- 4,479
- 2,353
- Thread starter
- #681
At best it is a supporting feat yea
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe this could be a supporting feat?
How much does it take to destroy Tanks again though? Another thing though is that their Tanks do look an ordeal different from ours and possibly a bit more advanced; Given even in the 1930's (Not just counting future Australians), the TFC inventory alone is visibly more out there for its age so maybe they have stronk tanks as our current ones or more so idk.At best it is a supporting feat yea
I mean we have that Rocket and shotgun built, under certain dedication he's actually surprisingly creative in some IQ.He also thought that all of them were on the moon, and that a man asking for directions was a Nazi. Though he has been known to tell the truth, like when he infiltrated a Robot meeting.
Considering the feat is kinda vague i think it would just be the durability of the tanks which varies between 9-B to 9-AHow much does it take to destroy Tanks again though? Another thing though is that their Tanks do look an ordeal different from ours and possibly a bit more advanced; Given even in the 1930's (Not just counting future Australians), the TFC inventory alone is visibly more out there for its age so maybe they have stronk tanks as our current ones or more so idk.
Yeah I thought so, but the armor of one is 9-A; I mean its not a far off possibility to consider advancements going this far already.Considering the feat is kinda vague i think it would just be the durability of the tanks which varies between 9-B to 9-A
I'm sorry but I think it was said Tank frag could not scale to anyone but maybe only their weaponry?... Unless we see Solider Rocket Jump with said Tank Buster, but given the conundrums of philosophy here it might not go too as it is.Can someone for the love of god calc the fragmenation of the tank please
The feat is completely unusable, for reasons we have already said. (It being Game Mechanics, and a major outlier since the Mercs take literally no damage from something that is by far stronger than any feat they have preformed, the Mercs not even being the ones to fragment the tank, etc). So it's completely irrelevant to this thread.Can someone for the love of god calc the fragmenation of the tank please
Yes. But just in case I get the context of "Tank Buster" Is literally a weapon that, well, busts certain Tanks? Considering Solider consistently rocket jumping with SOME of these weapons then yeah at the very least it might indeed be a supporting 9-A as most 'Tank Busting' theoretically would reach these levels.The feat is completely unusable, for reasons we have already said. (It being Game Mechanics, and a major outlier since the Mercs take literally no damage from something that is by far stronger than any feat they have preformed, the Mercs not even being the ones to fragment the tank, etc). So it's completely irrelevant to this thread.
And like I said, I do not want this discussed further.
But if you just want it calced, just go to the Calculations Request Thread.
According to it's name, yes it apparently can "bust tanks". And keep in mind that these tanks are different from the MvM tanks.Yes. But just in case I get the context of "Tank Buster" Is literally a weapon that, well, busts certain Tanks? Considering Solider consistently rocket jumping with SOME of these weapons then yeah at the very least it might indeed be a supporting 9-A as most 'Tank Busting' theoretically would reach these levels.
Busting tanks is 9-A by default or high 8-C considering than TF2 technology is laughable superior that our current technologyAccording to it's name, yes it apparently can "bust tanks". And keep in mind that these tanks are different from the MvM tanks.
I guess but we wait for abstraction to respondso do we have enough to upgrade them to 9-A?
Not necessarily, only Australia's technology is superior due to their Australium supply. Saxton Hale provides the mercs with pretty crappy weapons all things considered.Busting tanks is 9-A by default or high 8-C considering than TF2 technology is laughable superior that our current technology
Yes I thought so.Tanks are often destroyed by 9-B to 9-A weapons, the "High 8-C" stuff is just due to the engine's combustion via chain reaction often times.
Still the technology of TF2 should be superior considering that healing to the point of reviving and teleportion is a normal thingNot necessarily, only Australia's technology is superior due to their Australium supply. Saxton Hale provides the mercs with pretty crappy weapons all things considered.
Only some parts, not all. Engineer and Medic are the exception since neither of their main weapons/inventions were provided by Saxton Hale.Still the technology of TF2 should be superior considering that healing to the point of reviving and teleportion is a normal thing
Yeah but the tanks comes from man coOnly some parts, not all. Engineer and Medic are the exception since neither of their main weapons/inventions were provided by Saxton Hale.
Maybe. Though there will often be a catch so I wouldn't give my hopes up.so do we have enough to upgrade them to 9-A?
There are to many 9-A feats and not much anti feats so...Maybe. Though there will often be a catch so I wouldn't give my hopes up.
I know, but you know.There are to many 9-A feats and not much anti feats so...
We don't know anything about the tanks, all we know is that Soldier supposedly busted them.Yeah but the tanks comes from man co
Well clearly there was a histories worth of people in more over the top situations (Humans Rocket Jumping two stories for example) And yes there were a WWll Solider lived through so its not to say there weren't Tanks even without MVM. xDWe don't know anything about the tanks, all we know is that Soldier supposedly busted them.
7-C Saxton Hale scaling to the Yeti scaling to theLittle Boy
Well yeah that's kind of what I meant. It held an explosion that destroyed large portions of wall.Lifting Strength can be translated into AP with Potential Energy, right?
Potential Energy only applies when an object is liftedLifting Strength can be translated into AP with Potential Energy, right?
I'm not in the mood for a gloat like that, trust me we did try waiting extensively one time and not much too that it just happens eventually.Wow, this thread has gone nowhere, even the 10 page MK CRT has more significant progress than this thread. Do you guys mind if I make a separate CRT about their powers and abilities sometime? Because I feel like bringing it up here is just going to clog it even further.
Nice!I think that the feats mentioned in the OP + the questionable "tank busting" feat by Soldier should be more than enough for TF2 to at bare minimum, be "likely/possibly" 9-A, but whatever.
I also brought this up earlier, but I don't think anyone noticed. Ms Pauling was able to strike with comparable force to one of Saxton Hale's casual punches, albeit with a battering ram. Some weapons like the Grenade Launcher and Rocket Launcher should upscale for obvious reasons.
Also, I should mention that all the feats mentioned were all preformed by crappy weapons that Saxton Hale made, which is made evident by the fact that Saxton himself says that Ms Pauling never gets the good weapons. However, they also have access to premium mercenary weapons made by Mann Co since Ms Pauling stole these top weapons from Mann Co. So these premium weapons should be stronger than the weapons that preformed the 9-A feats.
Yeah... Been a while... Maybe a just as huge post regarding a 'debunk' of the verse is processed one of these days even though in my heart I knew they are eventually 9-A at peak.
Can we just do it please.