Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I never voted for Ichika??????Votes:
IChicka: 17 (Arnoldstone, chosen, Popted2, CIC_SHARK, Epsilon_R, Nierre, Taun, Kazuma, edutyn, 45saef, superstar, dareaper, lordgin, Lynieryz, ziller, Epic, ssgengar)
Tatsumaki: 5 (Kachon, DD, Commander, That_moron, Random)
You can already get your L bro, there is no changing it.Can someone do an actual recount of the votes, just to make sure people who voted for tatsumaki weren’t counted as voting for ichika
???
“3 upscales” means nothing without the specifications of it.It’s worth noting that Ichika also scales like 3 upscales above her value.
this is the 2nd time in a row he’s put a tatsumaki voter on ichika’s side???
he didn't vote he just said he's leaning towards tatsumaki which by the way you put that he voted for ichika.
Flawed logic.Let's wait and see if Tatsumaki tries to use internal organ attacks on Saitama.
The only situation in which we've seen her go for Dura negation was in a very specific situation (targeting a capsule to help her sister) and while it is plausible She could use it against other opponents, we don't have definitive proof yet that it's in character (her only fights have been against fodder where it wasn't necessary or Psykorochi who had a shield preventing her from doing so and additionally it wasn't necessary anyways since she got ap stomped).
To be fair, swimming is a skill that’s learned, not necessarily something an untrained person can do. However, if someone who can swim is fighting someone who is allergic to water, then they would know to jump in the water, even if they’ve never shown that they know how to fight a person with water allergies before.Tatsumaki couldn't swim because she hasn't shown she could swim. This is literally the rule on shit like that.
When did Tats use dura neg in combat?In this case tatsumaki knows how to dura neg, and would do it if she’s fighting someone allergic to dura neg.
I am in a hostage situationWhen did Tats use dura neg in combat?
liked that you wrote my nick correctly, i acknowledge youBtw Gin VS Coomandar will be better to follow than Ichika VS Mob
she doenst need to use in combat to proof thar she can use it in combatWhen did Tats use dura neg in combat?
And for those who voted Ichika FRA, I would appreciate a check-in to see if you have anything to add regarding new counterarguments made since your votesI am in a hostage situation
Jim has a loaded gun in his hands
I find out that Jimmy has never killed somebody before
It must be out of character for him to kill me
I should walk up to him and try to punch him, there is clearly no way he’d shoot me, it’s out of character
Tatsumaki used to have regen/dura negation for that but it was taken off after a CRT Gin made to take it off so I don't think you can use that as an argument.Also psykorochi was technically dura negated since she was crushed on a cellular level along with all of her roots
Could you list down the new counterargumentsAnd for those who voted Ichika FRA, I would appreciate a check-in to see if you have anything to add regarding new counterarguments made since your votes
Tatsumaki wasn’t fighting to kill when fighting saitama, so anything related to that is an invalid point for what she would do in a battle to the death like this one.Tatsumaki used to have regen/dura negation for that but it was taken off after a CRT Gin made to take it off so I don't think you can use that as an argument.
For the in character stuff, I'm just being consistent with the assumptions everyone else uses for other characters, Tatsumaki has shown that she can manipulate air and we've seen her level of accuracy with her TK from the pill feat she had however no one would argue that she could manipulate the air inside your lungs and pull them out to suffocate you because she's never shown she would do something like that, even if it should be plausible due to her intelligence level.
The hostage example you gave also is somewhat flawed as it is a person holding a gun to your face which would naturally obviously suggest they may be trying to kill you even if they haven't done so before.
In Tatsumaki's case she has several options beyond using pure Ap, such as trying to twist or tear her a part, trying to pierce her with sharp rock spears, trying to crush her within rocks, trying to do that weird muscle thing she did to Saitama etc
These are all things she has done before that we've watched her do before ever resorting to Dura negation. I'd be open to the idea that she might use it once all options are exhausted but I disagree with assuming it will be her go to right after Ap doesn't work because we can't confirm it.
Actually the play there would just be to pull out their lungs, which tatsumaki would be smart enough to do if raw power couldn’t win and she was willing to kill. Relatively simple there.For the in character stuff, I'm just being consistent with the assumptions everyone else uses for other characters, Tatsumaki has shown that she can manipulate air and we've seen her level of accuracy with her TK from the pill feat she had however no one would argue that she could manipulate the air inside your lungs and pull them out to suffocate you because she's never shown she would do something like that, even if it should be plausible due to her intelligence level.
It’s the fact that tatsumaki also has a figurative gun in this situation in the form of her durability negation. The only reason she’s never used it is because her enemies have all been ants that she can just stomp on with her AP, and because she’s presumably not willing to kill against saitama.The hostage example you gave also is somewhat flawed as it is a person holding a gun to your face which would naturally obviously suggest they may be trying to kill you even if they haven't done so before.
Personally I agree with her having an AP advantage and I'd vote for her if it wasn't for site rules preventing her from upscaling above the AP gap.Tatsumaki wasn’t fighting to kill when fighting saitama, so anything related to that is an invalid point for what she would do in a battle to the death like this one.
For the record, Tatsumaki’s AP alone shitstomps her just with the massive upscale on top of massive upscale that should allow her to one shot anyways. But if for some reason her full AP didn’t work, then she’d just immediately go for something fatal with durability negation
Pulling out someone's lungs seems more difficult then simply pulling away the air inside someones lungs as you have to still have to rely on raw power to do so.Actually the play there would just be to pull out their lungs, which tatsumaki would be smart enough to do if raw power couldn’t win and she was willing to kill. Relatively simple there.
Despite having genius intelligence in regards to his combat, we never argue Goku would overcome an AP gap by using instant transmission to charge a kamehameha or spirit bomb for one hour and then coming back to launch it in the opponents face.It’s the fact that tatsumaki also has a figurative gun in this situation in the form of her durability negation. The only reason she’s never used it is because her enemies have all been ants that she can just stomp on with her AP, and because she’s presumably not willing to kill against saitama.
It isn't allowed, because while you can definitely make note of her scaling chain, you can never really concretely tell how strong this makes her. It's just unquantifiably much higher. Dismiss it all you want, that's just how it is.Also can I just add that a lot of the votes are based on the blatant misinformation that Tatsumaki’s scaling chain isn’t allowed to consider her as having the AP advantage in this match, which is concerning to say the least since that contradicts literally every other vs match’s common practice and literally has no wiki standard to back it up
Personally I agree with her having an AP advantage and I'd vote for her if it wasn't for site rules preventing her from upscaling above the AP gap.
Was it always like that or did it get changed recently? I remember participating in quite a few matches were the one-shot scaling chain thing lead to one-shotting characters in a match. Same with the undamaged by X tons thing.
Still, this is probably for the best since it makes matches with shounen characters with massive scaling chains much easier.
I have one of the girthiest scaling chains for RotMGI think it was always like this. Infact the only time I know of that the scaling chain was used as a match decided was when both parties were comparable in AP.Although someone brought up the rule out of spite when I made a bigger scaling chain than him :/
It’s not directly quantifiable, but we are completely allowed to estimate the range of AP that a character should be superior to, hence us using common sense to say that tatsumaki is most likely far over 2 times stronger than a character who can get blown into pieces by a character who tatsumaki was able to then into blood paste.It isn't allowed, because while you can definitely make note of her scaling chain, you can never really concretely tell how strong this makes her. It's just unquantifiably much higher. Dismiss it all you want, that's just how it is.
liked that you wrote my nick correctly, i acknowledge you
Are any of these upscales even remotely comparable to the amount of upscaling tatsumaki gets from instantly grinding psykos into meat paste? I’m going to take a wild guess and say no, but you can elaborate if you want.Ichika also has 3 upscale chain of her own which makes Tatsumaki’s two one shot less meaningful.
This is just wrong. Because obviously any estimates made will contain some bias in them, like assuming the upscale is enough to surpass Ichika because you want Tatsumaki to win, or me assuming it's not enough because I want Ichika to win.It’s not directly quantifiable, but we are completely allowed to estimate the range of AP that a character should be superior to, hence us using common sense to say that tatsumaki is most likely far over 2 times stronger than a character who can get blown into pieces by a character who tatsumaki was able to then into blood paste.
I can guarantee that not a single person here actually buys that tatsumaki isn’t over twice as strong as orochi. The only thing stopping people from saying otherwise is a wiki rule that….doesn’t even exist in the first place?
See again, Jotaro Kujo not being upgraded to 8-B because everyone decided that his high 8-C upscaling chain would make him able to hurt character above baseline 8-B, meaning 8-B would be a downgrade from at least high 8-C likely far higher/even higher
It’s a common practice that happens constantly in vs threads. Hell, even in an Orochi vs Boros match, Gaia Cannon and Collapsing Star Roaring Cannon were virtually the exact same in AP since Gaia cannon upscales from about half the AP of CSRC
TL;DR: source?
Bro, what I'm trying to tell you is that if Tats doesn't start immediately with dura neg (which I'm sure was removed in a Gin CRT), Tats is just going to be stomped into oblivion. And Tats has never started with tough neg, not even against blatantly dangerous Dragon-level opponents.she doenst need to use in combat to proof thar she can use it in combat
And what does this information change here?telekinesis is also a hability that IGNORES durability depending on how skilled your are.