-
TheUnshakableOne Firestorm808 TheUnshakableOne wrote on Firestorm808's profile.
I saw your chart, and something i personally believe is important since the OP is using a coment from Ultima that mentions it.
perhaps a separate chart for when "Size of Universe in comparsion to said space beyond 2-A" comes into play
For example, The CCCC-Dimension trivializes all universes as galaxies and nebulas or even stars, and said "Space" is only stated to be "Infinitely greater" (and/or not stated to be) than the infinite/finte number of Galaxies/star/nebulas that are actually universes.
This is just my personal opinion, i can elaborate more on it if youd like me too.
i mention this because of Ultimas comment is being used in the OP
perhaps a separate chart for when "Size of Universe in comparsion to said space beyond 2-A" comes into play
For example, The CCCC-Dimension trivializes all universes as galaxies and nebulas or even stars, and said "Space" is only stated to be "Infinitely greater" (and/or not stated to be) than the infinite/finte number of Galaxies/star/nebulas that are actually universes.
This is just my personal opinion, i can elaborate more on it if youd like me too.
i mention this because of Ultimas comment is being used in the OP
Anyway, this particularly bothersome thing left aside: I'll say I'm neutral with regards to whether or not "the space beyond" is Low 1-C. As I've expressed to some of the thread's participants off-site, I think this largely depends on whether we consider inherently finite visual representations (In this case, a universe being mistaken for a star when seen from the space beyond it) to mean anything when it comes to infinitely large objects and spaces. Although I will say that being finitely, or more generally, countably, larger than a 2-A space is not a thing, no, unless the verse makes clear that such a thing is possible, in which case we're obviously forced to roll with it. As a default, though, we don't do that.