GarrixianXD
University Enthusiast
Any/AllVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,385
- 8,173
Please don't derail and argue, thanks.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 9,987
- 3,412
I kept track of the thread that was changing the standards for Hypertimelines, no the ben 10 one
That is not how this works, the thread was on hold because another one covering the information accepted was opened, however since that other one wasn't accepted and in fact never concluded, then it leaves the accepted status of the previous one untouched, thus making it so that it can be applied, i looked through the rules and found nothing of what you are just saying, so i don't think i am breaking any rule here
also i asked Reiner if i could apply the thread since the other one was closed with no conclusion, and he said that i could, so i assumed that if even the OP of the thread was ok with me applying and nothing on the rules said that i couldn't, i just assumed that applying the accepted thread was just natural like any other accepted thread
It was not "moved", another thread on the topic was created and then not concluded, the previous thread was accepted, i don't understand what you mean by "arbitrary" in this context, i also don't see in the rules anything about "not applying accepted thread because another one on the topic was created", i don't understand what rule i broke
i didn't even know that the thread was not applied until now, if i did i would have applied it sooner, i don't know what is strange about it? i don't participate too much in Ben 10 thread nowadays
Last edited:
- 9,987
- 3,412
i will not stop responding then, sorry, your message hadn't loaded for me until now so i couldn't see it
Benimōru
He/Him- 468
- 405
Reiner says that a part of the arguments he used in the previous one are no longer valid according to DT's draft.
This is what you applied as accepted and what the OP later pointed out as wrong. You have done a very right thing indeed.
Also, what he wants to have re-approved in the second revision is what was accepted before the standards changed, and it needs to be reviewed again after the standards. You can't just apply it to the profile. If this was going to be applied, there was no need to even open the 2nd revision. Which you guys have gone and opened a 2nd revision to get it approved again.
Anyways, I won't answer any longer.
- 9,987
- 3,412
and until said revision happened the accepted information is what is currently accepted, Reiner said that in his thread, but he also said that he was looking for clarification in the same thread that could potentially make the standards stay the same
however, regardless of his intention, the thread was never accepted by any staff, hence no conclusion came out of it, so the accepted information prevails for now, hence why i applied it
This will be my last response for now, as i absolutely do not want to go back and forth in the Report thread as i am pretty sure that is not allowed, if you could do the same i would be thankful, all we need to do for now is wait for the staff to evaluate the situation, we answering each other and frankly repeat ourselves doesn't help
however, regardless of his intention, the thread was never accepted by any staff, hence no conclusion came out of it, so the accepted information prevails for now, hence why i applied it
This will be my last response for now, as i absolutely do not want to go back and forth in the Report thread as i am pretty sure that is not allowed, if you could do the same i would be thankful, all we need to do for now is wait for the staff to evaluate the situation, we answering each other and frankly repeat ourselves doesn't help
- 2,802
- 1,576
Buddy, don't create problems out of thin air.Reporting user @NikHelton for implementing unaccepted calculations onto profiles.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/kengan-ashura-speed-downgrade.161017/
They also made a series of unsolicited changes to Kengenverse profiles two years ago and no one noticed. All of them were changes to statistics without a linked CRT.
Nikaido Ren
Nikaido Ren, also known as The Watchman, is the captain of the Heavenly Wolves, a Chinese mercenary group and currently one of Katahara Metsudo's Bodyguards. He represented Byakuya News during the Kengan Annihilation Tournament, after stealing the affiliated fighter position under Toyo Electric...vsbattles.fandom.com
Kiozan Takeru
Kiozan Takeru, formerly known as The Brawler of the Sumo Ring, is a professional jūryō sumo wrestler and an affiliated fighter within the Kengan matches. He represented Magatanien during the Kengan Annihilation Tournament. He had a terrible reputation for always getting into fights, being...
Those were simply a fraction of the edits.
User contributions for NikHelton | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
Here's a log of it, scroll to the bottom to see almost all the mass suspicious edits they made in 2021. Click on "older 500" to see further edits they made.
Antvasima questioned them and they ignored it.
NikHelton
The profile statistics have been like that ever since then and no one called up for it.
Before throwing slander and false accusations, read the list of threads.
These characteristics were accepted and approved in the Kengan revision section two years ago
Vzearr
He/Him- 1,327
- 823
You also changed the results without getting calcs re-evaluated. Can you link the threads ?
TWILIGHT-OP
He/Him- 2,434
- 1,195
Ik this isn't rvr worthy, but Can someone plz give @Hmptaka a notice, he is unaware of how to add himself as verse supporters and making visual edits incorrectly.
- 2,802
- 1,576
Buddy, your Saw Paing calculation was changed and inserted into the verse several times in a row without editing. What are you talking about?
Vzearr
He/Him- 1,327
- 823
I have not done that. Can you link the threads were the calc was accepted ?
- 2,802
- 1,576
Kengan revision
There is an absolute mess going on in the verse right now, so I made a number of calculations that were accepted. Moreover, the previous user who was updating the verse - Gin, left the wiki and generally agreed with all the calculations. In this way I wanted to reduce the wild gap between the...
Vzearr
He/Him- 1,327
- 823
My apologies. I will add the calcs back.Kengan revision
There is an absolute mess going on in the verse right now, so I made a number of calculations that were accepted. Moreover, the previous user who was updating the verse - Gin, left the wiki and generally agreed with all the calculations. In this way I wanted to reduce the wild gap between the...vsbattles.com
- 7,920
- 8,242
You still need CGM analysis for the calcs either wayKengan revision
There is an absolute mess going on in the verse right now, so I made a number of calculations that were accepted. Moreover, the previous user who was updating the verse - Gin, left the wiki and generally agreed with all the calculations. In this way I wanted to reduce the wild gap between the...
- 2,802
- 1,576
We are talking about calculation 8-A.
I'll just do the speed calculations again and post it so it matches the rules
- 165,218
- 72,247
- Thread starter
- #24,095
So if I understand the Ben 10 case correctly, the member who created the revision that omegabronic applied created a new and revised content revision thread after DontTalk changed our standards so the original revision thread was no longer relevant, and then omegabronic applied the original revision without knowing this. Is that correct?
If so, there does not seem to be any malicious punishable intent involved, just cluelessness, but omegabronic's revisions to Ben 10 pages still need to be reverted. Is that also correct?
If so, there does not seem to be any malicious punishable intent involved, just cluelessness, but omegabronic's revisions to Ben 10 pages still need to be reverted. Is that also correct?
Last edited:
GarrixianXD
University Enthusiast
Any/AllVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,385
- 8,173
Alright, I'll drop the case then. However, I think I had every right to report you. You undone several revisions made by Antvasima and when he questioned you on your message wall, you ignored the question. If that won't get people suspicious then I don't know what will, anyway, my apologies.
I scrolled through the entire CRT and everyone agreed with LordGinSama. I didn't have the time to read through the entire thread but seemingly everyone agreed with his points on applying the CRT, which I presumed led to the current status of Kenganverse. I think the case can be dropped.
- 2,802
- 1,576
Just ask a question in private messages next time.
Sorry if I responded harshly to your complaint. Now I work seven days a week and am very tired.
We may have connected via private messages or threads. I wouldn't ignore the administration
Benimōru
He/Him- 468
- 405
Yes, that's correct
- 9,987
- 3,412
Reiner made a new thread to see if the information was still acceptable under the new standards, however due to IRL complications he had to get off the wiki for a while and thus the thread was closed, so no conclusion regarding that was reached, leaving the previously accepted CRT still accepted
They wouldn't until someone makes a thread to revert or to cover why the standards affect the threads' results, until then what was accepted was accepted, like, yeah tge standards changed, but no one tried to revise what was previously accepted with a new thread yet, fot it to be reversed someone would need to do that first
To be more clear, while the standards have changed, to conclude if they affect what was accepted require another crt to be made to evaluate that, from what i see they don't affect much of anything thay was accepted for ben 10, but then again, a crt covering that is necsesary to see if anything affects what was accepted
Standards change all the time, to see if them affect the accepted information requires a CRT
Last edited:
TWILIGHT-OP
He/Him- 2,434
- 1,195
Last edited:
- 3,346
- 1,902
neco-arc soloes that fodder.
also, i've undone the vandal's edit
Last edited:
- 1,078
- 2,492
It looks like they were even warned by Garrixian previously.
TWILIGHT-OP
He/Him- 2,434
- 1,195
Maybe ignored the warning.
- 1,664
- 2,603
This is his second time doing it. @GarrixianXD warned him before for the exact same violation in the past 24 hours; additionally, within this same week he was warned by DDM. Both provided the user instructions on how to become a productive member, but they seemingly ignored it. This member clearly does not intend on doing anything, but cause harm so I have applied a Temporary 1 day ban to stop them from doing any more damage, until staff decide on an appropriate ban length.
Benimōru
He/Him- 468
- 405
I am still waiting for a definitive response to solve this issue.
I will either undo the edits or create a thread, depending on the answer.
Thanks in advance
- 165,218
- 72,247
- Thread starter
- #24,109
- 165,218
- 72,247
- Thread starter
- #24,110
Hmm. It seems like Reiner is taking a break from this community. Is anybody else willing to handle it?
- 165,218
- 72,247
- Thread starter
- #24,111
I gave them a 6 months block, but let them keep their ability to respond to their message wall, in case there is a misunderstanding that we need to clear up.
IgglePowerPiggle
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 165,218
- 72,247
- Thread starter
- #24,112
Well, I do not think that any punishment seems necessary, but it is probably best to revert the edits until a more proper decision has been reached.
Benimōru
He/Him- 468
- 405
Alright. I'll undo the edits in a few hours, thenWell, I do not think that any punishment seems necessary, but it is probably best to revert the edits until a more proper decision has been reached.
- 9,987
- 3,412
I would like to say that if anything would to be done about it, it would need to be a thread re evaluating the infor mation to see if it matches the standards, since as i have explained, the thread in question is currently accepted and no thread was made contesting it and concluded
This was the thread that was accepted: https://vsbattles.com/threads/ben-10-re-justification-of-low-1-c.160533/
And this was the thread @Benimōru is saying tgat revert it: https://vsbattles.com/threads/ben-10-downgrade-upgrade-re-re-justification.160610/
However as everyone can see, that thread was never accepted or concluded, so until one about the subject is concluded, we must go with the thread that was accepted, as no other thread on the matter was made
Last edited:
- 165,218
- 72,247
- Thread starter
- #24,115
Okay. What do the rest of our staff members here think?
@DarkDragonMedeus @Mr._Bambu @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @Agnaa @Just_a_Random_Butler @DarkGrath
- 9,987
- 3,412
Could you also ping the staff that were involved with the thread in question here? I feel like their view is important on the matter, the ones that you haven't tagged yet would be @Planck69 @EliminatorVenom and @Lonkitt
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 21,600
- 19,126
Alright, I didn't speak on it, as it's been a bad couple of weeks and I'm not trying to get involved in every RVR thing. Let's see if I understand: Omega put through the results of an accepted thread, but then there was an immediate change that would then require a new thread, meaning we ought to undo Omega's current thing and let them set up a new thread to put the proper changes to, is that more or less correct?
- 544
- 406
yes a new crt was needed before making changes (because reiner is gone) but omegabronic applied the old crt without opening a new crt so the changes should be undone and a new crt should be opened if needed.
- 14,761
- 20,614
Agree with undoing the changes then.
Benimōru
He/Him- 468
- 405
After the thread was closed and DT posted his own draft, the OP started a new thread, arguing that according to the new standards the previous one was wrong and that proposal according to the new standards should be as in the new OP, and then had that thread closed at his own request.
In short, there is something that was left unfinished and then tried to be fixed and left unfinished again
Similar threads
