- 6,029
- 3,528
does everyone agree to this?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
『INFINITE UNIVERSE IN DRAGON BALL SUPER』
- Thread starter LuffyRuffy46307
- Start date
- Status
- 1,967
- 1,664
he doesnt have to prove anything, spaces bigger than infinity but not being uncountably infinite exist, you're bringing up a non-argument again and again that even most of the opposition isn't bothering to touch because its nonsensical
- 6,029
- 3,528
okay can u stop paraphrasing what we say? thank you
NO this is not what i said, i said that light has finite speed and it's logical for it to never cross an infinite distance (not in a lifetime at least)
- 3,493
- 1,360
This isn't how it works. You cannot make the claim that the darkness is a bigger infinity without evidence. You guys just made that up.
- 6,029
- 3,528
how do universes work in ur head
Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,220
- 14,571
doesn't matter, cause rational number have more than natural number, being larger than countable infinite doesn't necessary mean uncountable infinite, now we can stop this topic here
- 1,406
- 641
It's just standard logic tho, if a contains b, a must be larger than b.
- 2,154
- 799
I disagree for the reasons above. These aren't convincing anyone and anybody outside the DB circle that the scan, which shows the universe having an edge and center, isn't the author indicating that the universe is not infinite. Worse is that the feat supporting the "infinite" statement seemingly didn't even come from the manga or anime itself. Kind of reminds you that this is the same place where a blatant outlier can be disregarded if you have enough supporters.
- 1,967
- 1,664
- 6,029
- 3,528
apparently u must be a db fanatic to agree
also apparently outweighing evidence from canon guides is a blatant outlier
god
- 2,578
- 1,478
I just want to point that this is entirely wrong. The set of Rational Numbers has the exact same amount of elements as the set of Natural Numbers.
Q is not "larger" nor "bigger" than N. So, if you're basing your argument on this logic, please refrain to do so, since it is utterly not true.
- 12,191
- 6,123
- Thread starter
- #453
This looks good to me, someone can close this one and open another one, we have 10 long pages.
- 3,493
- 1,360
If there are infinite galaxies, then light should be infinite light. It doesn't matter if light has finite speed, there is infinite light. Unless you are arguing that the infinite light is somehow stuck in FINITE area?
This is what I am talking about. You cannot have infinite galaxies and infinite impenetrable darkness. They contradict each other.
This is objectively false!
- 6,029
- 3,528
this thread is a mess, have fun though
- 1,967
- 1,664
go to the Bigger than 2-A thread right now and take a few hours to read it completely. unless you can PROVE a transfinite difference, that space will NOT be uncountably infinitely large. can you please stop stonewalling? i don't wanna accuse you of anything but i have a bit of a suspicion this is just you taking your frustration of stonewalled SM threads out on this thread.
Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,220
- 14,571
if we go by the visual, it only show edge, not center
eh..................so what exactly you meant???, i can't understand this phase
here, the magic word: outlier
okay, but again for the last time, this have been talked to death in many threads about bigger than 2-A = low 1-C, bigger than countable infinite isn't necessary uncountable infinite
- 6,029
- 3,528
what's up with people putting words into my mouth today lmao
i said EIGHT (8) statements from guidebooks outweigh ONE (1) statement from the manga
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,062
- 1,768
Can you guys close this thread a better thread would be made with counter arguments by a knowledgeable member later even op agrees with closing this thread since it became a mess
- 70
- 36
This getting out of hand chill.
I ask everyone to please calm down and let us settle the next move (creating a new thread or what)
Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,220
- 14,571
- 1,967
- 1,664
this can be closed, and a future thread with summaries and key points from this one, along with any new arguments, can be made at a later date. AFAIK the vote is tied currently so it doesnt really matter.
the thread was incredibly rushed anyway as I stated very early on
the thread was incredibly rushed anyway as I stated very early on
- 3,493
- 1,360
Yeah. I'm done. If this is remade, I'll just post my same argument.
The fact that people are now claiming bigger countable infinites can exist and that the set of rational numbers is bigger than the set of natural numbers is my greenlight to exit this mess.
Are you that against the ropes that you have to rely on ad hominems and bad math?
The fact that people are now claiming bigger countable infinites can exist and that the set of rational numbers is bigger than the set of natural numbers is my greenlight to exit this mess.
Are you that against the ropes that you have to rely on ad hominems and bad math?
- 31,348
- 27,600
@LuffyRuffy46307 You're the OP. Do you want the thread closed as some other users have suggested?
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,062
- 1,768
- 12,191
- 6,123
- Thread starter
- #469
Okay, i hope the next crt will be soon.
- Status
