- 17,291
- 27,091
Seems fine imo not like he's banned from doing it so sure go for itI'd still like any input on the Tyloxtus situation.
If I get none, I'll declare that he can't edit or create pages without approval from another user for 3 months.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems fine imo not like he's banned from doing it so sure go for itI'd still like any input on the Tyloxtus situation.
If I get none, I'll declare that he can't edit or create pages without approval from another user for 3 months.
Are you wanting input on timeframe? Frankly I'd wanted indefinite, until we can see that he's gotten better.I'd still like any input on the Tyloxtus situation.
If I get none, I'll declare that he can't edit or create pages without approval from another user for 3 months.
Your definition of stonewalling is skewed
Probably not report worthy, but the debate got a little too heated like the previous TR CRT threads due to certain ppl doing it.
Also stonewalling the **** out of the thread too
Because it is literally stonewalling when there is multiple pages regarding the CRT in general.Your definition of stonewalling is skewed
also if its not report worthy why would u post it in a report thread
Multiple pages of a CRT where 10's of people are involved = stonewallingBecause it is literally stonewalling when there is multiple pages regarding the CRT in general.
You practically been going on that CRT like crazy there
It is if it is done multiple times regardless of the number of pplMultiple pages of a CRT where 10's of people are involved = stonewalling
I haven't really been going crazy, I have been debating with I think about 4 people with many different arguments, so I do feel like the thread was bound to last long, of course I severely doubt what I did was stonewalling, is that even a reportable offense ?
Well I wouldn't call it stonewallingIt is if it is done multiple times regardless of the page numbers in this instance.
Hell even before that thread I linked here, the other threads were practically stonewalled to death so there is precedent of these threads should been staff only rather than having to keep getting abused like this where ppl are arguing in circles.
Can you be any more specific? It's almost 300 posts long.
Probably not report worthy, but the debate got a little too heated like the previous TR CRT threads due to certain ppl doing it.
Also stonewalling the **** out of the thread too
These are my thoughts on that thread in general linked below and especially the entire verse im general, this same shit has been going on for the past like 4 or 5 Tokyo revengers crts one of which made its way into 11 pages hell about half the calcs in the about literally are not even allowed by our standards about every other calc they linked in that thread has rejections or disagreement to CGMs and even then they're so blatant about using the calculated ratings to justify the speed of an other FTE verse to make allow higher ends for feats to be used in calcs but to the point I can't even call it hidden calc stacking and it doesn't even seem to be one or two people either its the same individuals from all the past threads minus Vapourrrrr cause he's in the phantom zone but anyways if you want my thoughts by this point and I don't think any staff or CGM especially is gonna disagree with me the verse should just be deleted atp@CloverDragon03 @Dalesean027 Would either of you like to weigh in on this, actually? I notice that you're prolific there on the thread and it may suit the needs of this thread to hear your thoughts.
What Dalesean say, but basically the previous TR threads prior to the one I linked has effectively stone walled due to disagreement from the opposition as well as going against any calc member opinions in supporting the calcs not being usable.Can you be any more specific? It's almost 300 posts long.
Enjoy your breakAlso I am currently at work and just got on break
My guy despises of this verseThese are my thoughts on that thread in general linked below and especially the entire verse im general, this same shit has been going on for the past like 4 or 5 Tokyo revengers crts one of which made its way into 11 pages hell about half the calcs in the about literally are not even allowed by our standards about every other calc they linked in that thread has rejections or disagreement to CGMs and even then they're so blatant about using the calculated ratings to justify the speed of an other FTE verse to make allow higher ends for feats to be used in calcs but to the point I can't even call it hidden calc stacking and it doesn't even seem to be one or two people either its the same individuals from all the past threads minus Vapourrrrr cause he's in the phantom zone but anyways if you want my thoughts by this point and I don't think any staff or CGM especially is gonna disagree with me the verse should just be deleted atp
This ain't a thread for pointless back and forth its not a debate but I'll just leave this here as this is the same guy who you're saying I'm ignoring literally saying outright that I shouldn't have supported the opposition if I wanted to help with anything and that quite literally encapsulates why yall are behaving like this to begin with, it's not what you want so you're all willing to stonewall until the thread is just closed and if anyone thinks any other opinions aside from the ones you like are valid then you'll tell me exactly what he just did that I "shouldn't have supported the opposition "My guy despises of this verse
Stop saying we should delete the verse, people worked hard on it, and the calculations, you couldn't even provide a well structured debunk but you got the support of other people because you have the CGM title, do you have a degree in physics that actually makes you qualified to have the final word, all you have is experience
I won't comment on past threads since I wasn't apart of them but I find it kinda weird how you ignore some of the supporters arguments and how you also say "I'm not entitled to help this verse" when someone says can you reply to my argument, MY GUY your literally the opposition, you have to adrdess his arguments
Agreed.I think in these sorts of cases, it's actually better to just make a staff only thread, and tightly moderate it.
Yeah I agreed to therefir and sherlock on that point in the thread and the suggestion for deleting it is probably just me being annoyed with dealing with this shit on all these threads but I'm fine with thatI think in these sorts of cases, it's actually better to just make a staff only thread, and tightly moderate it. That's been a lot of times before when there's been issues with threads repeatedly being dragged out into oblivion.
Deleting the verse is a very extreme option, and one that I don't think is justified as of now.
@Antvasima are you able to help look into this? It is a fairly noteworthy coincidence.I wonder if @MysticCarnage and @Vapourrrrr are related somehow, as after Vapourrrrr got banned on Jun 27, MysticCarnage joined the forum on the same day. Both of them also exhibit similar behaviors. Is this just a coincidence….
No they are not related. In fact, they both have different discord usernames, and he recently asked me what is his discord username.I wonder if @MysticCarnage and @Vapourrrrr are related somehow, as after Vapourrrrr got banned on Jun 27, MysticCarnage joined the forum on the same day. Both of them also exhibit similar behaviors. Is this just a coincidence….
Imo this is a problem that's been going on for a long time now. The verse has been bogged down by unreliable calcs that not only go against our standards, but seem to go against the narrative of the verse as a whole (Hypersonic characters being wary of being tagged by guns for instance)@CloverDragon03 @Dalesean027 Would either of you like to weigh in on this, actually? I notice that you're prolific there on the thread and it may suit the needs of this thread to hear your thoughts.
Not as far as I can tell, no, but they may of course just have hidden their tracks well.I wonder if @MysticCarnage and @Vapourrrrr are related somehow, as after Vapourrrrr got banned on Jun 27, MysticCarnage joined the forum on the same day. Both of them also exhibit similar behaviors. Is this just a coincidence….
I think in these sorts of cases, it's actually better to just make a staff only thread, and tightly moderate it. That's been a lot of times before when there's been issues with threads repeatedly being dragged out into oblivion.
Deleting the verse is a very extreme option, and one that I don't think is justified as of now.
This solution seems good to me.Imo this is a problem that's been going on for a long time now. The verse has been bogged down by unreliable calcs that not only go against our standards, but seem to go against the narrative of the verse as a whole (Hypersonic characters being wary of being tagged by guns for instance)
Worse still is the fact that the same couple of supporters take personal offense to any sort of staff disapproval of this scuffed scaling, creating poisoned discussions that tend to lead into outright stonewalling, leading to threads that simply never get concluded. I'm in favor of Agnaa's suggestion of creating a staff-only thread that could perhaps revise the verse from the ground up.
He said the derogatory term starting with a w ending with an e used to denote a prostitute. Won't say it or say words similar cause I'm not tryna get in trouble.Reporting @CuteAnimeNekoGirl99 for insulting me with what appears to have been a slur (as it got filtered by the site into "*"s)
While he has been in trouble beforeI do that all the time in FanVerse and everyone is chill about it, I didn't think it would be treated seriously here, I guess every websites are different.
It seems to have been for a completely different issue.JohnCenaNation was banned for making some kind of death threats and ranting about politics iirc, and he also had a long history of downright trolling on a wide variety of verses. I know it was initially passed as him likely being young and naive to properly debate, but a lot of comments he did make did often get out of hand.