- 5,163
- 11,793
Simply because someone doesn't know about a concept from a specific verse isn't even remotely considered irrational bias. The issue would rather lie on you, because you didn't explain that particular in-verse thing.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 833
- 630
Dude, if you go to a crt of a verse you don't know you don't start yapping random things.
Also he is using scans from the LN and wiki of that verse. BUT apparently he doesn't know and doesn't try to know the most essential things to even try to understand the OP even thought they were explained and even thought he knew where to find those information. So he knows about the LN, he knows about the wiki BUT he ignores the explanation in the crt and doesn't search the answer for himself.
In the second link i sent there are like 4 pages of him yapping WRONG things even thought he kept getting answered and explanations.
- 833
- 630
He doesn't understand how the most basic thing discussed in the OP works, so his comments are quite useless by defoult.
He got answers. He used LN and WIKi scans, so he perfectly knows where to find those information or maybe he already knows those info and he is just ignoring them.
He also got explanations in the answers in the crt.
- 20,418
- 22,597
OK but none of these are rule breaking. He's even apparently using scans and verse information to argue his points. Can it be frustrating? Yes. Is it reportable? At least so far, no.
- 833
- 630
That isn't a point in his favour when he leaves out the most essential things to even start debating in that kind of thread. He used the wiki, so he knows how to type "astral body" in it and still he decided to take the most useless scans, change the context and comment. If only he spent 5 minutes of his life to do researches then all that useless debete wouldn't have happened. But i guess that for you is okay to debat about what a soul can do without knowing what a soul is.
But i didnn't report him thought?
"Idk if this is enought for a report but anyway"
I just wanted to point out that that guy way of debating will lead (or his aimed) to clog the thread.
If people can write here about 1 message with the words "i disagree" then i can do the same with this metter.
Edit: also his comments aren't questions but claims.
Astral_Trinity439
He/Him- 4,624
- 7,117
Could the following be enough for that?
- He's sticking to the manga even though the LN takes priority over the manga due to Manga having clear visual limitations as well as less details compared to the LN, which I have pointed out earlier but he refuses to accept that.
- He refuses to read the physiology pages, which are made for others to understand how the verse works, and instead goes on to make his own baseless assumptions off a few words, which he doesn't even know the meaning of how those words work or how special they are in-verse.
- Argument from ignorance, I broke the conclusions down into steps and he still refuses to believe them [still claiming "it is less lethal"] when I clearly gave the scans that the power's lethality is not reduced earlier.
- He's basing his arguments on "probably" assumptions and refuses to believe otherwise even tho I have made it clear, multiple times.
- 1,868
- 1,394
These are not visual limitations, it just doesn't have all the details that it has in the LN (monologue for example), I'm using the manga just for mere image illustration, to visually show how it happened, since there is no contradiction between the manga and the LN (at least not in this part).
I never refused to read the page, I literally read it 3 times, and even said "even if you are right that "heart" refers to the core" in your response to that comment, I admitted that you are right.
It wasn't even at that point that I argued against your aegument, and I never claimed that the blow would be less lethal because it was weaker, but less fatal because Hinata would even try to leave parts of Rimuru's body "alive" to make sure he would not die, and because Hinata makes it clear several times that even though she used that move, she was trying hard not to kill Rimuru with it (not making him weaker, but preventing him from completely destroying Rimuru), so I'm not denying what you said.
A portion of their rebuttals also have no supporting evidence, particularly talking about the "sacrifice" thing.
Last edited:
Astral_Trinity439
He/Him- 4,624
- 7,117
I didn't say Manga contradicts the LN, I said you using manga as the base of your argument instead of the LN is the problem.
At the end, that is, prior to that point and throughout our conversation of around 10+ posts, that argument has repeated multiple times.
Neither did I
Which, as I said multiple times, would not reduce the lethality just because "she tried to".
Rimuru's "Probably" assumption that Hinata wanted that.
Except, not really, the term "sacrifice" is self-explanatory, and your whole misunderstanding of "it must be present in his arm, not just his heart core" has no proof other then a single visual panel when the entire novel's narrative suggests otherwise, and so does the skills and magic page.
In any case, I'll be leaving this for staff to judge and won't be replying further unless its a staff asking me something.
- 1,868
- 1,394
I'm just using it for visual illustration, the manga isn't my main argument, and if it doesn't contradict itself or anything like that, I don't see the problem with that.
Definitely not, I just talked about the argument from the heart 2 times, and stopped right after your second answer.
How does not completely destroying Rimuru no reduce the lethality of the cut?
I mean, the assumption fits with the fact that Hinata declared several times that she would try not to kill Rimuru with that attack, and I don't see any other reason for her to specifically aim lower on the body.
Rimuru literally sacrificing his skill at that moment completely contradicts the skill itself still remaining only in the core, the sacrifice itself wouldn't exist and wouldn't make any sense if that were the case, and I'm not even using the manga panel as the main argument, but what the LN demonstrates to mean by this "sacrifice".
Last edited:
- 34,768
- 42,243
I have my hands full, thus haven't got feedback on Dog3352's report, but there has been a recent report that @Shiedaisthepeak has posted nonsense/gibberish on someone else's wall. And there's apparently harassment on tiktok or so, but haven't seen evidence of that.
- 492
- 174
I don't mean to be misunderstood, but calling this 'nonsense' feels like an insult to my language. Additionally, if you translate what I’ve said, you’ll see it’s actually a line from a TV series (Akasya Durağı). Wishing you good work!
- 12,494
- 16,896
I was considering giving 'em a warning in the thread, but after checking the warning tracker, considered a formal report might be better.
Reporting user @Tempestdragon6 for this comment
They had been warned very recently for disruptive behavior, also on a TenSura thread, which resulted in a week-long ban.
Reporting user @Tempestdragon6 for this comment
They had been warned very recently for disruptive behavior, also on a TenSura thread, which resulted in a week-long ban.
- 34,768
- 42,243
My apologies, it seems Google Translate just wasn't working for me. Perhaps some words were misspelled was why it couldn't detect, though parts of it started to work when I double checked and tried again.
Yeah, this is bad. I suggest a ban for another month or two if he is still misbehaving after a week long ban.
- 492
- 174
No problem! If you'd like to take a closer look at the quote, here you go.
And I have a request for you. Could you take a look at the CRT I sent you?
- 178,196
- 91,335
- Thread starter
- #28,617
I think that a warning should be sufficient. Speaking as an autistic person, I do not think that the comment was intended in a hateful and ableist manner, just in a "that's gay"-style language habit.
- 378
- 153
What happened to this?
I believe the report of Worthless' behavior never came to anything.
- 12,494
- 16,896
While I appreciate you not wanting to escalate things, I will still note this response as inappropriate.
Overall, I do agree with Ant that a warning suffices. Still, wanted to bring it to attention.
- 2,060
- 3,920
I put the first sentence into google translate.
And the result was:
Since electronic translations can be weird, there is a quora post inquiring about the meaning of the notable word above — Actual Turkish people also corroborate the translation from google, describing the word as extremely profane:
Even if that’s is from a show, that’s still an extremely weird thing to say. Not to mention that when the user said, “Foxia” in that message:
That isn’t a foreign word…. it’s the vs battles name of the other user… so that part is clearly not from a tv show.
Do explain yourself @Shiedaisthepeak
- 12,494
- 16,896
Regarding the @Dog3352 report, I agree with these sentiments.
CodeCCLL
He/Him- 3,338
- 2,259
For the record, this is a lie. There is no such line in the TV series in question.
Yes, your translation is completely correct. This is a disturbing comment.
- 492
- 174
Just let me explain myself Please, there is an important cosmology revision, and I will explain it.So for how long should we ban Shiedaisthepeak? For a year, or longer or briefer?
- 5,163
- 11,793
You're given a chance to explain yourself. Don't waste it.
- 12,494
- 16,896
For comparison sake:So for how long should we ban Shiedaisthepeak? For a year, or longer or briefer?
Twisted_Little_Raven received a ban of two weeks for an inappropriate conversation with a meme of an innuendo (the image has since expired)
While it should also be noted Raven had prior warnings about inappropriate comments, the comment made by @Shiedaisthepeak is frankly worse than what she got banned for, specially since they tried hiding behind another language; the fact they also wrote it apparently unsolicited; and tried to explain it away with a lie (though I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt there by simple courtesy). So 1 month (as originally proposed for Raven in her report) would be the minimum for me as things stand.
I will nevertheless wait for @Shiedaisthepeak explanation before giving my final thoughts.
- 492
- 174
I have come to fully explain something you misunderstood and harshly judged me for.
FIRST JUDGMENT: 'This is not from a series.'
It’s natural for you to make this comment without reviewing the link I provided, but please allow me to explain. If you search for this quote online along with the series I mentioned, you will find the connection I referred to. Additionally, if you look at both of our profiles, you’ll realize this is meant as a 'joke.' Please also review my CRTs and profiles — you won’t find even the slightest insult or disrespect. This is an inside joke between friends. (The situation I need to add is that the person referred to as Floxia currently hates me, and I can provide evidence of the insults they've said behind my back. I want to clarify that this person is neither a witness nor a friend of mine in any way. This is an issue from the past.)
Of course, I don’t deny this judgment, but I will keep the explanation brief. What I did was a reference to the character the person is a fan of, which is part of a local humor style. You can see this in the 'TikTok link' I shared, and you can also find it if you search for it in Turkish.
CONCLUSION:
This is merely a joke made with 'one' person. Otherwise, you can understand this from the comment by Floxia on my profile saying, 'I’m waiting for you on Discord.' Here, I list all my CRTs and request that my actions be reviewed. I find it absurd and illogical for my account to be removed over just a joke. Thank you in advance for reading.
CRT 1
CRT 2
CRT 3
CRT 4
I will call upon @Mr. Bambu , who has consistently commented on my CRTs (thank you for his comments so far), as a witness of course, only if he agrees. I want to clarify that I am not taking him as an assistant, as I don’t want to be misunderstood; he is someone I deeply respect. I believe he is familiar with my communication with him as well as my attitude toward people and in CRTs. Therefore, I specifically request his opinion.
-
I would like to state that I am not hiding behind any language. After you listen to my (its just a simple meme) explanation, I will ask for your comment. Therefore, I thank you in advance.
-
I would like to correct myself this is a joke taken from an old television show. It’s personally disappointing that you would place me so easily in the “liar” category without even searching the TikTok link I shared or looking it up online. However, I don’t view you negatively, as misunderstandings or situations may have been overlooked
-
AND I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ADD:
The individual named Floxia explicitly threatened to have me banned. Despite my stating that the matter was resolved and the joke had ended, they used a phrase like, "Let me tell Antvasima to get you banned." It is clear that this was a joke, yet I am now facing a situation where the other party has approached me with hostility and bullied me on TikTok after commenting on my profile.
here
here
Last edited by a moderator:
- 12,494
- 16,896
From our site rules. It being a joke could lessen the severity here, but as noted, we have indeed banned others for comparatively tamer "humor".
I ask for a bit of clarification here: Are you friends or "enemies"? You seem to imply you two have/had beef, but are also acting quite casually with them (enough to make an "inside joke")
I can see it as being an actual joke. The problem overall is that it goes quite overboard for our rules.
That being said, the added context does sway me a little that you were simply clueless about the severity of how the site takes that type of joke and could support a stern warning and leave it at that. I will wait for further staff comments.
- 12,494
- 16,896
In the future: do not joke with someone who you don't have a good relationship with.
- 492
- 174
I did my best to explain the situation and supported it with my explanations. I don’t want it to appear like drama, and yes, I wasn’t aware of these rules, at least not for a joke. Once again, I apologize what I did was a serious mistake. Thank you for your understanding.
-
Yes, the results are not very "encouraging."
-
We used to be friends, but in the current situation, if you look at the Imgur links I’ve shared, you’ll see that they are now threatening to have me banned.
Last edited by a moderator:
- 178,196
- 91,335
- Thread starter
- #28,631
- 12,494
- 16,896
Try not to multipost. If you have more to add, edit your last comment.
- 492
- 174
Sorry my bad
- 27
- 9
So yes, im friend with Shieda (not close), they used to be friends but after time Floxia threaten him.
CodeCCLL
He/Him- 3,338
- 2,259
Aren't you aware that the link you gave goes to a random video that has nothing to do with the TV series you mentioned?
Also, all the episodes of the series you mentioned have already been to YouTube, so you can give us a video and timestamp of where exactly the "joke" you mentioned was said. There are many people in this forum who can translate from turkish to english, it is quite easy to determine whether you is telling the truth or not.
- 492
- 174
I think this might come across as evasive, but it's a joke from a show, as I would say for the series. I’ve clarified this again in the TikTok link I shared I was simply repeating the joke.
Here is what I’m sharing. If you're going to approach me with accusations of lying, feel free, but this will be implied as defamation. What you're implying is that “he’s lying to cover up his actions.” If that’s what you intend, then go ahead,Still, I want to emphasize that this doesn’t mean I look down on you, nor could it ever mean that. I don’t harbor any hatred toward you, and once again, thank you for your comment.
ADDITION:
If you ask Turkish citizens in the forum, I believe they will naturally confirm what I’ve said. Therefore, you can have Turkish people you know investigate and look into this matter.
- 492
- 174
I think this might come across as evasive, but it's a joke from a show, as I would say for the series. I’ve clarified this again in the TikTok link I shared I was simply repeating the joke.
Go ahead, ask whoever you want and do your research. However, if you’re going to approach me as someone who “lies to cover up their wrongdoing,” I don’t take that very well. So, my request is this: please don’t talk to me in that manner.
ADDİTİON:
I don’t believe I did this, but seriously, posting it as a screenshot would be pointless. Anyway, here’s the explanation regarding its connection to the show:
The joke was made based on this episode, and if you translate and look into it along with its meanings, you’ll see that this is the case. Additionally, you can ask the Turkish members on the forum, and they will confirm it as well.
I don’t want to interfere with your work, nor do I have the right to do so, but this time, you could issue a strict warning. This is just my personal opinion.So what should we currently do here?
Last edited by a moderator:
- 492
- 174
Where did you get the idea that I don’t know this person? (close) I can send more Imgur links to demonstrate my connection with them if needed.
+
If I hadn’t done this under the guise of a joke and had genuinely meant it, yes, it would have been no different from harassment. You’re right about that. However, my closeness with the person (in the past) was such that we were close enough for me to make this kind of joke and yes, it’s strange or unusual, but much of Turkish humor is based on swearing (often in a sexual sense). So, I’m not blaming you—thank you for sharing your perspective on the matter
Last edited:
CodeCCLL
He/Him- 3,338
- 2,259
In your first comment here, you said that what you said was a joke about a line from the TV series "Akasya Durağı", and I wanted you to prove it.
However now, you sent a video of a completely different TV series that has nothing to do with the series you mentioned in the beginning, and there is not a single line in the video you sent related to the disturbing comment you made.
I will not comment further at this point.
