• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Sans Fights a 2-A Character

The Context says otherwise

No it proves humans can take less than one damage, that part you said is headcanon based on nothing and is just trying to prove yourself right
You literally said Frisk was reducing damage, if the only instance of someone taking less than 1 damage was with damage reduction and vice versa then it's safe to assume that was because of the damage reduction especially given this is the strongest character in the verse doing an attack that is dealing less damage than a common enemy you find in the first area of the game, but this should be discussed in some other thread anyways
 
You literally said Frisk was reducing damage, if the only instance of someone taking less than 1 damage was with damage reduction and vice versa then it's safe to assume that was because of the damage reduction especially given this is the strongest character in the verse doing an attack that is dealing less damage than a common enemy you find in the first area of the game, but this should be discussed in some other thread anyways
You are ignoring how this either way shows they can take less than 1 damage
 
Late response, but again, that wouldn't work since their dura neg is limited. Sans attacks would be doing 0 damage to someone with 2-A durability.
not at all, sans is the exception to that rule, he deals the same damage regardless of your durability, why do you think that he has a unique description of dura neg than the physiology page?
 
not at all, sans is the exception to that rule, he deals the same damage regardless of your durability, why do you think that he has a unique description of dura neg than the physiology page?
Because of KARMA, which while it is true durability negation, it cannot drop your HP to zero. Sans cannot kill someone he cannot chip, which is why he can never defeat a character with High 3-A durability or higher.
 
Because of KARMA, which while it is true durability negation, it cannot drop your HP to zero. Sans cannot kill someone he cannot chip
not at all since Sans' own damage stays the same regardless, his attacks are never said to be chip damage, his phases through your durability, and when he applies KR with you at HP 1 you immediatly die, the poison effect resultant form KR can't kill, that is correct, however, KR aplication can, which is how Sans kills frisk in the first place

, which is why he can never defeat a character with High 3-A durability or higher.
you need a thread to make that accepted, since nothing of such is listed or was chip damage ever accepted as what Sans does at all
 
not at all, sans is the exception to that rule, he deals the same damage regardless of your durability, why do you think that he has a unique description of dura neg than the physiology page?
Sans soul attack dura neg isn't noted on the profile to dura neg any different from any other monster... the only one he has that's different is Karma, but that has different limitations.
 
when he applies KR with you at HP 1 you immediatly die
KARMA is the poison effect, it does not immediately deal 1HP of damage upon application, it's Sans' normal monster magic that deals that damage. He has 1ATK.

you need a thread to make that accepted
I don't, because the limited nature of Monster's durability negation is already accepted. People have just either overlooked it or ignored it for Sans, even though the only special thing about his dura neg is his KARMA- which can't even kill you.
 
Sans soul attack dura neg isn't noted on the profile to dura neg any different from any other monster...
yes it is....hence why he has Karma listed

the only one he has that's different is Karma, but that has different limitations.
not one's that really matter for this manner

KARMA is the poison effect, it does not immediately deal 1HP of damage upon application
it does, that is why Sans' deals 1 hp per frame of damage

it's Sans' normal monster magic that deals that damage. He has 1ATK.
of course, you have proof for such claims right? also, even if it was like that, that is still durability negation since he is dealing the same ammount of damage no matter how high or small your durability is, if it was chip damage as you headcanoned said it is, then said chip damage would vary depending on the durability of frisk, dealing less with higher and more with less, which is a thing that doesn't happen at all

I don't, because the limited nature of Monster's durability negation is already accepted.
and in the thread that made it a thing it was agreed that Sans was the exception by everyone there, moot point

People have just either overlooked it or ignored it for Sans, even though the only special thing about his dura neg is his KARMA- which can't even kill you.
outside of the fact that it pretty much can kill you, it was not an oversight, it was an agreement on him not being affected in the thread, you not agreeing with it personally is another story tho
 
it does, that is why Sans' deals 1 hp per frame of damage
not ever confirmed nor would allow him to kill Galactus
of course, you have proof for such claims right? also, even if it was like that, that is still durability negation since he is dealing the same ammount of damage no matter how high or small your durability is, if it was chip damage as you headcanoned said it is, then said chip damage would vary depending on the durability of frisk, dealing less with higher and more with less, which is a thing that doesn't happen at all
this
and in the thread that made it a thing it was agreed that Sans was the exception by everyone there, moot point
because karma
 
yes it is....hence why he has Karma listed
Then you agree, Sans soul damage is no different from the rest of the monsters. If you disagree, make a CRT for it, since the wiki treats it as being the same.
not one's that really matter for this manner
Except they do, since Karma can't kill you at 1 HP which has been discussed extensively at this point.
 
it does, that is why Sans' deals 1 hp per frame of damage
That's untrue. He deals 1HP per frame because the SOUL has no invulnerability frames in Sans' fight, and Sans' attack don't vanish upon hitting the SOUL.

that is still durability negation since he is dealing the same ammount of damage no matter how high or small your durability is, if it was chip damage as you headcanoned said it is, then said chip damage would vary depending on the durability of frisk, dealing less with higher and more with less, which is a thing that doesn't happen at all
He only has 1ATK. And the minimum damage that can normally be dealt is 1HP, with the exception of GoHD Asriel.

and in the thread that made it a thing it was agreed that Sans was the exception by everyone there, moot point
Because of KARMA, which is true dura neg, but cannot drop your HP to zero.

outside of the fact that it pretty much can kill you
Again, untrue. KARMA explicitly cannot kill you.

This is starting to result in a repetition of arguments, so I'm not making these points again unless new evidence of the contrary appears.
 
not ever confirmed
very much is since that is the effect that is spawned with his every attack

nor would allow him to kill Galactus
it very much would

i don't see why i should care about a fan wiki's explanation, could you give me evidence of the game instead pherhaps?

because karma
yeah, hence why he kills so fast

Then you agree
not at all

, Sans soul damage is no different from the rest of the monsters.
it is since his ignores you durability completely, while the others do not

If you disagree, make a CRT for it, since the wiki treats it as being the same.
the wiki pretty much doesn't, no where written, and in his profile, KR is listed as his Durability neg, and in the thread for soul attacks sans was always listed as the exception, this is how he is treated in the wiki, make a thread yourself if you disagree

Except they do, since Karma can't kill you at 1 HP which has been discussed extensively at this point.
yes, it pretty much can, hence why Sans can kill and harm you the same regardless of your durability in the first place, what can't kill in the poisonous effect of it alone, but the application he does with every attack very much can

That's untrue. He deals 1HP per frame because the SOUL has no invulnerability frames in Sans' fight, and Sans' attack don't vanish upon hitting the SOUL.
yeah, hence his durability neg, since normal defense gets bypassed and ignored by him

He only has 1ATK. And the minimum damage that can normally be dealt is 1HP, with the exception of GoHD Asriel.
considering that he doesn't damage the same way as all monsters, no, there is no statement of what you are saying, we don't know if he would be able to do that without KR, we see that this is how he does the stuff he does, you affirming this without making accepted in the wiki in the first place is weird, you say that it is one thing, you can't use non accepted conclusions in a VS thread, that is just silly

Because of KARMA, which is true dura neg, but cannot drop your HP to zero.
the poison effect can't, KR aplication very much can, hence why his attacks can kill in the first place

Again, untrue. KARMA explicitly cannot kill you.
the poison effect, KR can kill you

This is starting to result in a repetition of arguments, so I'm not making these points again unless new evidence of the contrary appears.
you are the one affirming a thing that is never implied or said in the game, while i am using something accepted here in the wiki that is implied in the game, you are the one who should start bringing evidence, because you haven't brought anything as of now
 
the wiki pretty much doesn't, no where written, and in his profile, KR is listed as his Durability neg, and in the thread for soul attacks sans was always listed as the exception, this is how he is treated in the wiki, make a thread yourself if you disagree
He's clearly not treated this way on the wiki since it's not at all noted on his profile. So I'm sorry to say it Omega, but you'll actually need to make a CRT to have your currently head canon accepted. It's not my fault the wiki doesn't list his soul manip as working differently than anyone else. I'm not going to make a thread for you about something that isn't even on the profile. That's just being lazy imo.
yes, it pretty much can, hence why Sans can kill and harm you the same regardless of your durability in the first place, what can't kill in the poisonous effect of it alone, but the application he does with every attack very much can
He has two types of of durability negation. A limited one via his physiology, and Karma, which can't kill you as explained earlier as it IS the poisonous affect that can only bring you to 1 HP. I can't help you unless you read my earlier posts. So I refuse to keep arguing about this with you when you're clearly misconstruing what's on the profile. Either that or you're arguing from incredulity.
 
yeah, hence his durability neg, since normal defense gets bypassed and ignored by him
His normal damage that is limited dura neg is affected by regular durability, and his true dura neg, KARMA, cannot kill.

considering that he doesn't damage the same way as all monsters
He does, his boss fight just lacks invincibility frames & he has KARMA.

the poison effect can't, KR aplication very much can, hence why his attacks can kill in the first place

the poison effect, KR can kill you
You're making yourself look silly now. KARMA cannot kill you. Your last point of HP cannot be affected by KARMA. This can be discovered by playing the Sans fight, or looking it up, so please stop claiming something so clearly false.

you are the one affirming a thing that is never implied or said in the game, while i am using something accepted here in the wiki that is implied in the game, you are the one who should start bringing evidence, because you haven't brought anything as of now
You're the one ignoring what the profiles say and what the game shows.
 
very much is since that is the effect that is spawned with his every attack
I am pretty sure that the profile says the opposite
it very much would
you evidence being?
i don't see why i should care about a fan wiki's explanation, could you give me evidence of the game instead pherhaps?
I mean this proves it’s chip damage.
yeah, hence why he kills so fast
only partial true and irrelevant to the match at hand
 
He's clearly not treated this way on the wiki since it's not at all noted on his profile. So I'm sorry to say it Omega, but you'll actually need to make a CRT to have your currently head canon accepted.
Considering that your side was the one who brought up the whole "it is only chip damage" headcanon, while the profile does have the durability negation of KR that i am talking, no, i don't need to, since IT IS accepted

It's not my fault the wiki doesn't list his soul manip as working differently than anyone else.
his durability neg is not soul manipulation, since it also ignores physical durability, so moot point

I'm not going to make a thread for you about something that isn't even on the profile. That's just being lazy imo.
it is not as lazy as not making a thread, inventing something not implied in the game, and then somehow expecting to buy it just because the inner details are not written in the profile, you know that his was the only one not listed as limited aftet the crt was finished? It isn't something never brought up and never accepted, it was brought up and then accepted in the crt

He has two types of of durability negation. A limited one via his physiology, and Karma, which can't kill you as explained earlier as it IS the poisonous affect that can only bring you to 1 HP.
nope, accepted in the crt for soul attacks that his isn't limited, that was accepted, hence why he never had a "limited" on his durabilitu negation after that crt was passed

I can't help you unless you read my earlier posts.
i did do that

So I refuse to keep arguing about this with you when you're clearly misconstruing what's on the profile. Either that or you're arguing from incredulity.
I am not, you are, just look at the history of revisions of the profile and try and see when was sans listed with the same "limited" that everyone in undertale was, Hint, he never had, the one going against the profile is you, not me

His normal damage that is limited dura neg is affected by regular durability
it isn't, again, when the thread was applied, his was not affect by hit, stop going against the accepted revisions

and his true dura neg, KARMA, cannot kill.
Yes it can, you ignoring the explanation will not make it go away

He does, his boss fight just lacks invincibility frames
hence why his durability neg was never listed as limited in the first place

& he has KARMA.
so?

You're making yourself look silly now. KARMA cannot kill you. Your last point of HP cannot be affected by KARMA. This can be discovered by playing the Sans fight, or looking it up, so please stop claiming something so clearly false.
I played the fight, it can kill you, it is the whole reason sans does the damage the way he does in the first place

You're the one ignoring what the profiles say and what the game shows.
No, you are the one doing that, really, crts are what determines what is accepted or not, and crt's determine that Sans doesn't the limitation that youbare arguing, so please, stop going against what was accepted


I am pretty sure that the profile says the opposite
It says none of that, at all

you evidence being?
Why would i repeat myself yet again?

I mean this proves it’s chip damage.
It doesn't, at all, my dude, this isn't accepted in the profile or in any Crt, you can't act as if it is just because it makes sense to you

only partial true and irrelevant to the match at hand
It is completely relevant to the threas at hand
 
I'm not gonna respond to a flat-out denial of the truth. My previous statements remain the same, and are backed up by the game and the profiles.
 
Considering that your side was the one who brought up the whole "it is only chip damage" headcanon, while the profile does have the durability negation of KR that i am talking, no, i don't need to, since IT IS accepted
I dunno what the chip damage stuff is even about... I've been ignoring everything outside of people who directly addressed me since I'm not here to vote. Just to inform.
his durability neg is not soul manipulation, since it also ignores physical durability, so moot point
Not on the profile. Irrelevant so I'm not addressing it since you'll just resort to circular arguments.
it is not as lazy as not making a thread, inventing something not implied in the game, and then somehow expecting to buy it just because the inner details are not written in the profile, you know that his was the only one not listed as limited aftet the crt was finished? It isn't something never brought up and never accepted, it was brought up and then accepted in the crt
Why would something THIS important not be listed on the profile. Being the ONE exception of a universal physiology DEFINITELY warrants being noted on the profile. This isn't my problem, this is the people claiming Sans physiology is intrinsically differently SOLELY in the dura neg department. Get that fixed, if it's true it wouldn't be hard.
nope, accepted in the crt for soul attacks that his isn't limited, that was accepted, hence why he never had a "limited" on his durabilitu negation after that crt was passed
Show me where it was accepted this only Sans durability negation via attacking the soul is different (And don't link me anything talking about Karma since that's a completely different form of dura neg he has access too, thus why he has dura neg listed on his profile PLUS monster physiology listed on his page which links to limited dura neg)
I am not, you are, just look at the history of revisions of the profile and try and see when was sans listed with the same "limited" that everyone in undertale was, Hint, he never had, the one going against the profile is you, not me
NO ONE in the verse has limited durability negation listed on their profile. They all have the monster physiology page listed on their profile which includes limited dura neg via attacking the soul. Sans ALSO has the monster physiology listed on his profile with said limited durability neg. That was in my very first comment.
 
I'm not gonna respond to a flat-out denial of the truth. My previous statements remain the same, and are backed up by the game and the profiles.
It isn't by either, but ok, be like that, the truth wilm remain the same
 
I dunno what the chip damage stuff is even about... I've been ignoring everything outside of people who directly addressed me since I'm not here to vote. Just to inform.
Ok then

Not on the profile. Irrelevant so I'm not addressing it since you'll just resort to circular arguments.
Kr not killing also isn't in the profiles, yet you are saying that it is

Why would something THIS important not be listed on the profile. Being the ONE exception of a universal physiology DEFINITELY warrants being noted on the profile.
It was, people just ****** it up when making the physiology page, it is a simple errot to be fixed. Or rather a simple detail to add to avoid confusion

This isn't my problem, this is the people claiming Sans physiology is intrinsically differently SOLELY in the dura neg department.
i mean.....KR is basically that

Get that fixed, if it's true it wouldn't be hard.
i will

Show me where it was accepted this only Sans durability negation via attacking the soul is different (And don't link me anything talking about Karma since that's a completely different form of dura neg he has access too, thus why he has dura neg listed on his profile PLUS monster physiology listed on his page which links to limited dura neg)

The OP of the thread made it clear that Sans wasn't affected by it at all

NO ONE in the verse has limited durability negation listed on their profile. They all have the monster physiology page listed on their profile which includes limited dura neg via attacking the soul. Sans ALSO has the monster physiology listed on his profile with said limited durability neg. That was in my very first comment.
Look at before the physiology page was added dude, you can't be this blind to the point being made
 
I played the fight, it can kill you, it is the whole reason sans does the damage the way he does in the first place
Not here to argue the rest, but this is false. Karma can never kill the opponent. Could open the bad time simulator right now and double check, but Karma will get the enemy to a critical condition then never finish the job until Sans does. In this video, Karma overloads the hit points that Chara can take with damage to spare but never comes to take that one last point even though the players had been long at 1 HP.

Karma can leave the enemy at critical condition, never kill.
 
Not here to argue the rest, but this is false. Karma can never kill the opponent. Could open the bad time simulator right now and double check, but Karma will get the enemy to a critical condition then never finish the job until Sans does the final hit. You can see in this video multiple times that Karma overloads the hits that Chara can take with damage to spare but never comes to take that one last blow even though the players had been long at 1 HP.

Karma can leave the enemy at critical condition, never kill.
Here in the wiki we accept that sans dealing 1 damage per hit is via Karma, that is just how it is
 
Here in the wiki we accept that sans dealing 1 damage per hit is via Karma, that is just how it is
I never contested that he can do 1 damage per hit with Karma. The point is that Karma effectively can't seal the deal. And I gave the source material's evidence. Things that never happened in the source material being accepted is plain misconception being spread in threads. At this point people wouldn't be arguing with me, they'd be saying that exactly what happened in the game didn't.
 
Teleport trought.

And Sans can kill Galactus before he uses the drone.
isn't it his starting move tho?

I never contested that he can do 1 damage per hit with Karma. The point is that Karma effectively can't seal the deal. And I gave the source material's evidence. Things that never happened in the source material being accepted is plain misconception being spread in threads. At this point people wouldn't be arguing with me, they'd be saying that exactly what happened in the game didn't.
Well, we acceted that all damage related stuff Sans does to be dura neg via karm, including him giving 1 damage per frame to kill, wether or not it's wrong would require a crt to change/fix rather than a vs match tho, the way you said it makes it sound simple enough to be a quick crt
 
isn't it his starting move tho?


Well, we acceted that all damage related stuff Sans does to be dura neg via karm, including him giving 1 damage per frame to kill, wether or not it's wrong would require a crt to change/fix rather than a vs match tho, the way you said it makes it sound simple enough to be a quick crt
Here is what the profile says about karma
Powers and Abilities section:
“Sans is able to inflict KARMA with each attack, a type of poison effect which whittles the opponents HP down overtime.”
Notable attacks section:
“Whatever is struck by one of Sans's attacks will suffer from this condition, for a brief period. It essentially functions as poison damage for one's SOUL. KARMA cannot exceed 40 and also cannot cause the protagonist's HP to fall below one, with the more KARMA damage is built up, the faster it drains.”

Nothing on his profile says he does one damage no matter what. If I am wrong please quote the part that says so.
 
Here is what the profile says about karma
Powers and Abilities section:
“Sans is able to inflict KARMA with each attack, a type of poison effect which whittles the opponents HP down overtime.”
Notable attacks section:
“Whatever is struck by one of Sans's attacks will suffer from this condition, for a brief period. It essentially functions as poison damage for one's SOUL. KARMA cannot exceed 40 and also cannot cause the protagonist's HP to fall below one, with the more KARMA damage is built up, the faster it drains.”

Nothing on his profile says he does one damage no matter what. If I am wrong please quote the part that says so.
it is simply outdated and no one changed that in the thread about the durability negation stuff, i already requested to add that detail in sans' profile
 
First you can't use stuff not on the profile.
and yet you used the argument for the "chip damage" even tho that isn't in the profile
besides, not being on the profile really doesn't mean that it isn't an accepted thing, it just need a note clarifying it so that we can avoid confusion of stuff like what happened in this thread
Second based on what evidence and where.
i already talked about the thread for the durability negation for undertale and about how that specified that it wouldn't affect Sans' since his ignores your defense stat straight up, before you say anything, that was the words of the OP of that thread, not me, so there isn't much to discuss here
 
The KARMA explanation on his page should absolutely not be changed, it explains exactly how KARMA functions in the game. Frisk also only takes 1 damage from Sans because he's the weakest Monster, 1HP is the minimum damage the player can take in Undertale, not because Sans deals set damage no matter what.

Chip damage is also mentioned on the profile.
While these attacks hardly seem to so any damage initially, the damage quickly racks up from remaining in contact with them, allowing this relatively weak opponent a way of bypassing the defenses of superior foes.
 
Back
Top