- 15,416
- 15,769
Didn’t the issue with scaling the ship to the moon jump have something to do with surface area, and not visuals?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, there are things that Mr bambu and ugarik brought up aboveDidn’t the issue with scaling the ship to the moon jump have something to do with surface area, and not visuals?
Didn't think he'd surpass Saitama so fastMy god, Genos Small 5-B hahhahah
shitWait, I used the wrong volume. I need to use the upper half of the cap, nor the lower
The CSRC is 6.24 to 52.21 times more powerful than the proposed new calc.What's the current calc for Boros CSRC
Current CSRC calc is 1 (low end) to 13 (high end) exatonsWhat's the current calc for Boros CSRC ?
I remember Standard Surface Destruction was 183 Petatons which means...Tatsumaki can overpower it aswell with Serious Series: Serious TK
What he's referring to is recoil. As in the energy Saitama imparts on an object is imparted on him. Landing on the ship under this principle would be the same energy generated from moon jump, as Boros' aura was still on Saitama when he landed. Meaning he was ignoring friction while reentering the atmosphere.
You can actually argue that the energy from the impact with the ship in much greater than the energy that created the cratoler on the Moon. But this reasoning feels very speculative since we don't see any shockwave on the Earth
Based of what they said it would scale its just that they feel the visuals are a bit iffy, but I don't see a problem with it.Recoil wise it would scale, it's just iffy visually due to lack of large scale impact effects outside of tilting the ship. Which is what Ugarik is talking about.