• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts



Can you take a look at this issue?
Hi can you look at this pls



Can you take a look at this issue?
Hey Apex

Donkey Kong is 6-C now
Good evening, mind checking this intelligence rating?
Sorry to bother you, but if you have time, could you give section 5.1 of my blog a glance?
Hi. Saw you were interested in a possible Archie Comics General Discussion, soooo... here it is.

Hello friend, I wanted to ask something

Dino recently made a edit about a character which was Seven

Seven had a loss against Dazai due to the bomb which is far higher 8-7 tier

Dino removed that due to the recent CRT about Dazai which was the 2-A stuff which wasn't even the point on why he won against Seven

Should the win stay or should we take it out?
  • Like
Reactions: LuffyRuffy46307
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
If it significantly changes the chances, it should be talked about and may need redone. If it makes it impossible for one side to win, then it must be removed.
Hi can you look at this pls

Hi can you look at this pls ?

🙏

Because it seems that all the other staffs are either against or say that Geor's thread does not apply directly.
Btw Dereck, the thread already pass, we're just waiting for DT's draft for it.
Dereck03
Dereck03
anime-shiro.gif
Georredannea15
Georredannea15
Ahhh Dereck, we lost the match because you didn't wish us enough luck. It ended 2-1, the referee was bad!🤬
Dereck03
to explain, "antifeats" that are spoiler alert not rly antifeats and are just comedic moments if anything

Oh and by this logic sonic is tier 9 cause he cant escape jail and loses rings to meteor's :)11!11!!!
Your input will be appreciated


your input will be appreciated
Are you interested in join this matchup i made?

Hi, could you check my CRT please?
Hi, could you check my CRT please?
Has the God Of War Ragnarok discussion thread been deleted? I'm looking in the search bar and I can't find '-'
Planck69
Planck69
Everyone is having that problem.
LuffyRuffy46307
LuffyRuffy46307
It gave me a real scare here, I hope this gets fixed soon, the site is all weird even to type
Hello, I know you're busy with Jiraiya's profile right now, but I just came to tell you that I'm almost finished with Shino's profile that I started a while ago.

I would appreciate it if you could take a look and improve some things in it when you have time.

  • Like
Reactions: UchihaSlayer96
UchihaSlayer96
UchihaSlayer96
Yeah, of course.
I'll be done with Jiraiya in a few hours actually. After I'm done with him I'll look over Shino, and make improvements where necessary (I'll let you know first, of course)
sorry to bother you, but from this thread, i don't exactly know how to write the explanation for the blog, would you mind give me some ideas, references example, tbh, it is confusing, thank you very much, it is for DBH/XV anyway
  • Like
Reactions: Khanhba01
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
I'd include DT's quote
Depends on context, but possibly yes. Although that hinges on the word time travel.

Like, fundamentally you could say that you have one timeline that spans multiversal space. In the beginning, that space is empty. Then you rewrite the past so that 3 universes already existed in the space (which is the same as creating 3 timelines). So you rewrite the timeline of the multiversal space.
Then you do the same again to add 5 more.

Technically, you could say you only spawned several more multiverse spanning timelines. Like, now a empty multiverse spanning timeline, a multiverse spanning timeline with 3 universes and a multiverse spanning timeline with 8 universes exist. The total number of timelines is only 11.
If you are able to travel between multiverse spanning timelines, you would also be able to switch back from the multiverse spanning timeline with 8 universes to the one without any universes/timelines.

However, if you do that specifically via time travel, then that could be a good indicator that you are actually dealing with an additional time dimension. Because that indicates that the progression of the creation of timelines is done within a (presumably continuous) flow of time and that time wouldn't be that of the regular past where those universes always existed.
And the the FAQ page

Q: How do temporal dimensions impact on tiering?​

A: The relationship between the spatial dimensions of a universe and the additional temporal dimension(s) may be visualized as something akin to the frames of a movie placed side-by-side. Basically, the time-like direction may be thought of as a line comprised of uncountably infinite points, each of which is a static "snapshot" of the whole universe at any given moment, with the set of all such events comprising the totality of spacetime.

This structure can then be generalized to any number of dimensions, which is why destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather than 3-A or High 3-A). For example, a higher spacetime continuum with two temporal dimensions (instead of just one) comprises a higher temporal axis that spans regular temporal dimensions that the entirety of 4-dimensional spacetimes, or equivalents to it are serviced by (This is similar to how the time dimension in a 4-dimensional spacetime continuum spans uncountably infinite 3-dimensional snapshots of the universe), qualifying it for Low 1-C. Unless fiction shows otherwise, a different multiversal temporal dimension spanning universes that themselves have their own time dimensions as well (not the same multiversal time dimension that services many Universes and is shared by them), or even a single universe with two active temporal dimensions, qualifies. The same applies to three or more temporal dimensions.
Then since you know the verse better than I do, just give the following justifications:
  • The timelines are separate from one another. In other words its not a branching timeline but a bunch of separate timelines
  • When time travelling you make your own specific timeline rather than branching out a previous timeline
  • Showcase that if one timeline is erased another timeline is unaffected
Then with the above say "Since Dragon Ball fulfills the above standards, each overarching timeline should be considered to have a different temporal dimension. Which would fit the criteria for a Low 1-C Hyper Timeline" or something like that.
Appear in the general DB discussion.

Since you seem to be the main supporter of DBH/Xenoverse/Fusions etc.

Since this affects this too.
If you don't mind, can you help here?
I made this to see which characters scale to the feat you have accepted, Can you give it a look when you have time please?

Hi Qawsedf, you've been actively involved in this thread.

A different thread has now been opened for Ben10 and one of its foundations is still the same, 5-D space beyond.

But there weren't enough votes, so I'm going to ask you to open this up again , because Space Beyond's downgrade from 5-D will also affect the new upgrade thread
Back
Top