• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

I'm not going to say that every criticism of me that you have is flawed KT, because it'd be pretty stupid of me to try and pretend I'm perfect but while you're entitled to your perspective of me I just want you to know that I don't think you're entirely fair in every comment you made.

For example, regarding your Blackbeard thread where you accused me of "utilize your staff privileges to just open and close a thread when you feel like it", I didn't close your thread; I asked you if you had any objections to the thread being closed and you accepted it. If you had told me "I don't want the thread closed because I have more arguments to give" or something along those lines then that would have been fine. You extended the same courtesy to me, more or less, in the Dressrosa thread when you said "I'll wait till he wakes up and replies before I think to do so", instead of just closing the thread outright as somebody else seemed to suggest.

You can have a negative opinion of me but I don't think you can accuse me of abusing my staff privileges when one of your examples is me asking if you wanted a thread to be closed and letting you make the decision.

I don't intend to start an argument with you about this either, I just couldn't respond in the thread so I needed to leave this here in good faith and that's all I have to say.
Hello friend, Can i have your input in this thread i made?

Hello can you evaluate this thread?
hello, can you please check and evaluate this calc if possible? the LS sections only (KE was accepted but LS needs more input), thanks in advance
Hey lonkitt, can you check out this thread?
Hey Clover, do you know how to go about calculating speed from someone creating a vortex by running in a circle?
Any thought?

Any thought?

Verse: Magical Girl Raising Project
Characters/Images: Cranberry, Magical Daisy, Pechka, Marika Fukuroi
Description: Standard Render, without the dates. For Cranberry, please include all the vines. For Magical Daisy, please include the magic ball at her fingers.
Location Delivery: My wall
Status: Pending

I would like to ask if its possible for you to give your input about this matter.

I would like to ask if its possible for you to give your input about this matter.
Hi Lephyr I think for a discussion to be accepted in VSBW 2 admins have to accept that crt.

Along with you, our admin named Elizhaa also accepted it (and many people participated in this discussion and approved it).

I wonder if it was accepted? I don't want to tire Antvasima, so I have to ask you.

I know this is random, but I noticed a small error regarding your calculation here.

For the radius of the explosion, you divided the width of the screen. However, the explosion reached the PoV from where it originated. To get an accurate radius of the explosion, you'd have to angsize the distance the explosion is from the screen. Fortunately most of the values you already have. So I took the liberty of doing the math here to see what you think. Px scaling is here.

5493.889•1083/[1103•2•tan(70deg/2)] = 3851.91m radius

3851.91^3*((27136*1.37895+8649)^(1/2)/13568-93/13568)^2 = 4593184.695 Tons | 4.593 Megatons

Not a huge difference obviously. Though it does increase the result a few times.
LaserPrecision
LaserPrecision
I also noticed that the size of the cave is px-scaled incorrectly. Think they mixed up the numbers.

MHABE.png


5493.889•1083/[1013•2•tan(70deg/2)] = 4194.13m radius

4194.13^3*((27136*1.37895+8649)^(1/2)/13568-93/13568)^2 = 5929405.85728 Tons | 5.93 Megatons
TheRustyOne
TheRustyOne
Px scaling is usually preferred over angular size, which considered to be less reliable.

The explosion does spread out off screen no matter which way you measure. I don't believe using px scaling is wrong in this case.

Also, why are you using the explosion for the angular size and not the cave? The px size of the explosion is 1920 and not 1013, making your results much lower.

5493.889•1080/[1920•2•tan(70deg/2)] = 2206.71186 m

However, I didn't realize I put down 1103 instead of 1013. That is a mistake and I thank you for informing me of it.
LaserPrecision
LaserPrecision
I get that, but ang sizing measures a completely different axis. The width of the screen is the X-axis, and the camera is the Z-axis. There's a less visible X-axis than there is a Y-axis.

I used the cave because the explosion started there and propagated towards the screen.

Either way, glad I could help in some way.
Hello Elizhaa, would you be able to take a look at this?

Are you going to make a blog or something explaining all the cosmic tier Mario feats that have been rejected?
Armorchompy
Armorchompy
The feats weren't really formally rejected, just proven as outliers. I had half a thought of making a thread where I tried to get most of the cosmic feats officially rejected, but... i dunno, there was a good amount of toxicity in the downgrade thread, i don't really wanna go for round 2 immediately.
Hypertornado099
Hypertornado099
I mean things like the Black Jewel feat, not the feats we just accept as outliers
Could you take a look at this please

Could you provide some evaluation to this
Can you help out with this thread? I want to create a new verse but need some important things clarified
Can you help me with this thread. I want to create a new verse but I need some things clarified first.
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
I can't give permanent participation approval rules wise:
  • Only staff members with evaluation rights can authorize regular members to participate in Staff Discussion threads. Thread Moderators are able to grant permission for a single post at a time, whereas administrators can give permission for up to three. Bureaucrats are the only staff members that are allowed to give indefinite posting rights for a particular staff thread. If a staff member with evaluation rights determines that a regular member has misused their granted privileges, these can be removed.
But if you want to make (up to) three comments go ahead I guess.
Hey Qaws, can i have your opinion on it?
Back
Top