- 167,400
- 75,924
Okay. I think that you seem to make better sense here, but I am not the best person to ask.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Spaces in Times Dragon Ball revision
- Thread starter Omegabronic
- Start date
- Status
- 2,654
- 3,422
Thank you for your inputOkay. I think that you seem to make better sense here, but I am not the best person to ask.
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #283
.......he never said this, at all, in any capacity, he clarified as such and somehow you know what he meant better than himself?
The areas between the parts of the macrocosm are equally part of the macrocosm, if you are saying that its the in between part than you are saying that it is part of the macrocosm, but as defined, it is straightfowardly said that it isn't
Difference being, the Subspace would be inside the bubble of reality of the universe, in your allegory the Universes would be the realms, Neutral Space would be Subspace and the timeline would be the macrocosm, either way, the Neutral Space is part of the timeline as the Subspace would be under your allegory, so again, you are saying that it is part of the macrocosm, trying to say you aren't saying that is not gonna workFor example, we have the neutral space which exists between the Universes, but it’s stated to exist in a different space from the 12 Universes because even though it exists between them it doesn’t exist in them.
Translation here:
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #284
Yeah, yet that other scan in my summary says otherwise, that it isn't part of the living world
- 53
- 74
And that is relevant, why? Your summary is because you are the OP of the thread, and they are the opposition so, they are well within their rights to argue against in the face of your proposed arguments, it makes no sense to point this out. This is the only comment I will make, sorry for the interruption.
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #286
Yeah they are........but to argue against it you also need to adress it.......the scan i pointed Ice did not
- 3,473
- 5,122
My dude, read what Executor said he said that it doesn’t belong to the macrocosm but exists between the dimensions of the macrocosm. I want you to take a look at what he said again instead of just talking to talk. Nobody is saying it exists in the macrocosm, only that it exists between the dimensions of the macrocosm like Executor literally clarified in your second scan.
Also, the Subspace would not have to be within the macrocosm to be the thing that displaces them. The same way the neutral space isn’t apart of the macrocosms, but it’s the thing that between them. You’re literally once again misrepresenting my argument by saying I claimed it’s within the macrocosm, when I’ve clarified multiple times that I’m not claiming it is.
Uh, the scan in your 1.4 summary literally says that the universe and demon realm are dimensions within the living world which are like 2 sides of a coin. What the hell? Which scan says that the demon realm isn’t apart of the living world?
Icl, I’m prolly gonna stop responding atp
Edit: Referring to this scan, Executor mentions how he said it’s between the dimensions of the macrocosm, but not in the macrocosm, so he doesn’t know how people got the conclusion that it was in the macrocosm.
Last edited:
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #289
is this a vote?Okay. I think that you seem to make better sense here, but I am not the best person to ask.
- 9,869
- 11,134
I have removed the comments about the vote stuff, besides the initial one and Omega asking for clarification. Don't spam the thread with that again. Thank you.
As for Nierre specifically: Omega is adding all staff votes indiscriminately. There's nothing wrong with that.
As for Nierre specifically: Omega is adding all staff votes indiscriminately. There's nothing wrong with that.
- 3,684
- 2,208
Lephyr there is a problem when the basis of Flashlights vote is not valid as its just plain incorrect. Goku did not move from Otherworld to the Living via the Nimbus Cloud. For that reason the vote should not be counted.
- 9,869
- 11,134
They still agreed with the thread overall.
- 3,473
- 5,122
What about Qaw and Ant they made their positions clear? Their votes should be counted.
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #294
read you what he said:
"Me: How did you reach the conclusion that the Dimensions spoken in this scan are the other realms of the macrocosm
Him: I didn't"
do you see the problem? besides, IF IT IS BETWEEN THE PARTS OF THE MACROCOSM, THEN IT IS PART OF SAID MACROCOSM, which he said as such he never said it was part of, so again, if you have a problem, just ask him yourself, you can't know what a person meant more than the said person themselves
in my second scan he clarified that the text clarifies how it doesn't exist in the World/Macrocosm at all, aka.......he says that it isn't inside the macrocosm between the individual parts of it, he even clarifies that he said that in reference to a phrase that again, doesn't talk about the realms
i can't believe that man is saying one thing, yet you are saying he said the opposite of what he said
..........you do understand that for this allegory, the Neutral space would be inside the timeline to be what separates the individual parts of said timeline, which makes the Subspace equally part of the Macrocosm as the things that separates the individual parts of said Macrocosm, right?
you are saying that it isn't.....using an allegory that points at it being, you can see the confusion, can't you?
this one
"a world that is neither the afterlife nor the living world"
fair enough
- 3,684
- 2,208
if thats the case then my final request is that this should also be counted. not sure how flashlight was counted and this isn't
- 9,869
- 11,134
Last comment I will respond in regards to this to make it as clear as possible: There votes can be counted, yet there's no obligation to add it to the OP. I am keeping track of them all regardless. Plus, again, absolutely nothing wrong for asking for further clarification, specially when Ant adds the fact he's not the best at evaluating things. This is a topic that gets repeated every few months because of bs like this where votes aren't clear enough. I'd also prefer if they were more clear with their respective stances.
Now please, stop the votes bs, jesus christ.
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #297
i also somehow forget Clover, thank you for reminding me
- 3,684
- 2,208
No worries man all I care about is fairness, not accusing you of not being fair but we gotta keep consistency so people don't go for your throat. no hard feelings sorry if it came off agro
- 20,411
- 17,281
Not really.
- 1,699
- 1,339
i think @Qawsedf234's name can now be added in the disagree section. he clearly doesn't agree with the new summary either.
- 2,654
- 3,422
like lephyr said votes are being counted, lets not clutter the thread
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #302
He said he is leaning towards disagreement, not that he disagrees outright
- 9,869
- 11,134
He has explicitly stated he agrees with Tilted.
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #304
He said "I'm leaning towards Tilted's position", meaning that-
.......well, ok then
- 20,411
- 17,281
I thought I was clear, but if I wasn't then I disagree with your position.
- 11,379
- 10,612
Fair enough. I thought he was trying to counting staff votes that actually do matter. Wasn't implying there was anything wrong doing so specifically.
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #308
Yeah, 2 v 4, this has been rejected now, will make the re calculation of the BoG speed feat and make it a calc thread later, thank you all who helped in these series of threads. Will edit the verse page soon
Hellformer
He/Him- 1,376
- 1,114
This would downgrade the current BOG calc right?
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #310
Yeah it will
- 3,170
- 2,847
After the time-skipping fiasco, I'm beginning to think you're a ********* (wait, that's censored?) for wanting to touch that topic. Infinite universe db is a hotbed.
Last edited:
Deleted member 40688
Guest
*********?
- 3,170
- 2,847
Someone who enjoys pain.
- 3,684
- 2,208
Btw you can still focus on the latter part of the revision, removing the bubble depiction. The only thing that was rejected was the removal of them being space times.
- 1,699
- 1,339
He should be able to have the bubble depiction removed in a separate thread. in fact they probably should've been done separately to begin with
- 11,514
- 4,151
- Thread starter
- #316
really now? ok then, i will let this ongoing still then to get opinions on the latter part then, thank you for telling me
- 1,699
- 1,339
I don't think that's a good idea tbh. I think most staff are kinda sick of this thread
They're two very different things anyway
Last edited:
- 9,869
- 11,134
Isn't this being tackled on another thread by @LuffyRuffy46307 ?
- Status
Similar threads
