-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
STRONGEST One-Punch Man Discussion Thread!
- Thread starter Phoenks
- Start date
- 194
- 15
As with opm (almost all manga), doesn't it almost always show a weaker portrayal than the previous one, unless it's a new tech feat? i.e. although they shouldn't expand on each other unless they're scenes showing equally new powers as we know. But this is same case. Base Boros destroyed two pillars to emphasize his power, but mb Boros changed the battlefield itself.
- 26,437
- 30,770
How is the feat even ambiguous? The ship survive the Saitama landing with minor damage, which is 6-A. It's not shown that the power core was damaged. And Boros was the guy that was destroying sections of his own ship. It's that simple
Also the Saitama landing nd the moon jump are 2 seperate feats.
Saitama landing on the ship was 6-A
Saitama jumping from the moon was High 6-A
- 22,476
- 18,726
I don't get that first part, but I don't really have the effort to continue this conversation either.
- 194
- 15
If so, the Boros should be high 6-A. It's done thousands of times more damage. The reason I said it shouldn't scale is because all of Boros' attacks didn't do much damage to the power core.
- 26,437
- 30,770
No? The ship is barely above baseline 6-A. Meaning Boros can't upscale to High 6-A. I don't see how the power core is related to anything
- 194
- 15
what? i don't understand If the moon landing only caused minor damage just few meter, the ship's full body should be high 6-A.
- 26,437
- 30,770
Why? That's not how it works, it tanked a 6-A force with little damage. That's it
- 16,286
- 17,801
No, it shouldn’t. The impact has been calced, and it’s 6-A. It can’t be higher unless said impact is recalced to be higher.
- 194
- 15
It's thousands of times bigger, so it takes thousands of times more energy to destroy it. In any case, I still don't agree with scale it to the moon impact.
- 26,437
- 30,770
That's not even stated anywhere. We can't just assume multipliers like that.
Taht and the calc already takes nite of the ship's size and the dispersal of energy
- 194
- 15
If you scale with moon impact, this is not calc staking. They are all made of the same metal in the official setting. That is, the author intended.
It is only natural that a person who destroys several meters of land is ten times weaker than a person who destroys several tens of meters of land.
- 26,437
- 30,770
I never mentioned calc stacking?
This conversation is getting pointless and going in circles.
If you have a problem with 6-A, then go and look at the calc and say why it's wrong. The ship should not scale to Tatsumaki or the moon jump as it has no proof it scales to the peak of the former or the latter feat at all.
- 16,286
- 17,801
This, this, so much this.
6-A is not going anywhere unless the impact is recalced.
- 1,013
- 430
Just wait till AG for Boros to be high 6-A. I'm sure AG will scale above Tats and Boros scales to him based off two separate statements one of which is very detailed. That or re-calc the moon jump.
- 194
- 15
Because I thought you were referring to calc staking because I know multipliers only have to do with statements. I've already gone to far on the Tatsumaki topic. I should have told you beforehand. It's honestly vague, because it doesn't live up to the wiki standards.
and There is no problem with the calculation, the tilt of the gravity core means that it was stronger than the holding force of the spaceship. Although Boros' explosion had an omnidirectional effect (ie it also delivered damage vertically), it was weaker than the fly power of the core. because of.
- 194
- 15
However, the moon impact still didn't do as impressive a damage as a full blown so it can still scale, but at least it doesn't upscale
- 194
- 15
I'm curious. the strength of the power core actually made the spaceship not move even with Boros' explosive attack. Without taking this into account, can't we simply calculate the energy that moves the spaceship. isn't it?
- 1,313
- 863
Understandable, have a nice day
- 194
- 15
I calculated Saitama's moon jump (not moon impact), but I'm not sure if that's correct. This is my first calculation
vsbattles.fandom.com
saitama's serious jump
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 26,437
- 30,770
Yeah, that seems extremely inflated and likely wrong.I calculated Saitama's moon jump (not moon impact), but I'm not sure if that's correct. This is my first calculation
saitama's serious jump
- 194
- 15
I'd appreciate it if you could let me know which part is wrong.
Saitama's serious punch is lower than this value, but it is the result of wind pressure anyway, and the high end of Boros' csrc was 13 exaton, wasn't it?
- 26,437
- 30,770
I'm not a calc expert, but there is no way that destroy only a part of the moon is moon level.
The chosen end for the CSRC was 1.3 exatons.
Also there's barely any wind on the moon afaik.
- 194
- 15
What does earthquake have to do with wind? And it's not at the moon level, it's multi continent level.
- 26,437
- 30,770
Huh, must've misread it then. But something about does seem kinda off. This would also only scale to Saitama.
- 2,500
- 1,248
I really don't see why using Tatsumaki's performance on the ship should be the reason Boros scales from her, all the high 6-A feats in the series required attacks that could do massive damage to the Earth:
CSRC - surface wiper
Serious Punch - >>>>>> surface wiper
Psykorochi's beam - shaved off a chunk of the Earth
Imo I'd say Tatsumaki didn't do her best because if she did she would do massive AoE and there were still other heroes in the battlefield
This guy kinda feels like a reverse Atomic Sekiro lol
CSRC - surface wiper
Serious Punch - >>>>>> surface wiper
Psykorochi's beam - shaved off a chunk of the Earth
Imo I'd say Tatsumaki didn't do her best because if she did she would do massive AoE and there were still other heroes in the battlefield
This guy kinda feels like a reverse Atomic Sekiro lol
- 4,387
- 3,338
Wait, does that mean Atomic Sekiro hasn't been around since Tatsumaki got weakened? That would make sense...
- 16,286
- 17,801
He’s active in the MHA discussion thread.
- 4,387
- 3,338
Right, I'm saying he migrated away when Tatsumaki stopped being High 6-A
- 4,387
- 3,338
Almost certainly
- 4,406
- 1,334
Murata said he was running a little behind so likely Monday.
- 4,387
- 3,338
He did? A recent tweet?
- 26,437
- 30,770
Tats never got downgraded tho, only upgraded
- 4,406
- 1,334
- 194
- 15
yes just big storms and city twists affecting the earth lol
- 2,500
- 1,248
are they High 6-A????
- 194
- 15
what? Can't get the point? You are arguing that a high 6-A large effort attack power should always be a calculate high 6-A feat.
Similar threads
