There's a difference between qualitative superiority and just superiority.
Also, this is accounting that the dream is infinite and not each dream is infinite.
That's true
I agree we should chill but this VeryGoofyToddler person is a previously inactive account that randomly barged into this thread without permission. He should be removed from it like all the others who didn’t ask for permission to participate in these threads. Not removing him would be unfair.
This is literally a Twitter statement from a YouTuber.
Is this the supposed guideline that you assume should be the rule of thumb? Having been previously inactive to relating threads and barging in without permission aren't a correlation as to why I should not participate in an open community assessment of what we should do with a revision of the project. If it were such a problem then the staff would have done so a long time ago as I have provided some viewpoint and assessment to this thread.
Is this just a personal vendetta? I disagree with your view as most people here did as well as the best you've come up with is removing me for apparent “unfairness.”
There's plenty of in comic evidence for the same thing
Then that's what should be use.
I mean Scott was explaining what he wrote. Which was supported by the comics.
Morrison makes it very clear that it is literally every conceptual dichotomy and opposition. Literally any dual conceptual system.
That's literally NLF.Morrison makes it very clear that it is literally every conceptual dichotomy and opposition. Literally any dual conceptual system.
Explain
Even if something is "meant" by the author/writer/whatever, dosen't mean we should threat it that way. There are other verses who mention "beyond all conception" or "beyond all concepts" or whatever, but we still threat those as concepts mentioned specifically in the verse.
What?
Is your point that because Morrison didn't mention every conceptual dichotomy the Monitor isn't transdual? That he must in order for the Monitor to be non-dual / transdual?
You can't know if he also meant the concept of dimensions to be included lol.
Why would that include the concept of dimensionality? But either way, being beyond or above spatial dimensions isn't 1-A anymore unless there is a proof those dimensions are superior to each other.
I take it that's already been proven for DC? I mean it looking at the blog, it should be obvious that there's the regular multiverse then there's the sphere of gods which is considered a higher dimension, then there's the monitor's sphere considered a higher dimension to Limbo. All of which are superior to each other.
Those are planes of reality not spatial dimensions.I take it that's already been proven for DC? I mean it looking at the blog, it should be obvious that there's the regular multiverse then there's the sphere of gods which is considered a higher dimension, then there's the monitor's sphere considered a higher dimension to Limbo. All of which are superior to each other.
Limbo is also shown on the Multiverse Map to transcend the sphere of gods, so there's that.
Dimensionality is a sub-concept used to describe a space. The concept of dimensionality in the current context can't exist without the concept of space. Dimensional Manipulation is just a subset of Spatial Manipulation.
Of planes of reality not spatial dimensions.
To clarify, are you saying a qualitatively superior realm of reality is not qualitatively superior in spatial dimensions?
Yes.
Do we have a current profile example or a staff discussion for this claim?
I mean... how can spatial dimension = another realm completely unrelated to spatial dimensionality?
vsbattles.fandom.com
We are using 4-D or 5-D and so on shit for verses that don't even mention spatial dimensions or even work on this theory.For the record, even our Reality-Fiction Standards support using dimensions with their qualitative superiority.
Reality-Fiction Transcendence
It is not uncommon in fiction for characters to view lesser realities as if they were fiction, in much the same way as a real world human would view fiction. Frequently that comes in the form of almighty author characters which can freely rewrite those lesser realities. The other way around...
"Viewing [a 10-Dimensional High 1-C structure] as fiction [would be the equivalent of an 11-D High 1-C.]"
"Speaking in simple terms, a "dimension" can be considered an axis of movement and measurement, through which beings and objects can displace themselves throughout a given physical system."
"Can" dosen't mean it's 100% at the time.
If a realm has one more axis of movement than another, is the former realm not higher dimensional?
Did we? Can i see the scans?
I don't see what point you're trying to make with a panel from 1982.
Just thought it was interesting
Alright, so we have reached some point of agreement.
