Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Characters can in-universe be stronger than each other, but that doesn't mean they upscale in trans-fictional comparison. It's like an infinitely strong character might be weaker than a infinitely +1 strong character, but that doesn't mean that the infinitely +1 strong character is stronger than an infinitely strong character from another verse. After all, the infinitely strong character could, in comparison, have been infinite -1 strong in the other verse. The metric doesn't hold up to trans-fictional comparison.The 1,920x comes from a scaling chain, showing that character's are more powerful than each other, with values that were created through reasoning. So to just say that 1,920 x infinity doesn't exist, is exactly like saying the characters in TTGL don't get anymore powerful after Simon integrated the Multiverse. Significantly affecting a single 11 dimensional infinite universe is an infinite baseline, and significantly affecting an infinite collection of infinite universes or an infinite multiverse, would reasonably be infinity^2 times baseline. This is already accepted, as you've said, significantly affecting an entire multiverse is better than a single universe. But the third infinity comes from Spiral Power being stacked on top of Simon already having an infinite multiverse. The argument was never that there was more than one infinite multiverse. And to completely disregard Spiral Power as stacking another infinity on top, is exactly like saying that Simon without Spiral Power is as powerful as Simon with Spiral Power, which is absolutely not true at all. Then there's 1,920 x Infinity^3 via a scaling chain, because the characters do indeed get more powerful. So yeah, this has already been officially accepted
I mean, there is a difference between the multiverse being 11D, one universe being 11D and every one of infinite universes being 11D. I have admittedly not read the entire thing. That's why I ask.Of course, this has been shown in the blog that GreatIskandar sent like numerous times here. The entire Multiverse is multilayered with 11 dimensions as per Work Soul
Not really, but it doesn't really matter. If Simon can't enter the place the fight takes place in he would lose due to BFR.Regardless Simon always has his cosmology around with him. Has the non-existent area ever made something of that structure just disappear?
So how would that be a feat of resisting something just overwriting your mind then? Seems like fundamentally different stuff.If it's not the same thing, the Extradimensional Labyrinth doesn't work like that, it not only traps one mind into infinite branching paths but rather, it forces one mind to perceive infinite possibilities simultaneously, feeling of being an infinite number of people across on different universes, all at once.
Soooo... how does being some mind/energy being imply resisting soul hax? Still missing that step.I will say his abstraction would prevent that, his Abstract Existence was misunderstood being akin conciousness, mind or something alike which is not true by the way. Simon's Abstract Existence is an abstraction of Spiral Power, taking a shape of thought (or actually emotion, hope, willpower or anything alike) that encompasses his entire selves (and universes) throughout the multiverse, in all universes and all points of time, it can as well be combined with a spacetime like the Super Spiral Universe aka TTGL itself. Because Spiral Power is fundamental, it is a power source of evolution that makes up the reality as the underpinning of The Universe.
Did I ever mention more than one multiverse? No, the 3rd infinity comes from Simon having infinite Spiral Power, on top of have an entire Multiverse as a part of him. If you want to downgrade Simon, go ahead and try to do it in content revision, because anyone who is actually knowledgeable in the series will straight up disagree with you. You just keep strawmanning, by saying my argument for the 3rd infinity was because of more than one multiverseSo yeah, nothing except the infinite multiverse stuff actually is meaningful.
Why do you even think that this makes any whatsoever sense? This is like saying every single 2-A character is baseline in relation to each other, regardless of the scaling chain in whatever 2-A verse, because its infinity regardless. If course, everything equals infinity in the end, but each respective verse treats these characters as if they were above baseline, so why are you saying that we SHOULDN'T treat them as such?It's like an infinitely strong character might be weaker than a infinitely +1 strong character, but that doesn't mean that the infinitely +1 strong character is stronger than an infinitely strong character from another verse
Well as @GreatIskandar14045 explained, Simon can exist in a place of Non-Existence, via still existing after the Big Crunch, which is the collapsing of the universe, bringing it to absolute nothingness. But it isn't just matter, because the Big Bang in TTGL is explicitly the creation of the entire universe, aka the entire cosmology, because Anti-Spiral uses the word "universe" in context to the entirety of TTGL itself. It's logical that the inverse of the Big Bang, which is the Big Crunch, would also collapse everything, including time itself. And it does matter that he has his cosmology. In the end, he'll always be in a place that exists, because of the Multiverse being connected to him, it ultimately goes where ever he does. The void does not have any feats of erasing something of this size and structure. Therefore, the "BFR into a Non-Existent realm" argument is utterly pointless, as he can exist in non-existence and his physiology makes it so that there's something thereIf Simon can't enter the place the fight takes place in he would lose due to BFR
He's not understanding that a Big Crunch only constitutes, compression of all mass and energy into a singularity and I don't know how else to put it. The standards page also agrees with this shurgs. He also seems to be extrapolating time and space are erased by appealing to visuals and the vague transcending time and space with no context, as you said before, when the evidence is simply not there. Not that a big crunch/big bang remotely equates to an imaginary void of nonexistence that Chimera produces so we're pretty much arguing a moot point.What's that entire Big Bang/Big Crunch argument about btw.?
Well, sorry if I misunderstood. I think I got confused by you saying affecting 11D was the first infinity, since I assumed we were talking about baseline 11D not baseline High 1-C. In that case, Chimera has that infinity, too, though. Infinite spiral power doesn't stack beyond simply infinite multiverse or at least it would need better evidence than just infinite power being there.Did I ever mention more than one multiverse? No, the 3rd infinity comes from Simon having infinite Spiral Power, on top of have an entire Multiverse as a part of him. If you want to downgrade Simon, go ahead and try to do it in content revision, because anyone who is actually knowledgeable in the series will straight up disagree with you. You just keep strawmanning, by saying my argument for the 3rd infinity was because of more than one multiverse
Because infinity has no baseline. You can have half of infinite power and still be in the same tier, with the same infinities. Without objective baseline, being 2x the baseline wouldn't equate to being stronger.Why do you even think that this makes any whatsoever sense? This is like saying every single 2-A character is baseline in relation to each other, regardless of the scaling chain in whatever 2-A verse, because its infinity regardless. If course, everything equals infinity in the end, but each respective verse treats these characters as if they were above baseline, so why are you saying that we SHOULDN'T treat them as such?
Well, a few things. For one, scientifically neither the big bang nor the big crunch create or destroy spacetime. Not sure if TTGL has any particular statements regarding the subject that change that.Well as @GreatIskandar14045 explained, Simon can exist in a place of Non-Existence, via still existing after the Big Crunch, which is the collapsing of the universe, bringing it to absolute nothingness. But it isn't just matter, because the Big Bang in TTGL is explicitly the creation of the entire universe, aka the entire cosmology, because Anti-Spiral uses the word "universe" in context to the entirety of TTGL itself. It's logical that the inverse of the Big Bang, which is the Big Crunch, would also collapse everything, including time itself. And it does matter that he has his cosmology. In the end, he'll always be in a place that exists, because of the Multiverse being connected to him, it ultimately goes where ever he does. The void does not have any feats of erasing something of this size and structure. Therefore, the "BFR into a Non-Existent realm" argument is utterly pointless, as he can exist in non-existence and his physiology makes it so that there's something there
Because the thread is long and I might have missed some votes.Not sure why my vote for Chimera wasn't counted.
I wouldn't go that far, although I currently think Chimera has pretty good chances with law/soul hax, too. I guess I vote Chimera for the time being to get this out of grace.Clearly, any AP difference (doubtful that there's even any) here is negligible
although in BFR it doesn't work, because Simon himself can return to the Realm forcibly as in the case of Simon entering the Anti spiral realm by TeleportHe isn't getting BFR'd into the realm, he is getting BFR'd out of it. He can have his cosmology, but he will need to have it somewhere else.
Returning to a different realm is not the same as entering non-existent space. That's false equivalence.Simon can't do anything in the hidden world as proven above.although in BFR it doesn't work, because Simon himself can return to the Realm forcibly as in the case of Simon entering the Anti spiral realm by Teleport
Characters can in-universe be stronger than each other, but that doesn't mean they upscale in trans-fictional comparison. It's like an infinitely strong character might be weaker than a infinitely +1 strong character, but that doesn't mean that the infinitely +1 strong character is stronger than an infinitely strong character from another verse. After all, the infinitely strong character could, in comparison, have been infinite -1 strong in the other verse. The metric doesn't hold up to trans-fictional comparison.
No...?Well, sorry if I misunderstood. I think I got confused by you saying affecting 11D was the first infinity, since I assumed we were talking about baseline 11D not baseline High 1-C. In that case, Chimera has that infinity, too, though. Infinite spiral power doesn't stack beyond simply infinite multiverse or at least it would need better evidence than just infinite power being there.
And let's not get into "every knowledgable member would agree"-stuff. A bad argument and, believe me, much of the To Aru crowd would agree with a lot of upgrades that aren't applied for (in my opinion) good reasons.
Because infinity has no baseline. You can have half of infinite power and still be in the same tier, with the same infinities. Without objective baseline, being 2x the baseline wouldn't equate to being stronger.
That's pretty much also why it was agreed busting 2 infinite multiverses isn't higher range than having busted 1. Whether you bust 2 infinite multiverses or 2 halves of one, is the same thing. It's just described differently on a subjective basis.
You can be higher than baseline, but it needs an argument that upholds within the ambiguity of what "baseline" is for an infinite tier.
"We evolve beyond the person we were a minute before! Little by little, we advance a bit further with each turn. That's how a drill works!!"
No one said a multiple set of infinite multiverse being higher than an infinite multiverse, we all knows that (well probably not for Toaru folks here since they seem to lack knowledge regarding how Tiering System works). Chain scalings and reactive evolution definitely are still things.In infinite multiverses isn't higher than an infinite multiverse. Those are the same thing. See the tiering system FAQ on that.
Exactly, we are all aware of that and as I said, the universes are branched out via quantum cosmology. If there's 11D universes in the 11D multi-layered multiverse then there's an infinite number of 11D universes, also 4D universes are quiet much nonexistent as they are never mentioned at all, Gurren Lagann adapted M-theory with brane cosmology, to be precise.I mean, there is a difference between the multiverse being 11D, one universe being 11D and every one of infinite universes being 11D. I have admittedly not read the entire thing. That's why I ask.
This will be brought up by other arguments, see below.Not really, but it doesn't really matter. If Simon can't enter the place the fight takes place in he would lose due to BFR.
Then mind to elaborate how Chimera's mind manipulation is anything as impressive, then? If that doesn't make much difference then how the hell do we determine the potential of mind manipulation?So how would that be a feat of resisting something just overwriting your mind then? Seems like fundamentally different stuff.
How does being an abstraction of a power source that resides deeper than the whole cosmology is just something akin being conventional mind/energy?Soooo... how does being some mind/energy being imply resisting soul hax? Still missing that step.
In TTGL they kind of do, a Big Bang create a universe and a Big Crunch collapses a universe, after the universe is collapses everything becomes the realm of nothingness. It is not just being outside time and space since there's nothing left outside of it, they were fighting at the edge of the multiverse.Well, a few things. For one, scientifically neither the big bang nor the big crunch create or destroy spacetime. Not sure if TTGL has any particular statements regarding the subject that change that.
Second, existing outside spacetime isn't equivalent to existing in non-existence. We are talking about a place that, should it get a location profile (which might not be a bad idea), would have something like NEP Type 2 listed.
And lastly, you are misinterpreting my argument. I'm not saying Simon gets BFR'd into a void. I'm saying Chimera turns the place they are fighting in into a void and Simon exists outside of it. He isn't getting BFR'd into the realm, he is getting BFR'd out of it. He can have his cosmology, but he will need to have it somewhere else.
That's where the source of your denialism comes from, you insist that it simply compresses mass and energy into a singularity after so many implications that it is more than that. I don't like being that person but, if you don't know anything about the context then maybe staying silent and put down your ignorance is the best option.He's not understanding that a Big Crunch only constitutes, compression of all mass and energy into a singularity and I don't know how else to put it. The standards page also agrees with this shurgs. He also seems to be extrapolating time and space are erased by appealing to visuals and the vague transcending time and space with no context, as you said before, when the evidence is simply not there. Not that a big crunch/big bang remotely equates to an imaginary void of nonexistence that Chimera produces so we're pretty much arguing a moot point.
^^^Also, it is very ironic for you to say that since our standards already said that an infinite multiplier of Low 2-C is unable to reach 2-A because the range between them universes is unknownable, aka an infinite 11D universe to infinite 11D universes on this case.
Can you tell me which point of DT didn't get countered?After reading, Chimera FRA. I don't think DT points were sufficiently addressed.
All of them.Can you tell me which point of DT didn't get countered?
Because?Maybe I miss something but did DT even explain why can soul and mind hax affect HDE?Or why can law hax bypass acausal type 4? Sorry for these questions but I just want to make sure that you actually read this damn thread instead of following the FRA trainAll of them.
U don't need to make sure of anything. Cause I really am just following the FRA train.Because?Maybe I miss something but did DT even explain why can soul and mind hax affect HDE?Or why can law hax bypass acausal type 4? Sorry for these questions but I just want to make sure that you actually read this damn thread instead of following the FRA train
So afterall you still don't have any reason to explain how can soul and mind hax affect HDE? Saying "no concrete counter" without further explanation literally makes no sense,and who tell you that being abstraction is the only reason for resistance to mind hax? He resists it because he can escape AS's labyrinth duhIn all seriousness,
The counter argument for Simon not being able to operate in Chimera's nonexistence flat out makes no sense.
Chimera's probability hax is superior.
No real concrete counter for the passive and active soul hax.
The counter arguments for why Simon's mind resistance to Chimera's hax is relevant/why Chimera can't effect an abstraction of things she can easily control is nebulous/muddled and difficult to parse through.
How Simon's acausality hax fits in seems interesting but I don't believe the fight ever gets that far.
Elaborate.The counter argument for Simon not being able to operate in Chimera's nonexistence flat out makes no sense.
That's debatable, and Simon should immune any conventional probability hax due to him encompassing all kinds of possibilities of himself whether that are already existed or will exist, on all universes and all points of time. Also Abstract Existence.Chimera's probability hax is superior.
Abstract Existence.No real concrete counter for the passive and active soul hax.
Simple, can Chimera affect an abstraction that work as the center, or fundamental power source that governs everything in the Universe? Because that's what the Spiral Power does.The counter arguments for why Simon's mind resistance to Chimera's hax is relevant/why Chimera can't effect an abstraction of things she can easily control is nebulous/muddled and difficult to parse through.
I don't underestand why would y'll kept bringing acausality stuffs, when it almost had nothing to do with the arguments that were already presented? Why?How Simon's acausality hax fits in seems interesting but I don't believe the fight ever gets that far.
Acausality type 4 being immune to To Aru’s Law Manipulation. That’s the part it playedWhy?
I'm actually not sure about Type 4 being immune to law hax, I thought they were talking about Type 2 = probability hax resistance, something I never used as the underlying of my arguments.Acausality type 4 being immune to To Aru’s Law Manipulation. That’s the part it played