• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Shouldn't Lord Boros and Saitama be Moon level?

Status
Not open for further replies.
369
97
I did a little digging and found out that the Energy required to destroy the surface of the Earth (completely, along with mountains and stuff) is more than the Energy required to destroy the Moon.

1.5*10^30 = The energy required to destroy the surface of Earth.

1.24*10^29 = The energy required to blow-up the moon.

Correct me if I am wrong, I am no expert at this, was just informing.
 
LordGriffin1000 said:
I thought it was Multi-Continent level.
I know, that's what is written on their pages, but if they are able to output more Energy than it is required to blow-up the moon, shouldn't they be upgraded to Tier 5-C?
 
Gonna need some math for this because this feat has been calced multiple times and the result as never been above High 6-A
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Gonna need some math for this because this feat has been calced multiple times and the result as never been above High 6-A
Yeah, hopefully the Calc group can notice this thread. The thing is, we have never seen what would happen if the Roaring Star Cannon hit Earth. I just went by what is written on Boros' profile.
 
It depends on what level of surface level destruction occurs.

Life-wiping like a Meteor that wiped out the Dinosaurs isn't going to be very impressive while Boros could alternatively be referring to the entire Upper Mantle, giving much higher results.
 
Yeah you should probably write up a calc, explaining how you arrived at those numbers.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
I...what? You gave numbers but have no math to back up what you said in the OP? How does that make any sense?
I already said "I did a little digging", what I mean by that is, I found these numbers from the Internet. The energy required to destroy the surface of the Earth was pretty hard to find, but here is the site I got it from: http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/usefultables.php

And for the Moon, you can find it on many websites.
 
Akreious said:
It depends on what level of surface level destruction occurs.
Life-wiping like a Meteor that wiped out the Dinosaurs isn't going to be very impressive while Boros could alternatively be referring to the entire Upper Mantle, giving much higher results.
I think he can completely destroy the crust of the Earth as it is written that he can "shave" and "ruin" the Earth.
 
So the description for that number is "Energy required blow off Terra's crust into space"

Since that doesn't have any explanation behind it, and I don't think there's a way to figure out how they would have gotten that number, we'd be better off trusting calculations done by our members which we can verify.
 
Agnaa said:
So the description for that number is "Energy required blow off Terra's crust into space"
Since that doesn't have any explanation behind it, and I don't think there's a way to figure out how they would have gotten that number, we'd be better off trusting calculations done by our members which we can verify.
True, it's disappointing they didn't link to the calculation for it. I will be looking for any other websites where there are proper calculations for it (if any).
 
@Agnaa, the TNT equivalent is given there. I think that is what they are using to calculate the Energy. Relatively, of course. Still not sure, though.

Also, can anyone link the calc for the Multi-continent tier?
 
Agreed, have seen many people cite this site, though. But, that's beside the point. Will continue to search.

Anyways, can you link the calculation for the Multi-Continental feat?
 
Apatheticskell said:
Agreed with 5-C(he should be 5-B though)
Well, he isnt since Murata said that his words are non canon. So, about him being Planet busting was not canon, hence the mods can not use it, they can only use what has been shown up till now. And, frankly, I like that. Thats how it should be. Although, I would go for Low 5C for Saitama, the Calculation done by the team makes sense.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
This is what we currently use for surface wiping
Actually, I think there's a problem with that calc, he used the airburst explosion formula (explosions that occur in the air) instead of the surface explosion formula, which is for the explosions that occur at ground level.

Earth's circumference / 2 = 20040 km or 20040000 m

W = R^3*((27136*P + 8649)^(1/2)/13568 - 93/13568)^2

W is yield in tons of tnt, R is radius in meters, and P is pressure of the shockwave in bars, the standard overpressure is 20 psi or 1.37895 bars.

W = 20040000^3*((27136*1.37895 + 8649)^(1/2)/13568 - 93/13568)^2 = 646812891015665675.88 Tons of TNT

Yield = 646.81 Petatons of TNT

It's just a slightly upgrade.
 
Actually, I think there's a problem with that calc, he used the airburst explosion formula (explosions that occur in the air) instead of the surface explosion formula, which is for the explosions that occur on the surface.

Earth's circumference / 2 = 20040 km or 20040000 m

W = R^3*((27136*P + 8649)^(1/2)/13568 - 93/13568)^2

W is yield in tons of tnt, R is radius in meters, and P is pressure of the shockwave in bars, the standard overpressure is 20 psi or 1.37895 bars.

W = 20040000^3*((27136*1.37895 + 8649)^(1/2)/13568 - 93/13568)^2 = 646812891015665675.88 Tons of TNT

Yield = 646.81 Petatons of TNT

It's just a slightly upgrade.

Is that the Minimum yield? Because the Max he calculated in 1 minute was 17.15 Exatonnes.
 
Yes, that is the minimum yield for timeframeless surface bust.
 
If we are using the explosion formula for Boros' feat and the value in the OP comes from blowing the Earth's crust into space (which I guess is a KE feat), then it's obvious that there can't be an upgrade.
 
IIRC the OBD calc for the same thing yields a much lower result than even High 6-A.
 
@AKM the "blasting the crust into space thing" or "creating an explosion across the earth's surface"?
 
Andytrenom said:
@AKM the "blasting the crust into space thing" or "creating an explosion across the earth's surface"?
According to how Boros says it, I am inclined to think that he can completrly destroy the Earths crust. Leaving nothing but hot magma pouring out.
 
If you were to use the value I provided, and put it in Boros' formula, how can it not be upgraded? There is more kinetic Energy, right? Am I missing something?
 
Because we don't know how the value was derived, we can't use it.
 
It was never displayed on-screen so we can't make any assumptions about what it would it do other than destroy the Earth's surface.

"Destroying the Earth's surface" has a general calc, which is what we can use in this case.
 
Agnaa said:
Because we don't know how the value was derived, we can't use it.
I know, I am talking about what if it was used. There would be an increase, right? This is what Andy said: "If we are using the explosion formula for Boros' feat and the value in the OP comes from blowing the Earth's crust into space (which I guess is a KE feat), then it's obvious that there can't be an upgrade."

I am confused about the last part.
 
Without the feat being demonstrated the most you can give it is a High 6A rating.
 
I think I should state this.

The 511 Pettaton calc is STILL on Boros's page

That should likely be removed and replaced with Kep's 366
 
Ask Kep to make a blog about it (if he hasn't already) and I'll gladly change it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top