- 12,459
- 4,480
i will not stop responding then, sorry, your message hadn't loaded for me until now so i couldn't see itPlease don't derail and argue, thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i will not stop responding then, sorry, your message hadn't loaded for me until now so i couldn't see itPlease don't derail and argue, thanks.
Reiner says that a part of the arguments he used in the previous one are no longer valid according to DT's draft.also i asked Reiner
This is what you applied as accepted and what the OP later pointed out as wrong. You have done a very right thing indeed.
Buddy, don't create problems out of thin air.Reporting user @NikHelton for implementing unaccepted calculations onto profiles.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/kengan-ashura-speed-downgrade.161017/
They also made a series of unsolicited changes to Kengenverse profiles two years ago and no one noticed. All of them were changes to statistics without a linked CRT.
Nikaido Ren
Nikaido Ren, also known as The Watchman, is the captain of the Heavenly Wolves, a Chinese mercenary group and currently one of Katahara Metsudo's Bodyguards. He represented Byakuya News during the Kengan Annihilation Tournament, after stealing the affiliated fighter position under Toyo Electric...vsbattles.fandom.com
Kiozan Takeru
My brothers are the failures... modern sumo is a failure. And I'm here to change sumo.Kiozan Kiozan Takeru, formerly known as The Brawler of the Sumo Ring, is a professional jūryō sumo wrestler and an affiliated fighter within the Kengan matches. He represented Magatanien during the Kengan...vsbattles.fandom.com
Those were simply a fraction of the edits.
User contributions for NikHelton | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
Here's a log of it, scroll to the bottom to see almost all the mass suspicious edits they made in 2021. Click on "older 500" to see further edits they made.
Antvasima questioned them and they ignored it.
NikHelton
vsbattles.fandom.com
The profile statistics have been like that ever since then and no one called up for it.
You also changed the results without getting calcs re-evaluated. Can you link the threads ?Buddy, don't create problems out of thin air.
Before throwing slander and false accusations, read the list of threads.
These characteristics were accepted and approved in the Kengan revision section two years ago
Buddy, your Saw Paing calculation was changed and inserted into the verse several times in a row without editing. What are you talking about?You also changed the results without getting calcs re-evaluated. This calls for a pretty big warning imo. Also can you link the threads ?
I have not done that. Can you link the threads were the calc was accepted ?Buddy, your Saw Paing calculation was changed and inserted into the verse several times in a row without editing. What are you talking about?
I have not done that. Can you link the threads were the calc was accepted ?
My apologies. I will add the calcs back.Kengan revision
There is an absolute mess going on in the verse right now, so I made a number of calculations that were accepted. Moreover, the previous user who was updating the verse - Gin, left the wiki and generally agreed with all the calculations. In this way I wanted to reduce the wild gap between the...vsbattles.com
You still need CGM analysis for the calcs either wayKengan revision
There is an absolute mess going on in the verse right now, so I made a number of calculations that were accepted. Moreover, the previous user who was updating the verse - Gin, left the wiki and generally agreed with all the calculations. In this way I wanted to reduce the wild gap between the...vsbattles.com
We are talking about calculation 8-A.You still need CGM analysis for the calcs either way
Alright, I'll drop the case then. However, I think I had every right to report you. You undone several revisions made by Antvasima and when he questioned you on your message wall, you ignored the question. If that won't get people suspicious then I don't know what will, anyway, my apologies.Buddy, don't create problems out of thin air.
Before throwing slander and false accusations, read the list of threads.
These characteristics were accepted and approved in the Kengan revision section two years ago
I scrolled through the entire CRT and everyone agreed with LordGinSama. I didn't have the time to read through the entire thread but seemingly everyone agreed with his points on applying the CRT, which I presumed led to the current status of Kenganverse. I think the case can be dropped.What do other staff members here think about the Kenganverse issue?
Just ask a question in private messages next time.Alright, I'll drop the case then. However, I think I had every right to report you.
We may have connected via private messages or threads. I wouldn't ignore the administrationYou undone several revisions made by Antvasima and when he questioned you on your message wall, you ignored the question. If that won't get people suspicious then I don't know what will, anyway, my apologies.
Yes, that's correctSo if I understand the Ben 10 case correctly, the member who created the revision that omegabronic applied created a new and revised content revision thread after DontTalk changed our standards so the original revision thread was no longer relevant, and then omegabronic applied the original revision without knowing this. Is that correct?
If so, there does not seem to be any malicious punishable intent involved, just cluelessness, but omegabronic's revisions to Ben 10 pages still need to be reverted. Is that also correct?
Reiner made a new thread to see if the information was still acceptable under the new standards, however due to IRL complications he had to get off the wiki for a while and thus the thread was closed, so no conclusion regarding that was reached, leaving the previously accepted CRT still acceptedSo if I understand the Ben 10 case correctly, the member who created the revision that omegabronic applied created a new and revised content revision thread after DontTalk changed our standards so the original revision thread was no longer relevant, and then omegabronic applied the original revision without knowing this. Is that correct?
They wouldn't until someone makes a thread to revert or to cover why the standards affect the threads' results, until then what was accepted was accepted, like, yeah tge standards changed, but no one tried to revise what was previously accepted with a new thread yet, fot it to be reversed someone would need to do that firstIf so, there does not seem to be any malicious punishable intent involved, just cluelessness, but omegabronic's revisions to Ben 10 pages still need to be reverted. Is that also correct?
neco-arc soloes that fodder.Someone vandalised akuto sai (manga) profile
It looks like they were even warned by Garrixian previously.
Maybe ignored the warning.It looks like they were even warned by Garrixian previously.
I am still waiting for a definitive response to solve this issue.Snip
Hmm. It seems like Reiner is taking a break from this community. Is anybody else willing to handle it?
I gave them a 6 months block, but let them keep their ability to respond to their message wall, in case there is a misunderstanding that we need to clear up.This is his second time doing it. @GarrixianXD warned him before for the exact same violation in the past 24 hours; additionally, within this same week he was warned by DDM. Both provided the user instructions on how to become a productive member, but they seemingly ignored it. This member clearly does not intend on doing anything, but cause harm so I have applied a Temporary 1 day ban to stop them from doing any more damage, until staff decide on an appropriate ban length.
Well, I do not think that any punishment seems necessary, but it is probably best to revert the edits until a more proper decision has been reached.I am still waiting for a definitive response to solve this issue.
I will either undo the edits or create a thread, depending on the answer.
Thanks in advance
Alright. I'll undo the edits in a few hours, thenWell, I do not think that any punishment seems necessary, but it is probably best to revert the edits until a more proper decision has been reached.
I would like to say that if anything would to be done about it, it would need to be a thread re evaluating the infor mation to see if it matches the standards, since as i have explained, the thread in question is currently accepted and no thread was made contesting it and concluded
Okay. What do the rest of our staff members here think?I would like to say that if anything would to be done about it, it would need to be a thread re evaluating the infor mation to see if it matches the standards, since as i have explained, the thread in question is currently accepted and no thread was made contesting it and concluded
Could you also ping the staff that were involved with the thread in question here? I feel like their view is important on the matter, the ones that you haven't tagged yet would be @Planck69 @EliminatorVenom and @Lonkitt
yes a new crt was needed before making changes (because reiner is gone) but omegabronic applied the old crt without opening a new crt so the changes should be undone and a new crt should be opened if needed.Alright, I didn't speak on it, as it's been a bad couple of weeks and I'm not trying to get involved in every RVR thing. Let's see if I understand: Omega put through the results of an accepted thread, but then there was an immediate change that would then require a new thread, meaning we ought to undo Omega's current thing and let them set up a new thread to put the proper changes to, is that more or less correct?
After the thread was closed and DT posted his own draft, the OP started a new thread, arguing that according to the new standards the previous one was wrong and that proposal according to the new standards should be as in the new OP, and then had that thread closed at his own request.Omega put through the results of an accepted thread
Alright. In that case, it's probably fine to pursue the subject and undo the changes. Definitely no actual rule violation though, and no punishment needs doled out. Are you able to undo the changes yourself or do you need assistance?After the thread was closed and DT posted his own draft, the OP started a new thread, arguing that according to the new standards the previous one was wrong and that promotion according to the new standards should be as in the new OP, and then had that thread closed at his own request.
In short, there is something that was left unfinished and then tried to be fixed and left again
we changed open profiles but closed profiles need to be openedAlright. In that case, it's probably fine to pursue the subject and undo the changes. Definitely no actual rule violation though, and no punishment needs doled out. Are you able to undo the changes yourself or do you need assistance?