- 167,699
- 76,293
Okay. I think that you seem to make better sense here, but I am not the best person to ask.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay. I think that you seem to make better sense here, but I am not the best person to ask.
Thank you for your inputOkay. I think that you seem to make better sense here, but I am not the best person to ask.
.......he never said this, at all, in any capacity, he clarified as such and somehow you know what he meant better than himself?Nobody’s arguing the Subspace is apart of the macrocosm, but that it exists between them. Executor literally just said in that scan how it exists between the dimensions in figure 1 (aka the macrocosm). So it’s funny to say Executor isn’t saying that when he literally says that at the end.
Difference being, the Subspace would be inside the bubble of reality of the universe, in your allegory the Universes would be the realms, Neutral Space would be Subspace and the timeline would be the macrocosm, either way, the Neutral Space is part of the timeline as the Subspace would be under your allegory, so again, you are saying that it is part of the macrocosm, trying to say you aren't saying that is not gonna workFor example, we have the neutral space which exists between the Universes, but it’s stated to exist in a different space from the 12 Universes because even though it exists between them it doesn’t exist in them.
Translation here:
Also while we are at the point of demon realm not being part of the macrocosm how this scans prove s that the demon realm is the part of the living universe and mentions under it
The term used here is この世
Which means this world or living universe
Not to mention in this scan we can clearly see them mentioning demon relam as part of the macrocosm
And that is relevant, why? Your summary is because you are the OP of the thread, and they are the opposition so, they are well within their rights to argue against in the face of your proposed arguments, it makes no sense to point this out. This is the only comment I will make, sorry for the interruption.Yeah, yet that other scan in my summary says otherwise, that it isn't part of the living world
Yeah they are........but to argue against it you also need to adress it.......the scan i pointed Ice did notAnd that is relevant, why? Your summary is because you are the OP of the thread, and they are the opposition so, they are well within their rights to argue against in the face of your proposed arguments, it makes no sense to point this out. This is the only comment I will make, sorry for the interruption.
My dude, read what Executor said he said that it doesn’t belong to the macrocosm but exists between the dimensions of the macrocosm. I want you to take a look at what he said again instead of just talking to talk. Nobody is saying it exists in the macrocosm, only that it exists between the dimensions of the macrocosm like Executor literally clarified in your second scan........he never said this, at all, in any capacity, he clarified as such and somehow you know what he meant better than himself?
The areas between the parts of the macrocosm are equally part of the macrocosm, if you are saying that its the in between part than you are saying that it is part of the macrocosm, but as defined, it is straightfowardly said that it isn't
Difference being, the Subspace would be inside the bubble of reality of the universe, in your allegory the Universes would be the realms, Neutral Space would be Subspace and the timeline would be the macrocosm, either way, the Neutral Space is part of the timeline as the Subspace would be under your allegory, so again, you are saying that it is part of the macrocosm, trying to say you aren't saying that is not gonna work
Uh, the scan in your 1.4 summary literally says that the universe and demon realm are dimensions within the living world which are like 2 sides of a coin. What the hell? Which scan says that the demon realm isn’t apart of the living world?Yeah, yet that other scan in my summary says otherwise, that it isn't part of the living world
1.4 Demon Realm
Edit: This one is...........the thing that can change the dimensional aspect for the realms, see the Demon Realm is still called as treated as a realm, same terminology, same treatement as the others, yet it is blatantly said to be in another dimension, thus "realms" being used to describe "dimensions" is
is this a vote?Okay. I think that you seem to make better sense here, but I am not the best person to ask.
Lephyr there is a problem when the basis of Flashlights vote is not valid as its just plain incorrect. Goku did not move from Otherworld to the Living via the Nimbus Cloud. For that reason the vote should not be counted.I have removed the comments about the vote stuff, besides the initial one and Omega asking for clarification. Don't spam the thread with that again. Thank you.
As for Nierre specifically: Omega is adding all staff votes indiscriminately. There's nothing wrong with that.
Lephyr there is a problem when the basis of Flashlights vote is not valid as its just plain incorrect. Goku did not move from Otherworld to the Living via the Nimbus Cloud. For that reason the vote should not be counted.
They still agreed with the thread overall.Gonna have to agree with the thread.
What about Qaw and Ant they made their positions clear? Their votes should be counted.I have removed the comments about the vote stuff, besides the initial one and Omega asking for clarification. Don't spam the thread with that again. Thank you.
As for Nierre specifically: Omega is adding all staff votes indiscriminately. There's nothing wrong with that.
read you what he said:My dude, read what Executor said he said that it doesn’t belong to the macrocosm but exists between the dimensions of the macrocosm.
in my second scan he clarified that the text clarifies how it doesn't exist in the World/Macrocosm at all, aka.......he says that it isn't inside the macrocosm between the individual parts of it, he even clarifies that he said that in reference to a phrase that again, doesn't talk about the realmsI want you to take a look at what he said again instead of just talking to talk. Nobody is saying it exists in the macrocosm, only that it exists between the dimensions of the macrocosm like Executor literally clarified in your second scan.
..........you do understand that for this allegory, the Neutral space would be inside the timeline to be what separates the individual parts of said timeline, which makes the Subspace equally part of the Macrocosm as the things that separates the individual parts of said Macrocosm, right?Also, the Subspace would not have to be within the macrocosm to be the thing that displaces them. The same way the neutral space isn’t apart of the macrocosms, but it’s the thing that between them.
you are saying that it isn't.....using an allegory that points at it being, you can see the confusion, can't you?You’re literally once again misrepresenting my argument by saying I claimed it’s within the macrocosm, when I’ve clarified multiple times that I’m not claiming it is.
this oneUh, the scan in your 1.4 summary literally says that the universe and demon realm are dimensions within the living world which are like 2 sides of a coin. What the hell? Which scan says that the demon realm isn’t apart of the living world?
fair enoughIcl, I’m prolly gonna stop responding atp(unless I need to)I think the staff got enough info. But I just wanted to address those points.
if thats the case then my final request is that this should also be counted. not sure how flashlight was counted and this isn'tYeah I really don't agree with Omega on that point at least
Last comment I will respond in regards to this to make it as clear as possible: There votes can be counted, yet there's no obligation to add it to the OP. I am keeping track of them all regardless. Plus, again, absolutely nothing wrong for asking for further clarification, specially when Ant adds the fact he's not the best at evaluating things. This is a topic that gets repeated every few months because of bs like this where votes aren't clear enough. I'd also prefer if they were more clear with their respective stances.What about Qaw and Ant they made their positions clear? Their votes should be counted.
i also somehow forget Clover, thank you for reminding meif thats the case then my final request is that this should also be counted. not sure how flashlight was counted and this isn't
No worries man all I care about is fairness, not accusing you of not being fair but we gotta keep consistency so people don't go for your throat. no hard feelings sorry if it came off agroi also somehow forget Clover, thank you for reminding me
Not really.does my updated Summary does anything for your opinion?
like lephyr said votes are being counted, lets not clutter the threadi think @Qawsedf234's name can now be added in the disagree section. he clearly doesn't agree with the new summary either.
He said he is leaning towards disagreement, not that he disagrees outrighti think @Qawsedf234's name can now be added in the disagree section. he clearly doesn't agree with the new summary either.
He has explicitly stated he agrees with Tilted.He said he is leaning towards disagreement, not that he disagrees outright
He said "I'm leaning towards Tilted's position", meaning that-He has explicitly stated he agrees with Tilted.
.......well, ok thenI also took the liberty of asking in discord
I thought I was clear, but if I wasn't then I disagree with your position........well, ok thenhe could have said himaelf here in the thread, but what can one do
Fair enough. I thought he was trying to counting staff votes that actually do matter. Wasn't implying there was anything wrong doing so specifically.As for Nierre specifically: Omega is adding all staff votes indiscriminately. There's nothing wrong with that.
This would downgrade the current BOG calc right?Yeah, 2 v 4, this has been rejected now, will make the re calculation of the BoG speed feat and make it a calc thread later, thank you all who helped in these series of threads. Will edit the verse page soon
Yeah it willThis would downgrade the current BOG calc right?
After the time-skipping fiasco, I'm beginning to think you're a ********* (wait, that's censored?) for wanting to touch that topic. Infinite universe db is a hotbed.Yeah it willif the latter part of the OP had been accepted i would have tried to go for Infinite size once more, but oh well
*********?After the time-skipping fiasco, I'm beginning to think you're a ********* (wait, that's censored?) for wanting to touch that topic.
Someone who enjoys pain.*********?
Btw you can still focus on the latter part of the revision, removing the bubble depiction. The only thing that was rejected was the removal of them being space times.Yeah it willif the latter part of the OP had been accepted i would have tried to go for Infinite size once more, but oh well
He should be able to have the bubble depiction removed in a separate thread. in fact they probably should've been done separately to begin withBtw you can still focus on the latter part of the revision, removing the bubble depiction. The only thing that was rejected was the removal of them being space times.
really now? ok then, i will let this ongoing still then to get opinions on the latter part then, thank you for telling meBtw you can still focus on the latter part of the revision, removing the bubble depiction. The only thing that was rejected was the removal of them being space times.
I don't think that's a good idea tbh. I think most staff are kinda sick of this threadreally now? ok then, i will let this ongoing still then to get opinions on the latter part then, thank you for telling me
Isn't this being tackled on another thread by @LuffyRuffy46307 ?Btw you can still focus on the latter part of the revision, removing the bubble depiction. The only thing that was rejected was the removal of them being space times.