• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

LeoEpicGamer8910 said:
vsbattles.com

Leo's Ultimate FC/OC Multi-Tier Duos Tourney [Completed]

Making another meme at night cause i’m bored
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

This guy is kinda just consistently being a jerk and has been openly antagonizing people participating in the tourney for a bit now. I think this is against the site rules.
Click to expand...
I think i should add this has also been occuring in the final round of this tourney, and SSB has still been slandering nearly everyone despite me recommending him to just take a break from the forum to cool off. I won't explain exactly what's going on since that'd take a while, but i hope this can be resolved 👀
 
LeoEpicGamer8910 said:
vsbattles.com

Leo's Ultimate FC/OC Multi-Tier Duos Tourney [Completed]

Making another meme at night cause i’m bored
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

This guy is kinda just consistently being a jerk and has been openly antagonizing people participating in the tourney for a bit now. I think this is against the site rules.
Click to expand...
I left a comment here, if it persists feel free to mention it.
Dark_Soul20189 said:
Reporting @Tdjwo for commenting in a Staff thread without admin permission... It becomes so much worse since the comment included, trying to manipulate people into reporting @Wankbreaker ... It is clear as day He is still going after Wankbreaker, even after what happened, in the last report. And to make things even better, he is still doing the thing he complained about...
Click to expand...
If a discussion rule is being broken, then it should be mentioned — that being said, I don't know anything about Nasu, so I can’t say if there actually was a discussion rule being broken, but believing that there may have been one and vocalizing it isn’t report-worthy in of itself. Now the manner in which they did so (blurting it out in a staff thread published by a user that they have history with, as opposed to mentioning it to a staff member on their wall) is obviously not acceptable, and they seem to acknowledge that.

Regarding the guy’s history with wankbreaker. Could it be that they are targeting them once more? Potentially — there is a genuine possibility that they are trying to undermine them and mask it as believing that a discussion rule being broken, however, I, personally, can’t conclusively say that and for that reason I don’t support any punishment.
 
Catzlaflame said:
I left a comment here, if it persists feel free to mention it.

If a discussion rule is being broken, then it should be mentioned — that being said, I don't know anything about Nasu, so I can’t say if there actually was a discussion rule being broken, but believing that there may have been one and vocalizing it isn’t report-worthy in of itself. Now the manner in which they did so (blurting it out in a staff thread published by a user that they have history with, as opposed to mentioning it to a staff member on their wall) is obviously not acceptable, and they seem to acknowledge that.

Regarding the guy’s history with wankbreaker. Could it be that they are targeting them once more? Potentially — there is a genuine possibility that they are trying to undermine them and mask it as believing that a discussion rule being broken, however, I, personally, can’t conclusively say that and for that reason I don’t support any punishment.
Click to expand...
I already made my points here
Tdjwo said:
I didn't know it was a staff thread tbh as there were other non staff comments there but ofc @Dark_Soul20189 weirdly loves me so much he stalks my entire activity to only point me out once again.

And I don't understand where you got "manipulation" from considering all I said was that the thread he made was already a rule violation since there's already a discussion ban about it (a fact pretty much everyone seems to agree with in the thread).
Click to expand...
 
Catzlaflame said:
If a discussion rule is being broken, then it should be mentioned — that being said, I don't know anything about Nasu, so I can’t say if there actually was a discussion rule being broken, but believing that there may have been one and vocalizing it isn’t report-worthy in of itself. Now the manner in which they did so (blurting it out in a staff thread published by a user that they have history with, as opposed to mentioning it to a staff member on their wall) is obviously not acceptable, and they seem to acknowledge that.

Regarding the guy’s history with wankbreaker. Could it be that they are targeting them once more? Potentially — there is a genuine possibility that they are trying to undermine them and mask it as believing that a discussion rule being broken, however, I, personally, can’t conclusively say that and for that reason I don’t support any punishment.
Click to expand...
Pretty much the reason why I thought it was necessary to report since There is a history between the users and the attitude, that is repeatedly shown.
By the way, I forgot to link a comment regarding the report here.

This should be noted because it is the same problem that caused his last report here, here, and here (Couldn't find the report where he was reported for calling out Wank Breaker as a "biased translation"). Or is at least very much connected to it.

To make things worse, just some of the comments he has made, that is related to @Wankbreaker include. 1, 2 and 3. While they are nothing report worthy by themself, they speak volumes about the situation... Just read from here again, and see his arguments and mentality haven't changed.

It is clear at least some actions need to be taken.
 
Dark_Soul20189 said:
Pretty much the reason why I thought it was necessary to report since There is a history between the users and the attitude, that is repeatedly shown.
By the way, I forgot to link a comment regarding the report here.
Click to expand...
What's the point in linking a comment that catz most likely saw already? And Propelius didn't even address anything. Just jumped into conclusion without seeing any explanation. Why didn't you also post one of the possible reason I could have commented on the thread huh?
Dark_Soul20189 said:
This should be noted because it is the same problem that caused his last report here,
Click to expand...
Fun fact, in case you can't read or understand, I wasn't in the wrong at all for this report. Wanker did indeed break the rule by not asking for perms which I pointed out. But the only reason I was at fault was because I didn't report it in the RvR which honestly shouldn't have been a big deal considering I tagged a staff member to stop Wanker from what he was doing. But that's besides the point.
Dark_Soul20189 said:
here, and here (Couldn't find the report where he was reported for calling out Wank Breaker as a "biased translation"). Or is at least very much connected to it.
Click to expand...
Once again, Wanker did indeed use wrong translations with biased intentions since he's a translator but somehow can't make correct translations when it comes to Nasuverse. And just like before, I only didn't report in the RvR which is why I was blamed instead.
Dark_Soul20189 said:
To make things worse, just some of the comments he has made, that is related to @Wankbreaker include. 1, 2 and 3. While they are nothing report worthy by themself, they speak volumes about the situation... Just read from here again, and see his arguments and mentality haven't changed.

It is clear at least some actions need to be taken.
Click to expand...
For someone who isn't a staff member yet obsessed with me, lurking through every comment I make, maybe if you actually tried judging with an open mind and open eyes, then you'll see that all the reports made against me never put me in the wrong because I maliciously attacked Wanker. Rather, I was indeed right with my accusations (biased translation, clogging up thread without perms, etc). The only reason I still was kept at fault was because I didn't report to RvR first.

Also, you gotta stop stalking my activity. I know Wanker is your friend on discord or whatever but literally following all my comments/posts when you're not even a staff is just mad weird. Hope you have better things to do with your time. It didn't even take you more than 15 mins to reply to Catz which is just funny considering the time it should take you searching up all our possible quarrels and linking them lol
 
Last edited:
No back and forth in the RVR. We are in the evaluation phase — let interested staff comment.

Could you please clarify your stance @LephyrTheRevanchist

Dark_Soul20189 said:
To make things worse, just some of the comments he has made, that is related to @Wankbreaker include. 1, 2 and 3. While they are nothing report worthy by themself, they speak volumes about the situation... Just read from here again, and see his arguments and mentality haven't changed.
Click to expand...
Yes, I am aware of this. Their behavior was unacceptable, and because of that, this user was rightfully banned. I 100% support the ban they were given.

After said ban was finished, they are now saying the thread shouldn’t continue because, according to them, Wankbreaker is breaking a discussion rule. Again, I don’t know if there actually is a discussion rule being broken or not, but believing someone has, is something they are allowed to do — it isn’t fundamentally ill-intentioned in my view.

Honestly this latest comment they’ve made seems more concerning than the discussion rule comment if I’m being honest — but I’ll wait to hear from other staff.
 
Catzlaflame said:
No back and forth in the RVR. We are in the evaluation phase — let interested staff comment.

Could you please clarify your stance @LephyrTheRevanchist
Click to expand...
Exactly the same as yours here
Catzlaflame said:
Regarding the guy’s history with wankbreaker. Could it be that they are targeting them once more? Potentially — there is a genuine possibility that they are trying to undermine them and mask it as believing that a discussion rule being broken, however, I, personally, can’t conclusively say that and for that reason I don’t support any punishment.
Click to expand...
 
Idk if this is enought for a report but anyway, @Dog3352 keeps arguing out of ignorance in this thread (not only him but he is the most active). Anyway his comments will just clog the thread, i don't want something like this to happen (edit: here and here most of the messages are out of ignorance). Also, based on what he sayd we can easly deduce that he didn't even try to understand how things work in verse.
 
Last edited:
Berga14 said:
Anyway his comments will just clog the thread
Click to expand...
He made at most 4-5 comments, 1 of which was a refutation to the OP and then subsequent replies to people who responded to him - that isn't really clogging the thread, its just discussion. If they were completely pointless comments (i.e., just commenting "lol" / "lmfao", then that'd be fair, but his comments seem to be on-topic and relevant. If you can prove that his comments are out of ignorance and not out of disagreeing with the OP then that's another matter entirely, but otherwise, this doesn't break any rules in my view.
 
Catzlaflame said:
If you can prove that his comments are out of ignorance
Click to expand...
I can, the things he is saying are WRONG plot wise, he doesn't know what a soul or a core is, he doesn't know how skills work, he doesn't know anything verse wise. Still he keeps yapping. Just watch his last comment, complete nosense.
Edit: i can even explain why those things are nosense but idk if i can start yapping here
 
Berga14 said:
I can, the things he is saying are WRONG plot wise, he doesn't know what a soul or a core is, he doesn't know how skills work, he doesn't know anything verse wise. Still he keeps yapping. Just watch his last comment, complete nosense.
Edit: i can even explain why those things are nosense but idk if i can start yapping here
Click to expand...
I should have worded that better; I am asking you to show that he is acting intentionally ignorant -- This is what would be report-worthy. Someone not knowing a series, and commenting on a thread about it is not a rule violation. Assuming what you're saying is true, and he is actually completely wrong (idk because Idk the verse), if he does genuinely believe in the things he is saying, then he has the right to express that. It becomes a problem if he doesn't actually believe the things he is saying, but is pretending to do so to disagree with the thread.
 
Catzlaflame said:
if he does genuinely believe in the things he is saying, then he has the right to express that. It becomes a problem if he doesn't actually believe the things he is saying, but is pretending to do so to disagree with the thread.
Click to expand...
Well both Code CCL and Astral sayd to him to at least learn what a soul is in Tensura, which is a thing that he can learn in 2 minutes from researching on this wiki or from the external fandom wiki and he know about that wiki as he used scan from it. So he at least isn't even trying.
 
GarrixianXD said:
The issue would rather lie on you, because you didn't explain that particular in-verse thing.
Click to expand...
Dude, if you go to a crt of a verse you don't know you don't start yapping random things.
Also he is using scans from the LN and wiki of that verse. BUT apparently he doesn't know and doesn't try to know the most essential things to even try to understand the OP even thought they were explained and even thought he knew where to find those information. So he knows about the LN, he knows about the wiki BUT he ignores the explanation in the crt and doesn't search the answer for himself.
In the second link i sent there are like 4 pages of him yapping WRONG things even thought he kept getting answered and explanations.
 
Planck69 said:
Him having a specific understanding of a verse concept that doesn't mesh with the OP
Click to expand...
He doesn't understand how the most basic thing discussed in the OP works, so his comments are quite useless by defoult.
Planck69 said:
or not having the full picture)
Click to expand...
He got answers. He used LN and WIKi scans, so he perfectly knows where to find those information or maybe he already knows those info and he is just ignoring them.
He also got explanations in the answers in the crt.
Funny how this isn't the first time that this happens and funny how he was one of the dudes that were routing for High Godly downgrade...
 
Berga14 said:
He doesn't understand how the most basic thing discussed in the OP works, so his comments are quite useless by defoult.

He got answers. He used LN and WIKi scans, so he perfectly knows where to find those information or maybe he already knows those info and he is just ignoring them.
He also got explanations in the answers in the crt.
Funny how this isn't the first time that this happens and funny how he was one of the dudes that were routing for High Godly downgrade...
Click to expand...
OK but none of these are rule breaking. He's even apparently using scans and verse information to argue his points. Can it be frustrating? Yes. Is it reportable? At least so far, no.
 
Planck69 said:
He's even apparently using scans and verse information to argue his points.
Click to expand...
That isn't a point in his favour when he leaves out the most essential things to even start debating in that kind of thread. He used the wiki, so he knows how to type "astral body" in it and still he decided to take the most useless scans, change the context and comment. If only he spent 5 minutes of his life to do researches then all that useless debete wouldn't have happened. But i guess that for you is okay to debat about what a soul can do without knowing what a soul is.
Planck69 said:
Can it be frustrating? Yes. Is it reportable? At least so far, no.
Click to expand...
But i didnn't report him thought?
"Idk if this is enought for a report but anyway"
I just wanted to point out that that guy way of debating will lead (or his aimed) to clog the thread.
If people can write here about 1 message with the words "i disagree" then i can do the same with this metter.

Edit: also his comments aren't questions but claims.
 
Catzlaflame said:
I am asking you to show that he is acting intentionally ignorant
Click to expand...
Could the following be enough for that?
  1. He's sticking to the manga even though the LN takes priority over the manga due to Manga having clear visual limitations as well as less details compared to the LN, which I have pointed out earlier but he refuses to accept that.
  2. He refuses to read the physiology pages, which are made for others to understand how the verse works, and instead goes on to make his own baseless assumptions off a few words, which he doesn't even know the meaning of how those words work or how special they are in-verse.
  3. Argument from ignorance, I broke the conclusions down into steps and he still refuses to believe them [still claiming "it is less lethal"] when I clearly gave the scans that the power's lethality is not reduced earlier.
  4. He's basing his arguments on "probably" assumptions and refuses to believe otherwise even tho I have made it clear, multiple times.
 
Astral_Trinity439 said:
He's sticking to the manga even though the LN takes priority over the manga due to Manga having clear visual limitations as well as less details compared to the LN, which I have pointed out earlier but he refuses to accept that.
Click to expand...
These are not visual limitations, it just doesn't have all the details that it has in the LN (monologue for example), I'm using the manga just for mere image illustration, to visually show how it happened, since there is no contradiction between the manga and the LN (at least not in this part).
Astral_Trinity439 said:
He refuses to read the physiology pages, which are made for others to understand how the verse works, and instead goes on to make his own baseless assumptions off a few words, which he doesn't even know the meaning of how those words work or how special they are in-verse.
Click to expand...
I never refused to read the page, I literally read it 3 times, and even said "even if you are right that "heart" refers to the core" in your response to that comment, I admitted that you are right.
Astral_Trinity439 said:
Argument from ignorance, I broke the conclusions down into steps and he still refuses to believe them [still claiming "it is less lethal"] when I clearly gave the scans that the power's lethality is not reduced earlier.
Click to expand...
It wasn't even at that point that I argued against your aegument, and I never claimed that the blow would be less lethal because it was weaker, but less fatal because Hinata would even try to leave parts of Rimuru's body "alive" to make sure he would not die, and because Hinata makes it clear several times that even though she used that move, she was trying hard not to kill Rimuru with it (not making him weaker, but preventing him from completely destroying Rimuru), so I'm not denying what you said.
Astral_Trinity439 said:
He's basing his arguments on "probably" assumptions and refuses to believe otherwise even tho I have made it clear, multiple times.
Click to expand...
A portion of their rebuttals also have no supporting evidence, particularly talking about the "sacrifice" thing.
 
Last edited:
Dog3352 said:
These are not visual limitations, it just doesn't have all the details that it has in the LN (monologue for example), I'm using the manga as supporting evidence, since the manga's images don't contradict the LN at any point.
Click to expand...
I didn't say Manga contradicts the LN, I said you using manga as the base of your argument instead of the LN is the problem.
Dog3352 said:
I never refused to read the page, I literally read it 3 times, and even said "even if you are right that "heart" refers to the core" in your response to that comment, I admitted that you are right.
Click to expand...
At the end, that is, prior to that point and throughout our conversation of around 10+ posts, that argument has repeated multiple times.
Dog3352 said:
It wasn't even at that point that I argued against your aegument, and I never claimed that the blow would be less lethal because it was weaker,
Click to expand...
Neither did I
Dog3352 said:
but less fatal because Hinata would even try to leave parts of Rimuru's body "alive" to make sure he would not die, and because Hinata makes it clear several times that even though
Click to expand...
Which, as I said multiple times, would not reduce the lethality just because "she tried to".
Dog3352 said:
she used that move, she was trying hard not to kill Rimuru with it (not making him weaker, but preventing him from completely destroying Rimuru), so I'm not denying what you said.
Click to expand...
Rimuru's "Probably" assumption that Hinata wanted that.
Dog3352 said:
A portion of their rebuttals also have no supporting evidence, particularly talking about the "sacrifice" thing.
Click to expand...
Except, not really, the term "sacrifice" is self-explanatory, and your whole misunderstanding of "it must be present in his arm, not just his heart core" has no proof other then a single visual panel when the entire novel's narrative suggests otherwise, and so does the skills and magic page.

In any case, I'll be leaving this for staff to judge and won't be replying further unless its a staff asking me something.
 
Astral_Trinity439 said:
I didn't say Manga contradicts the LN, I said you using manga as the base of your argument instead of the LN is the problem.
Click to expand...
I'm just using it for visual illustration, the manga isn't my main argument, and if it doesn't contradict itself or anything like that, I don't see the problem with that.
Astral_Trinity439 said:
At the end, that is, prior to that point and throughout our conversation of around 10+ posts, that argument has repeated multiple times.
Click to expand...
Definitely not, I just talked about the argument from the heart 2 times, and stopped right after your second answer.
Astral_Trinity439 said:
Neither did I
Click to expand...
Astral_Trinity439 said:
Which, as I said multiple times, would not reduce the lethality just because "she tried to".
Click to expand...
How does not completely destroying Rimuru no reduce the lethality of the cut?
Astral_Trinity439 said:
Rimuru's "Probably" assumption that Hinata wanted that.
Click to expand...
I mean, the assumption fits with the fact that Hinata declared several times that she would try not to kill Rimuru with that attack, and I don't see any other reason for her to specifically aim lower on the body.
Astral_Trinity439 said:
Except, not really, the term "sacrifice" is self-explanatory, and your whole misunderstanding of "it must be present in his arm, not just his heart core" has no proof other then a single visual panel when the entire novel's narrative suggests otherwise, and so does the skills and magic page.
Click to expand...
Rimuru literally sacrificing his skill at that moment completely contradicts the skill itself still remaining only in the core, the sacrifice itself wouldn't exist and wouldn't make any sense if that were the case, and I'm not even using the manga panel as the main argument, but what the LN demonstrates to mean by this "sacrifice".
 
Last edited:
DarkDragonMedeus said:
I have my hands full, thus haven't got feedback on Dog3352's report, but there has been a recent report that @Shiedaisthepeak has posted nonsense/gibberish on someone else's wall. And there's apparently harassment on tiktok or so.
Click to expand...
I don't mean to be misunderstood, but calling this 'nonsense' feels like an insult to my language. Additionally, if you translate what I’ve said, you’ll see it’s actually a line from a TV series (Akasya Durağı). Wishing you good work!
 
Shiedaisthepeak said:
I don't mean to be misunderstood, but calling this 'nonsense' feels like an insult to my language. Additionally, if you translate what I’ve said, you’ll see it’s actually a line from a TV series (Akasya Durağı). Wishing you good work!
Click to expand...
My apologies, it seems Google Translate just wasn't working for me. Perhaps some words were misspelled was why it couldn't detect, though parts of it started to work when I double checked and tried again.
LephyrTheRevanchist said:
I was considering giving 'em a warning in the thread, but after checking the warning tracker, considered a formal report might be better.

Reporting user @Tempestdragon6 for this comment

They had been warned very recently for disruptive behavior, also on a TenSura thread, which resulted in a week-long ban.
Click to expand...
Yeah, this is bad. I suggest a ban for another month or two if he is still misbehaving after a week long ban.
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
Yeah, this is bad. I suggest a ban for another month or two if he is still misbehaving after a week long ban.
Click to expand...
I think that a warning should be sufficient. Speaking as an autistic person, I do not think that the comment was intended in a hateful and ableist manner, just in a "that's gay"-style language habit. 🙏
 
Vzearr said:
Worthless is continuously antagonistic in posts regarding things he disagrees with, similar to Tjdwo, but worse. I support either a strict final warning, or a straight up ban, this dude shows no signs of changing, he's been like this since I could first remember encountering him on the site.
Click to expand...
What happened to this?

I believe the report of Worthless' behavior never came to anything.
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
My apologies, it seems Google Translate just wasn't working for me. Perhaps some words were misspelled was why it couldn't detect, though parts of it started to work when I double checked and tried again.
Click to expand...
I put the first sentence into google translate.
kız floxia amını yiyim mi
Click to expand...
And the result was:
Girl Floxia, should I eat your pus*y?
Click to expand...

Since electronic translations can be weird, there is a quora post inquiring about the meaning of the notable word above — Actual Turkish people also corroborate the translation from google, describing the word as extremely profane:


Even if that’s is from a show, that’s still an extremely weird thing to say. Not to mention that when the user said, “Foxia” in that message:
Girl Floxia, should I eat your pus*y?
Click to expand...

That isn’t a foreign word…. it’s the vs battles name of the other user… so that part is clearly not from a tv show.

Do explain yourself @Shiedaisthepeak
 
Shiedaisthepeak said:
Additionally, if you translate what I’ve said, you’ll see it’s actually a line from a TV series (Akasya Durağı).
Click to expand...
For the record, this is a lie. There is no such line in the TV series in question.
Catzlaflame said:
I put the first sentence into google translate.

And the result was:


Since electronic translations can be weird, there is a quora post inquiring about the meaning of the notable word above — Actual Turkish people also corroborate the translation from google, describing the word as extremely profane:


Even if that’s is from a show, that’s still an extremely weird thing to say. Not to mention that when the user said, “Foxia” in that message:


That isn’t a foreign word…. it’s the vs battles name of the other user… so that part is clearly not from a tv show.

Do explain yourself @Shiedaisthepeak
Click to expand...
Yes, your translation is completely correct. This is a disturbing comment.
 
So for how long should we ban Shiedaisthepeak? For a year, or longer or briefer? 🙏
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
32 33 34
Replies
1K
Views
99K
Elizhaa
Elizhaa
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
5K
Agnaa
Agnaa
  • Locked
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
21
Views
2K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
531
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top