- 842
- 511
It is? The "only denial of end is" " refers to Tao infinity being ineffable because taoists think infinity is only infinity if ineffable you know" " refers to something ineffable right.You’re upgrading it off something not substantiated by the verse (the absolute infinity stuff). Therefore, it’s a stretch. Nobody’s saying there aren’t Taoist references in the Nasuverse, but upgrading a verse off something never stated in it is absurd to me. It really is
How exactly is it absurd when it's the reference is there?