- 4,523
- 2,242
I think he’s saying they have 3D perceptible flesh and blood. That’s weird. Tho they’d still be higher d baseline iircyou can be higher dimensional and not a conceptual being
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think he’s saying they have 3D perceptible flesh and blood. That’s weird. Tho they’d still be higher d baseline iircyou can be higher dimensional and not a conceptual being
"Enfleshed Gods" > Divine SpiritsI think he’s saying they have 3D perceptible flesh and blood. That’s weird. Tho they’d still be higher d baseline iirc
If it has a less solid basis, then using it as an analogy to some thing with a more solid basis is practically useless.which in layman's terms means using the real-life book/source in comparison to what was presented in the verse, what would it even bring to the conversation?
Sure do thatI could show something extremely similar to the description of the Root inside a cultivation novel
I just explained like I did beforehand in the thread as well.The main contention I have is, what would it even serve for?
This is just time wasting, there's no probability or any system of probability established for you to verify that. I can be from the west and still have more knowledge about eastern philosophy Than western philosophy.Realistically there is way more probability of cultivation novels replicating almost 1/1 their source material that originates from their country than something outside of China
May is another useless term to use in thread, I quite frankly couldn't care about that.The point is, my example would only be a drop of water in an ocean of untranslated or obscure novels that may go to the same extent or even further.
.About that.
Adding 3D to a source that doesn't mention 3D has to be some sort of reality warping power againI think he’s saying they have 3D perceptible flesh and blood
OH Ye I forgot about that, true"Enfleshed Gods" > Divine Spirits
Having a body/flesh has never necessarily been a limitation in Nasuverse.
I don't know how to answer to not clog the thread with a gigantic message, so I'll try to answer within a "spoiler" tag. I hope it will work since I'm not quite used to how to do it efficiently. I apologize in advance if anything is weirdly formulated. Do tell me if I need to change something!If it has a less solid basis, then using it as an analogy to some thing with a more solid basis is practically useless.
Sure do that
I mean sure, I never implied that someone outside of China/Eastern territory couldn't comprehend their philosophy better than the Western one, probably that it exists too. I'm not basing myself on pure speculation either, you just have to go check websites like Qidian to realize the number of Xianxia stuff is WAY higher than anything currently present on the Western side. It's just simple maths really. Again, outsiders can write stuff regarding Taoism too and it already exists (on Webnovel or Royalroad for example) but people living in the land where Taoism originated and writing about the Xianxia genre on a daily basis seem more inclined to deal with that kind of stuff and replicating their original source.This is just time wasting, there's no probability or any system of probability established for you to verify that. I can be from the west and still have more knowledge about eastern philosophy Than western philosophy.
There's no realistically there's way more probability, that's just arbitrary.
No. Its useless here. I'm not about to debate something that obviously would derail the ongoing thread.There's actually a staff thread that never got resolved regarding the Root's tier because it was locked pending the completion of the Low 1-A standards staff thread, which is barely progressing because Ultima and DT are busy revising Marvel Comics. Should we do something with that here?
I mean, we can lock it or something.Should we do something with that here?
I think this thread can wait till the negative theology post on the Staff discussion thread ends. It's not like I'm rushing for it to get accepted immediately.I mean, we can lock it or something.
But for the thread itself @Tdjwo please contact other stuff. Currently this isn't going anywhere.