• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Reporting @Tdjwo and @KingNanaya for stonewalling this thread for an entire page and an a half, even after being repeatedly told to stop by @IdiosyncraticLawyer and I.

vsbattles.com

Tier 0 Swirl of the Root Retake

This is a false mistranslation. Nowhere in the raw scans does it even remotely imply that the Counter Force takes the shape of the Akashic records. @Wankbreaker I might be missing something, since I only looked at part of it and aren't familiar with the verse at all, but this passes the sniff...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
 
Wankbreaker said:
Reporting @Tdjwo and @KingNanaya for stonewalling this thread for an entire page and an a half, even after being repeatedly told to stop by @IdiosyncraticLawyer and I.

vsbattles.com

Tier 0 Swirl of the Root Retake

This is a false mistranslation. Nowhere in the raw scans does it even remotely imply that the Counter Force takes the shape of the Akashic records. @Wankbreaker I might be missing something, since I only looked at part of it and aren't familiar with the verse at all, but this passes the sniff...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Click to expand...
I will be as honest as I can, Tdjwo is consistently causing trouble in threads he doesn't agree with, derailing them, providing no insight into why he disagrees, I first noticed it here, where he openly admitted to derailing! He is now seen to be consistently in the rvt where he shows similar behavior, so I'll say that I believe a ban is needed here, we can't just let him keep going on with this behaviour.

As for Nanaya, I support a warning, whether informal or formal.
 
Vzearr said:
I will be as honest as I can, Tdjwo is consistently causing trouble in threads he doesn't agree with, derailing them, providing no insight into why he disagrees, I first noticed it here, where he openly admitted to derailing! He is now seen to be consistently in the rvt where he shows similar behavior, so I'll say that I believe a ban is needed here, we can't just let him keep going on with this behaviour.

As for Nanaya, I support a warning, whether informal or formal.
Click to expand...
The thread you linked was indeed a derailing comment but that was intentional because it was a topic already discussed on multiple occasions already. In fact, almost everyone seemed to agree that the thread you made then was purely unnecessary at that time.

This particular case however, has nothing to do with me derailing. How is me reporting someone to an staff/admin a form of derail?
 
Wankbreaker said:
even after being repeatedly told to stop
Click to expand...
You mean like how you were told by @Deagonx to stop posting, and how you continued to do so over the course of 2 months? And when called out on this fact, you ignored the rules that stated that staff members can remove the permissions to comment, if they were given that permission by staff? Or how @IdiosyncraticLawyer threatened to get staff members to delete @Tdjwo comment that originally called this fact out? We called out your poor behavior. I can admit that on my side, I was being pretty antagonistic while doing so. I could have handled myself better.
Vzearr said:
As for Nanaya, I support a warning, whether informal or formal.
Click to expand...
I'd be fine with either one.
 
KingNanaya said:
You mean like how you were told by @Deagonx to stop posting, and how you continued to do so over the course of 2 months? And when called out on this fact, you ignored the rules that stated that staff members can remove the permissions to comment, if they were given that permission by staff?
Click to expand...
Bureaucrats can give indefinite permission to comment. You were told this quite a few times. Plus:

I do not think that we have strict set rules regarding this issue, but it does not exactly seem to be an image helper or translation helper area of input, unless they have something genuinely important to share. 🙏
Click to expand...

Image/Translation helpers can inherently comment on staff threads if deemed important. Tdjwo directly replied to some of my points. Trying to silence the opposition using underhanded methods is not a good idea. You don’t want to go that route.
KingNanaya said:
Or how @IdiosyncraticLawyer threatened to get staff members to delete @Tdjwo comment that originally called this fact out? We called out your poor behavior. I can admit that on my side, I was being pretty antagonistic while doing so. I could have handled myself better.
Click to expand...
Because you two were stonewalling the thread multiple times.
 
Tdjwo said:
Btw, this is my very first comment that i made that apparently "constitute" as a rule violation. And this is the same person that had been complained about by a thread moderator previously

Tell me how i'm at fault here.
Click to expand...
Did you get permission to even comment on the first place? Also, Wankbreaker got permission by Antvasima to make a few posts at that time so I'd rather be on the side that Deagon overlooked that.
 
Wankbreaker said:
Bureaucrats can give indefinite permission to comment.
Click to expand...
I'm aware. And I cited the rules to you.
If a staff member determines that a regular member has misused their granted privileges, another staff member can remove them.
Click to expand...
Wankbreaker said:
Image/Translation helpers can inherently comment on staff threads if deemed important.
Click to expand...
Conflicts with what I was previously aware of, which was this:
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/520049258913726483/1302048687710802081/image.png?ex=6726b2d6&is=67256156&hm=4ec4d0ecfc294e6f88f0615540a98a95d140e24a3968c3c1701d38535577b04b&
Wankbreaker said:
Because you two were stonewalling the thread multiple times.
Click to expand...
not what was happening at all.
Wankbreaker said:
Trying to silence the opposition using underhanded methods is not a good idea. You don’t want to go that route.
Click to expand...
You went that route.
 
GarrixianXD said:
Did you get permission to even comment on the first place? Also, Wankbreaker got permission by Antvasima to make a few posts at that time so I'd rather be on the side that Deagon overlooked that.
Click to expand...
He got permission to comment, as long as the comments were constructive. I would hardly call stonewalling for over a page constructive.

KingNanaya received no such permission,however (which is ironic, given the situation.)
 
GarrixianXD said:
Did you get permission to even comment on the first place? Also, Wankbreaker got permission by Antvasima to make a few posts at that time so I'd rather be on the side that Deagon overlooked that.
Click to expand...
Which one? If you're referring to my post to Deagon, then yes, I was given perms by Antvasima
 
KingNanaya said:
I'm aware. And I cited the rules to you.
Click to expand...
I don’t wanna swing my position around, but a TL helper is hardly a “regular member”, don’t you think?
KingNanaya said:
Conflicts with what I was previously aware of, which was this:
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/520049258913726483/1302048687710802081/image.png?ex=6726b2d6&is=67256156&hm=4ec4d0ecfc294e6f88f0615540a98a95d140e24a3968c3c1701d38535577b04b&

not what was happening at all.
Click to expand...
Lawyer told you to stop, and you repeated the same thing over and over.
KingNanaya said:
You went that route.
Click to expand...
In what scenario?
 
Tdjwo said:
This particular case however, has nothing to do with me derailing. How is me reporting someone to an staff/admin a form of derail?
Click to expand...
It's kind of ironic, you were talking about wankbreaker not having permission to post in that thread yet you were posting 10x more than him. You were told by idio to stop commenting countless times yet you kept going, you didn't have permission to comment in that thread yet you commented, countless times, derailing the thread further with each comment.
 
Translation Helpers do not, by default, have permission to post in staff-only threads.

Antvasima's permission to post did seem temporary, as he asked about which specific point was being made, and then said a few posts could be made about that. However, this wasn't the most obvious thing ever, so missing it was understandable.

An interested thread mod can overrule a disinterested bureaucrat's permission to post in a thread, imo. Here "interested" and "disinterested" refer to having direct involvement in the day-to-day posts of a thread.

From the start, Tdjwo and KingNanaya shouldn't have kept bickering about this in the thread. If you're reporting someone for violating a rule like that, I'm fine with gracing one or two posts about it, but after that you should wait for staff or go to the RVR.

I think Wankbreaker's permission to post there should be considered gone until another staff member provides it again. I think Tdjwo and Nanaya should get a light punishment, as they did repeatedly go against a staff member telling them to stop clogging up a staff only thread.

I'm gonna go clean up any superfluous posts from both of these threads.
 
Agnaa said:
Translation Helpers do not, by default, have permission to post in staff-only threads.
Click to expand...
While that is the case, Ant said that these members are free to comment if it is important, I quoted the exact message above.

(A direct response to someone tackling a few major counterpoints I personally made seems important, imo.) but I’ll leave it at that.
Agnaa said:
Antvasima's permission to post did seem temporary, as he asked about which specific point was being made, and then said a few posts could be made about that. However, this wasn't the most obvious thing ever, so missing it was understandable.
Click to expand...
This was on the first occasion I asked. I asked again after that, and there was no mention of a “few” posts.

Agnaa said:
An interested thread mod can overrule a disinterested bureaucrat's permission to post in a thread, imo. Here "interested" and "disinterested" refer to having direct involvement in the day-to-day posts of a thread.
Click to expand...
 
Wankbreaker said:
This was on the first occasion I asked. I asked again after that, and there was no mention of a “few” posts.
Click to expand...
Okay. I suppose that you can probably make some posts there then. 🙏
Click to expand...
Wankbreaker said:
A direct response to someone tackling a few major counterpoints I personally made
Click to expand...
No, it was to Deagon. Tdjwo started off saying:
The current proposition Deagonx defends
Click to expand...
He only responded to Deagon, Not you.

Post#78
 
No more back-and-forth on that point, please. Someone responding to you doesn't give you permission to post in a staff only thread, otherwise you could easily get nigh-indefinite permission with no real oversight.
 
Wankbreaker said:
While that is the case, Ant said that these members are free to comment if it is important, I quoted the exact message above.

(A direct response to someone tackling a few major counterpoints I personally made seems important, imo.) but I’ll leave it at that.
Click to expand...
Ant said he wasn't certain of the rules in that area, luckily I am.

Our pages for Content Moderators, Thread Moderators, Calculation Group, and the like, mention in their Benefits section how such users get permission to post in staff-only threads.

You'll notice that Image Helpers and Translation Helpers lack that.

I'd also point out from the wording of Ant's comment, and the context it was said in, that it was likely about RVR posts specifically despite you asking a more general question, as he says "it does not exactly seem to be an image helper or translation helper area of input", which is not true for certain staff only threads, but is always true for the RVR.
Wankbreaker said:
This was on the first occasion I asked. I asked again after that, and there was no mention of a “few” posts.
Click to expand...
Are you linking the wrong thing? Because that's exactly the instance I was talking about.

You ask for permission
Could I receive additional permission to comment on the root thread?
Click to expand...
Ant asks you which points you want to bring up
What do you wish to say there?
Click to expand...
You vaguely allude to them
Pretty much just bring up a couple of new arguments, and address a misconception the supporters have
Click to expand...
Ant says you can make some posts about them
Okay. I suppose that you can probably make some posts there then.
Click to expand...
 
Agnaa said:
Ant said he wasn't certain of the rules in that area, luckily I am.

Our pages for Content Moderators, Thread Moderators, Calculation Group, and the like, mention in their Benefits section how such users get permission to post in staff-only threads.

You'll notice that Image Helpers and Translation Helpers lack that.

I'd also point out from the wording of Ant's comment, and the context it was said in, that it was likely about RVR posts specifically despite you asking a more general question, as he says "it does not exactly seem to be an image helper or translation helper area of input", which is not true for certain staff only threads, but is always true for the RVR.
Click to expand...
Alright, I’ll leave it at that then.
Agnaa said:
Are you linking the wrong thing? Because that's exactly the instance I was talking about.

You ask for permission

Ant asks you which points you want to bring up

You vaguely allude to them

Ant says you can make a few posts about them
Click to expand...
There was another instance where he specifically said “a few”, I thought you were referring to that.

 
Agnaa said:
Translation Helpers do not, by default, have permission to post in staff-only threads.

Antvasima's permission to post did seem temporary, as he asked about which specific point was being made, and then said a few posts could be made about that. However, this wasn't the most obvious thing ever, so missing it was understandable.

An interested thread mod can overrule a disinterested bureaucrat's permission to post in a thread, imo. Here "interested" and "disinterested" refer to having direct involvement in the day-to-day posts of a thread.
Click to expand...

Agnaa said:
From the start, Tdjwo and KingNanaya shouldn't have kept bickering about this in the thread. If you're reporting someone for violating a rule like that, I'm fine with gracing one or two posts about it, but after that you should wait for staff or go to the RVR.

I think Wankbreaker's permission to post there should be considered gone until another staff member provides it again. I think Tdjwo and Nanaya should get a light punishment, as they did repeatedly go against a staff member telling them to stop clogging up a staff only thread.

I'm gonna go clean up any superfluous posts from both of these threads.
Click to expand...
Sorry. I was too busy to respond on time.

Idio wasn't helping the case at all because he refused to do something about the issue both KingNanaya and I complained about. Instead, he wrongly assumed Ant gave Wank infinite perms and blaming us instead, despite correcting him. All we both wanted was a staff member to deal with Wankbreaker's comments.
 
Which is why I'm only suggesting a light punishment. You rightly noticed a staff member doing the wrong thing, but you didn't handle it in an appropriate way, such as:
  • Bringing it to the RVR, since it ultimately involved an ordinary-ish user's rule violation being overlooked.
  • Bringing it to HR, since it involved a staff member misapplying the rules.
  • Bringing it to any staff member on their wall or in DMs.
  • Waiting for another staff member present in the thread to wake up and check on things.
Making another 30 posts about the situation in the same staff-only thread doesn't really help, and just ends up derailing. And since you were ultimately doing that, Idiosyncratic's insistence that you stop posting about it there was reasonable.
 
Last thing I'll say is that I've had 1 prior informal warning. I don't want this to drag out any longer, so I'd to receive my punishment sooner rather than later if I'm found deserving. I admit fault for my end of this ordeal. I'll try my best to handle the situation better next time.
 
Agnaa said:
Which is why I'm only suggesting a light punishment. You rightly noticed a staff member doing the wrong thing, but you didn't handle it in an appropriate way, such as:
  • Bringing it to the RVR, since it ultimately involved an ordinary-ish user's rule violation being overlooked.
  • Bringing it to HR, since it involved a staff member misapplying the rules.
  • Bringing it to any staff member on their wall or in DMs.
  • Waiting for another staff member present in the thread to wake up and check on things.
Making another 30 posts about the situation in the same staff-only thread doesn't really help, and just ends up derailing. And since you were ultimately doing that, Idiosyncratic's insistence that you stop posting about it there was reasonable.
Click to expand...
You are right. But I think Wank should be punished as well because he clearly was in the wrong as well.

And I thought tagging a staff member on the thread was enough. I didn't think it was necessary enough to bring to RVT
 
I think Wankbreaker's actions were more understandable. They had plausible (even if ultimately false) reasons to believe they had permission to post, and other than that, were defending themselves from allegations, yet even then, they eventually backed away from the topic, and so clogged the thread up less.

And I didn't say you needed to bring it to the RVT. Given that you told a staff member to have a look, you could've simply waited for them to respond, instead of going into that big back-and-forth. RVT was just one of four options I listed.

Anyway, for the actual amount of Tdjwo/Nanaya's bans, I'd like input from other staff members. I think Tdjwo has more of a history, especially recently, so maybe 3 days for him, and 1 day for Nanaya?
 
I'll accept my punishment. I just want staff members to accurately access issues instead of choosing to take a side. And Wankbreaker should be monitored more as well. This is the second time he's done something report-worthy and gotten away with it because for some reason.
 
vsbattles.com

TenSura LN Major Misleading Revision - Part 1

Can I get the full context behind this or from which volume it is? Volume 19 Slimereader, it's an independent part in and of itself. Rimuru disintegrates Michael's info particles and absorbs him[as a skill] while his consciousness is reduced to God. A very similar scan is this The heart core...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
you're are freaking fool you don't even understand what's being presented to you are you threaten huh when we're just merely trying to explain properly and you're not taking it seriously you're too blind
Click to expand...
Well don't know whom he was refering. Is it to me or @Dog3352 or someone else. Because too many comments were piling up. But this is going extreme. Not to mention it's just derailing without giving any productive input.
 
@Tempestdragon6 You were told in the thread to stop, and you didn't, so I tell you again, this time as a formal warning: knock it off. Play nice or don't play. Even if you're agitated, it's better for all if you just don't post aggro message- it can only possibly serve to make the situation worse. Thank you in advance.
 
Mr. Bambu said:
@Tempestdragon6 You were told in the thread to stop, and you didn't, so I tell you again, this time as a formal warning: knock it off. Play nice or don't play. Even if you're agitated, it's better for all if you just don't post aggro message- it can only possibly serve to make the situation worse. Thank you in advance.
Click to expand...
lock my account for a week I'm tired of all the bullshit i need a break from this shitty site where even staff are bias as ****
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FinePoint
  • Locked
Discussion Rule Word Salad
Replies
22
Views
1K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Agnaa
Fanart Rule Revamp
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FinePoint
  • Locked
Clarifying Death Threat Rules
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Kachon123
One Piece: Planet Size Discussion Rule
Replies
17
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FlipLaScript
Loosening Up Tier 1 Rules
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
Kanogami
Kanogami
Back
Top