- 15,333
- 22,141
I've sent them a warning, though given their track record harsher action might be warranted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am afraid Maverick is right, he did immediately post this after that comment to Raven of his.I've sent them a warning, though given their track record harsher action might be warranted.
I think he just didn't understand what Dread was saying. Both of them were typing in slightly hard-to-understand ways.I am afraid Maverick is right, he did immediately post this after that comment to Raven of his.
He should've apologized to Raven directly first thing instead of someone else doing it for him instead or waiting it out.
Okay then to elaborate on my last post.@Agnaa the fact he’s telling someone else to apologize for him doesn’t tell me he’s sorry for his actions.
I think it does, because this is bad in a completely different way, and he's vastly improved in terms of the behaviour he was banned for.Plus his past 2 bans just tells me he’s not improved his behavior at all.
I appreciate your work, Dread, but this gives a bad precedence that aggressors might try and get the heat off themselves for acts such as this. Not blaming you for it BTW.(Just to add into the discussion, since Klol may miss the post afterward)
I clarified it afterward what I actually meant; but @KLOL506 and @Theglassman12 are still right; he still did not apologize to Raven ?!?
I addressed that mindset in this message, starting from the second line.That’s not an excuse for him to just not apologize. If you need someone else to tell a person you’re sorry, then you clearly don’t know anything about manners.
I addressed that in this message, starting from the second quote.So you just admit that he’s doing something bad, and he’s been banned in the past for other bad behavior. Why the hell are we giving him another slap in the wrist when he’s shown no effort to improve as an individual and just do shit that will get him in trouble?
That seems fine to me.If no-one can think of any prior offenses from CuteAnimeNekoGirl99, I'd suggest just giving a strict warning.
This seems fine to me as well. His comment did not seem very serious, mostly clueless. Also, he did ask and thank somebody else for apologising on his behalf.Here's what he had to say about it
While he has been in trouble before
It seems to have been for a completely different issue.
I'd suggest a strict warning to not say that sorta thing to people who you aren't certain would be okay with it.
Our job isn't babying users. If he doesn't understand, he can stop and ask, not continue. That's normal person behavior.I think he just didn't understand what Dread was saying. Both of them were typing in slightly hard-to-understand ways.
It's no so much that being a policy as "this person has had so many RVR reports it's literally useless to talk about him". Seriously, while I don't remember the exact terms of the previous reports, there was a time a few years back where it felt like JohnCenaNation was being reported every other week, and every time he deigns to be active he somehow ends up in here again.And I don't see the infraction as of the kind where he has to apologize within 10 minutes or else get permabanned.
Plus, I generally think having a policy like "If you don't apologize immediately, we'll ban you" would lead to a bunch of hollow apologies involving no self-reflection, which isn't really what we want.
I can't really tell what situation you're talking about.Our job isn't babying users. If he doesn't understand, he can stop and ask, not continue. That's normal person behavior.
He's been consistently active for the past 3 months. (Before that he was sporadically active for a week or two every month for 3 months).It's no so much that being a policy as "this person has had so many RVR reports it's literally useless to talk about him". Seriously, while I don't remember the exact terms of the previous reports, there was a time a few years where it felt like JohnCenaNation was being reported every other week, and every time he deigns to be active he somehow ends up in here again.
"Every other week" was a figure of speech, as indicated by "felt like". The point is he was reported often. And anyone who says what he said ain't showing any signs of improvement in my book. If anything, that's markedly worse than a lot of what got him in trouble back then.If he's gone from being reported every other week, to being reported once every 3-6 months, that's a marked improvement, and doesn't indicate that he's a lost cause.
If you wish you could report him to FANDOM as well. Get him a cross-website permaban.this is indeed ****** up, he should be charged with non-consensual distribution of intimate images which could lead up to a sentence of 5 years here in Canada.
That seems like a good idea, yes.If you wish you could report him to FANDOM as well. Get him a cross-website permaban.
You can report the user here: https://support.fandom.com/hc/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360000948854
Thanks @Crabwhale again.
Stay safe and take care girl, this is why I never leak my appearance online.Alright well that's pretty disgusting it went from sad to scary imo. Because i already have a history of being stalked irl and online so seeing the comment about him harassing someone that blocked him just kinda makes me think about all that. I'll be fine im sure, but it really puts into perspective how serious even online sexual harassment is. Idk about the severity of it on this site, but the fact it lead to a discussion instead of outright ban leads me to think its not as serious as it should be. Thanks @Crabwhale again. I was trying to give him benefit of the doubt. Made my previous comment completely worthless as i deleted it entirely. Glad he's gone, i have enough stalkers as is
He has been very agressive on TR threads. I remember 2 threads on top of my head, one of which he was topic banned.Was MysticCarnage’s attitude here really necessary?
Tokyo Revengers: Mikey Patada
vsbattles.fandom.com
He apparently edited the comment to make sure he wasn’t being offensive, I might’ve remember he edited out a few derogatory language though I think my point still stands.
Yes, at the least, considering that he said outright that he wants us to ban him completely at this point.He has been very agressive on TR threads. I remember 2 threads on top of my head, one of which he was topic banned.
The stuff he does certainly require a wider topic ban regarding this verse.
I don’t mind banning him. He’s not a helpful member and his toxicity made everyone keep their distance from TR threads to the point of needing a major staff intervention to keep him away from it.Yes, at the least, considering that he said outright that he wants us to ban him completely at this point.
I laughed, you reported me on this my guy, I've seen KLOL say similar things on posts with horrible scalesWas MysticCarnage’s attitude here really necessary?
Tokyo Revengers: Mikey Patada
vsbattles.fandom.com
He apparently edited the comment to make sure he wasn’t being offensive, I might’ve remember he edited out a few derogatory language though I think my point still stands.
Banning me for what ? Toxic behaviour, everything I've said ain't that deep, this aint the legal court system, I've seen you guys ban people for a year for saying kys these things are not that deep and only require a month ban, I wonder how long mine will be, probably a while since you guys over react to everythingI don't mind banning him either, but we preferably need some confirmations from other staff members first.