- 32,835
- 38,108
Would you be kind enough to source this? The energy requirement to jumpstart a Sun's core I mean.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The Marvels [Spoilers] Upgrade
- Thread starter Iamunanimousinthat
- Start date
- Status
- 3,418
- 1,258
It's the energy produced by the sun in a second many websites have it some are more specific but it's arpund the same value
- 9,886
- 12,893
You're phrasing this question really weirdly, idk how to respond admittedly
- 3,493
- 1,360
- Thread starter
- #84
That comment is from a different calc.
- 3,493
- 1,360
- Thread starter
- #86
Yes. It was approved in the comment section of the blog.
- 3,418
- 1,258
The calc being correct or not does not affect those arguments you mentioned on the other comment, im assuming that either way you are going to disagree.
- 9,886
- 12,893
It absolutely does affect it. If a calc isn’t approved or or incorrect, it’s invalid. Ergo, can’t be used
That being said, I do think this is a huge outlier in terms of scaling to guys like Thor and Thanos
- 3,418
- 1,258
This doesnt change regardless of the calc being correct or not, considering that at least 2 members agreed the math is probably right.
I also think this shouldnt scale to previous movies, even if she was this powerful the whole time there is no proof that she used this level of energy before even more if we consider the sheer size of her aura, this feat alone is bigger than even what the celestial did destroying a planet with the power stone and yet we are basically assuming Thanos without using the stones is stronger than that.
- 9,886
- 12,893
This feat scaling to a new key for Carol makes much more sense IMO
- 3,418
- 1,258
Dont think a new key is necessary, just put a "up to 4-C" just because she is that strong doesnt mean anyone would scale to it
- 6,590
- 3,423
I was going to post here about this, glad I'm not alone
Yeah, when the upgrades were added I was a bit confused on why it was scaling to so many people, then I realized Danvers had no new key and she should, although there is one thing that could give some characters a bit of consistency with that level of power, that being Gungnir, Loki used it against Thor right ? And that thing is High 6-A, so why not scale ?
Yeah, when the upgrades were added I was a bit confused on why it was scaling to so many people, then I realized Danvers had no new key and she should, although there is one thing that could give some characters a bit of consistency with that level of power, that being Gungnir, Loki used it against Thor right ? And that thing is High 6-A, so why not scale ?
- 3,493
- 1,360
- Thread starter
- #93
I'll make a sandbox Captain Marvel with a new key.
- 17,276
- 27,078
I think yall are missing something important... the calc thats in the OP is the new calc that was fixed up by revan the old calc that all that discussion was about doesn't exist as part of this crt anymore so it should just be this new one that me and DMUA accepted
- 17,276
- 27,078
Anything prior to this doesn't matter. This is the calc yall should be looking at but ig OP never actually said anything about the new calc being made from the discussion here soo... i can see how that was confusingNew blog
The Marvels: Captain Marvel reignites Hala's Sun
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 3,493
- 1,360
- Thread starter
- #96
Captain Marvel Post The Marvels Profile
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 17,276
- 27,078
Why is it a new key... the high 6-A part of this feat it'd just be replacing thag rating the scaling chain already existCaptain Marvel Post The Marvels Profile
- 3,493
- 1,360
- Thread starter
- #98
It's an option, mods, are arguing it for it to be new key, I can make a blog where it just replaces the current one as well
- 17,276
- 27,078
Then more MCU guys should be pinged here who can discuss all of that because rn it doesn't have all the attention it needs to make that call with just like 1 or 2 people, especially since is a calc centered CRT to begin with
- 3,493
- 1,360
- Thread starter
- #100
Okay. Allow me to make the other blog first before we ping more people.
- 3,418
- 1,258
As far as I know those 2 calcs are for different things the 6-A one that Captain Marvel is scaling and scales to a lot of others is flying through hala's sun this one is for reigniting the sun.
The Marvels: Captain Marvel flies through Hala's Sun
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 17,276
- 27,078
The old OP calc was nothing to do with the displacement one it was completely different something im not even talking about in that first reply so idek why you're saying that, the second reply is literally just me questioning why has a new key because the high 6-A key would just be low 4-C due to how we currently scale the characters..As far as I know those 2 calcs are for different things the 6-A one that Captain Marvel is scaling and scales to a lot of others is flying through hala's sun this one is for reigniting the sun.
The Marvels: Captain Marvel flies through Hala's Sun
Pls read...
- 3,418
- 1,258
Because we were talking about the previous calc that was already accepted and is 6-A, the one that everyone scales to is that accepted calc the previous 6-A for reigniting the sun was never put on any profile
- 17,276
- 27,078
Brah are you just not reading at all like you cannot be this dense actually...
This is the old calc in question they are literally talking about it until we get the calc that's now in the OP from the last page
This is the old one bro
Captain Marvel Re-igniting Hala's star
vsbattles.fandom.com
Like please stop wasting time
- 3,418
- 1,258
Brah are you just not reading at all like you cannot be this dense actually...
This is the old calc in question they are literally talking about it until we get the calc that's now in the OP from the last page
This is the old one bro
Captain Marvel Re-igniting Hala's star
Like please stop wasting time
We were never talking about that calc, the new key was discussing (including a staff member) that none should scale to this movie feats not specifically talking about any of the calcs
The previous reigniting the sun calc was never added to any profile.
This is refering to Thor's scaling instead of scaling to a feat of Captain MArvel that happened after Endgame
I have no ideia where you took the ideia that the previous 6-A calc that was changed was even mentioned here
- 17,276
- 27,078
Brother yall all replied to the Qawsedf post earlier in the CRT that were about the calc I literally just linked.. you cannot be serious rn
Idek why you're linkling the lightning quotes because I never remotely commented on that bit so its just yap
- 3,418
- 1,258
You know that her 6-A calc that is currently used to scale her to 6-A is from the marvelsCaptain Marvel Post The Marvels Profile
I explained why that value come up and it has nothing to do with the previous calc anyways,
The value that Qawsedf was talking about that i replied was the value of what the sun produces per second its a fact it has nothing to do with the previous 6-A calc
- 17,276
- 27,078
No shit sherlock...
Brother Qaw was talking about that in the context of the calc I literally just linked, that's what the entire one and a half first pages were about, that's the old calc that needed to be fixed i'm talking about the one that's replaced in the second page and now the OP.. I'd appreciate it you genuinely actually read anything instead of skimming...
- 3,418
- 1,258
Qawsedf is saying that we shouldn't use any of the calcs and stick with the 6-A that is the energy that the sun produces per second which is where this comes from
- 17,276
- 27,078
Brother I already know what Qaw is talking about he's saying that in the context of the calc im literally talking about , there's a lot more discussion after that that led to the current calc in the OP which is a fix to all the issues of the "last one" that the first 2 pages spent discussing
Like you're trying to explain shit but because you haven't read it all at all and are just so focused on yapping you're missing basic simple things that you're reading on the screen
I'm very well aware of what Qaw is saying I already knew said information, what you're doing is mistaking that with what the current calc in the OP and even then like I said there was more discussion after which to even get this calc you should really read more
- 3,418
- 1,258
I need to stop explaining because this is filling with no content, none of this is talking about the previous calc. The reason Qawsedf was mentioned was by
To find the source for a NOT A CALC, and none of this page is even arguing about the previous calc, you were the one mentioning the previous calc that is not being talked about for quite a while. The second page is all about the new calc.
- 17,276
- 27,078
Brother Qaw made the statement in regards to the previous calc which KLOL is asking for a source for and questioning when he should be looking at the new calc and disregarding that statement hence my saying this
Somehow your equating that to whatever this is below ...something I never asked
Like you're genuinely just not reading
- 17,276
- 27,078
Like you're not understanding these 2 concerns are brought up upon looking at the first page and most of the last which was about the old calc and he asked for a source for something we already moved past and lonkitt made that comment about that calc which had already been replaced which you're somehow not understanding isn't relevant to the new calc in the OP hence me saying what I said
- 3,493
- 1,360
- Thread starter
- #114
I will put a note in the OP saying that the messages in the thread up to a certain point are about a previous calc.
- 6,590
- 3,423
Only the one when she going through that Star, I know, but it was done by Post Endgame Cpt Marvel, if we make a new tier for her, some characters would lose their High 6-A rating.
Yeah, if we stop scaling Post Endgame Cpt Marvel to the rest of the cast, they lose their High 6-A and I proposed something different to take its place, it also covers consistency issues
And I have no idea what 6-A calc ur talking about
- 17,276
- 27,078
It was pretty self explanatory that it was replaced imo if ya just read those first 2 pages but yeah I'd say just do it for convenience because the memo was not gotten
Is there any reason for this tho aside from just a higher tier, like is she stated to be stronger or amped at all because she does it pretty casually no?
Like these things have to be in order first or else it'd just be for the full power key
Last edited:
- 3,418
- 1,258
I was trying to explain why no one was talking about the previous calc that was in the OP, because during this thread it was decided the first calc was not good so a new one was made in which the new one is 4-C and the older one was lower. Anyways it was not refering to you and Dalesean027 didnt understand anyways
- 17,276
- 27,078
Brother no one asked why the previous calc wasn't being talked about are you this dense
- 6,590
- 3,423
Ah, sorry I meant a new key for her, one for the new movie
All feats from her from this movie would stop scaling if that was the case, my first reaction when I saw the current profiles (With characters like Thor and Thanos scaling to Danvers' High 6-A feat of going through a Star) was to question myself why her new feats aren't for a new, separated key, sometimes I believe to be more accurate to do
- 3,418
- 1,258
AS I said earlier im not gonna argue anymore
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
