scaling on this site.

Also, putting the cork on a verses scaling without author statements or feats would be flawed right? If not is there any reason why? Just wondering, was researching a verse I previously visited and thought people might say the things above, so I wanted to get confirmation from you so my efforts wont be in vain.
CloverDragon03
CloverDragon03
I didn't even know you're not allowed to message certain CGMs tbh, but assuming I'm not one of them...

Statements are one thing, but for feats... I mean, we have to calculate them. If we're not doing that, we're just eyeballing it, which is even less reliable. That's not to say calcs are 100% flawless, but in a sea of unreliable methods, they're by far the most reliable means of gauging feats we have available to us.

As for the last part (the "putting the cork on a verse's scaling" part), I'm honestly not sure what you mean here. Could you elaborate further?
Vzearr
Vzearr
Like, not allowing a verse to scale higher then a certain tier because calculations are consistently in a tier/multiple tiers below it.

Would making/stating a downgrade on the basis of calcs for that verse being only consistent within a lower tier be allowed? (The outlier page is sort of vague).
CloverDragon03
CloverDragon03
Well like with a lot of things, it largely depends on the verse. It's really hard to come up with a sort of "one size fits all" rule on anything because there's pretty much always going to be exceptions, which is why we tend to prefer a case-by-case approach.

For instance, while you could potentially do this, there's also always the potential that the verse itself has good reasoning as to why a much higher tier of scaling is still valid (which would generally be something the supporters know).
Hey, hey, fanta here. Could you check out this minor ability-adding CRT that only affects two characters, if you have the time?

Can you give your opinions for this CRT? Its mainly a profile revamp and the verse supporters have already agreed that its correct
Can you give your opinions for this CRT? Its mainly a profile revamp and the verse supporters have already agreed that its correct
Can you give your opinions for this CRT? Its mainly a profile revamp and the verse supporters have already agreed that its correct
Hey, quick question if you don't mind. Based on the MGK thread, do you think there's ever a scenario where logic manipulation genuinely works better than law manipulation, or will it always just be diet law manipulation? Sorry if you're not the best person to ask lol
Sorry to bother you. If you have time, could you please evaluate this thread? Thank you in advance.
Sorry to bother you. If you have time, could you please evaluate this thread? Thank you in advance.
Could you please eveluate this crt.I reorganised.

TheRustyOne
TheRustyOne
I'm a calc group member, my vote is comparable to any normal member, meaning it's not needed.

I don't know this verse so I'm not okay with making any solid opinions on it.
Back
Top