- 24,976
- 26,824
Why is it even an ultimate attack? It's not even stated to be a special attack move of any sorts.
And I'm talking about scaling. Boros should not be stronger than his own trump card.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
STRONGEST One-Punch Man Discussion Thread!
- Thread starter Phoenks
- Start date
And I'm talking about scaling. Boros should not be stronger than his own trump card.
- 194
- 15
CSRC is calculated entirely as an assumption and the limit is not clear i.e. you can simply increase csrc power in this case
I mean meteoric burst. Sorry for the confuse.
- 24,976
- 26,824
Still tho. Throwing calculations away for a second. The CSRC > Meteoric Burst Boros as the CSRC is his greatest trump card.
@ ByAsura Maybe we should just switch back to the standard 183 petaton calc?
- 194
- 15
Of course, that won't happen, since casual punches can't create wind pressure like serious punches, even if the wind pressure and power are the same. Isn't the comparison here not punch and punch, but wind pressure and punch?
- 194
- 15
I mean, we have no idea at what way CSRC destroy surface exactly. That means there is no bounds set, and in this case, isn't it enough to simply assume CSRC destroy surface with more destructive way?
- 194
- 15
He obviously put more effort into MB Boros than his usual casual punch, so we don't know how strong that punch is.
- 2,549
- 1,444
They can, not at planetary scale, but they can do it (unless it doesn't appear in Manga, which Idk)
- 194
- 15
yes i know But in this case I'm talking because the two feats overlap, and there's no reason to ignore one feat as a simple assumption.
- 194
- 15
Right, I forgot about that.
- 24,976
- 26,824
Also ByAsura, did you say something about the moon jump being sus? What was the problem with it?
- 22,343
- 18,529
It's kind of inconsistent and weird. Also, it doesn't seem like an author would think tilting a city-sized space ship is Multi-Continent level. At the very least, though, Boros' attacks far surpass the firepower outputted by his own ship, his subordinates and armoured form, Garou's non monster forms, Orochi, etc.
- 194
- 15
I am not making circular reasoning.
For example, "because the CSRC is strong, Boros can withstand the wind pressure of the serious punch, so csrc is strong." i don't do that
And what about assume? He actually withstood the attack.
I'm not make claims CSRC is strong in the first. csrc is strong, only that it is strong by feat.
And if a feat and an assumption collide, of course, isn't it correct to choose the assumption that corresponds to the feat?
- 24,976
- 26,824
Why Orochi and his ship tho?
At the very least tho if we wanna lowball, Boros should be High 7-A to 6-C.
- 22,343
- 18,529
He wasn't obliterated by the attack, so you're assuming he's Multi-Continent level. There's the assumption. He could just as easily be 6-A.
As for the circular reasoning, never mind on that part. I misinterpreted your statement about the CSRC. Also, I guess my statement that he can't withstand normal punches was founded on an assumption.
As for the circular reasoning, never mind on that part. I misinterpreted your statement about the CSRC. Also, I guess my statement that he can't withstand normal punches was founded on an assumption.
I meant his First Form, but that's kind of irrelevant given scaling.
- 24,976
- 26,824
Ok, but I don't see how Orochi or his ship is relevant to any of Boros' scaling
- 194
- 15
Um, is that an assumption? If character can withstand an attack, isn't it right to scale into that attack?
Maybe it has something to do with the hit area? Because wind pressure and 6-A are 500 times different If that is wiki standard, I apologize.
- 22,343
- 18,529
The assumption is that Boros scales enough to be High 6-A. He didn't withstand it, he barely survived, and that was only because he's an alien. I don't see why he wouldn't be Continent level.
Surface area is a factor, but I do think the blow on Boros wouldn't fall far behind High 6-A.
Surface area is a factor, but I do think the blow on Boros wouldn't fall far behind High 6-A.
- 360
- 239
Can we upgrade Flashy flash to SOL?
- 194
- 15
Oh, I understand. Durability isn't just about surviving an attack, it's a criterion for being able to fight and perform normal activities after being hit by that attack.
That's what you're trying to say. I think the topic of the conversation was diffrnece each other.
But I thinks he can still get higher values by scaling from just a few hundred teratons. IIRC In the case of a one-shot attack, isn't it 7.5 times the target's durability?
- 24,976
- 26,824
For the last time, we are not using the databook
- 24,976
- 26,824
That's only for vs match ups, it doesn't apply for scaling
- 194
- 15
oh I forgot it. thank you
do know when to use the hit area and when not to use it? Wasn't the Phoenix Man rated 6-C before he was nerf?
- 24,976
- 26,824
He was High 7-A before, but he got needed due to the redraws removing his feat.
- 24,976
- 26,824
- 3,996
- 2,789
Vaporization would probably be more likely than melting when it comes to actually destroying the crust with "scorching", but since the crust is being destroyed via a heat based method (you can't actually scorch stone in the literal sense of the word, let alone destroy it in such a manner), I think melting's a good lowball.
Last edited:
- 443
- 444
I think it´s because Orochi scales above Geryuganshoop who is also possibly relativistic and we don´t scale people to Saitama´s power since casual Saitama´s power is inconsistent.
- 435
- 266
He specifically says that he won't hold back so he should be using atleast the level of effort he used against boros if not more given that he might have held back against him narratively also how is his power inconsistent
Last edited:
- 194
- 15
Moreover, it is very strange that the csrc is only 183 petatons. The csrc is actually not completely lost even with the original power(not wind pressure) of the serious punch. But I'm not going to argue that this increases the power of csrc though for now.
Last edited:
- 3,996
- 2,789
CSRC is 1586 petatons.
If some of CSRC's energy survived the Serious Punch, that was because Saitama A) underestimated how much energy he needed to cancel CSRC by a little or B) said energy was outside the Serious Punch's area of effect. Since Saitama is normally pretty good at proportioning the power of his punches for his enemies, I think it's B), that also makes sense the way the serious punch and CSRC were fanning out from their respective origin points
- 1,013
- 428
So about the whole BOS Genos Mountain feat the current calc assumes standard mountain height and Violent Frag. I found some older calcs that assumed melting and they got low 7-B and vap just makes it 7-B. With that I think there're two ways to update the calc: 1. Update the height of the mountain 2. Use a different method for calcing the destruction. For the height you could try scaling it based of this or this. I also saw a calc were someone assumed the mountains were based off of real ones in the Saitama prefecture since the whole OPM continent is based off of that. For the method of destruction this gives a good shot of how the building and mountain was destroyed prior to this shot. That or just reference Genos' other feats for what values to use.
- 4,381
- 1,314
The current height is extremely lowballed.
Even if it were doubled it would still be a lowball.
Even if it were doubled it would still be a lowball.
- 4,381
- 1,314
I'm currently of the opinion we should use the second scan but in both of these the mountains are consistently close to the clouds.
