• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

Seems to be adding things that definitely shouldn't be on the profile
 
Seems to be adding things that definitely shouldn't be on the profile
Warned. I used my bot account since I forgot my main account password; I sent Fandom a request to recover my account, but they have not responded.
 
Dem Roblox kids are at it again


 
Last edited:
Dem Roblox kids are at it again


Permaban
 
Warned. I used my bot account since I forgot my main account password; I sent Fandom a request to recover my account, but they have not responded.
I will try to help you with mediating with Fandom if necessary. 🙏
 
Rimuru (WN) is listed as 1-C because he only received 2 agreements, which is not enough in this wiki. Because this CRT has large material, so it need at least 3 agreements by staff members are required:
  • In cases where the series verse has a significant following or a large amount of material has been published based on its content, it may be necessary to seek approval from a minimum of three staff members to ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and agree with the proposed revisions
So 1-C need to remove and and open this CRT again because it should have 3 agree by staffs
 
Rimuru (WN) is listed as 1-C because he only received 2 agreements, which is not enough in this wiki. Because this CRT has large material, so it need at least 3 agreements by staff members are required:

So 1-C need to remove and and open this CRT again because it should have 3 agree by staffs
Hmm, @Antvasima gave them permission to apply the thread, so it count as Ant agreement
 
He literally said he not agree with CRT.
It seems like the current rule is what was decided, even though I do not think that it really makes sense, so you can probably apply this revision then.
He talk about the rule do not make sense, which you can see in the previous page, later he said they can probably apply this revision, which is the CRT
 
All information was removed and changed to some kind of nonsense.
 
All information was removed and changed to some kind of nonsense.
Sans stomps guy? It changed immediately after I closed my tab and opened it again. I was shocked for a sec.
 
This is a bit late, but I would like to report @Mister6ame6 for the application of this thread.

To begin with, the thread was not accepted by any staff, the only one who commented was Planck69, but he only asked someone to summarize the thread and if the cut text was still being argued, he didn't agree with the thread.

There is also some problems with the application on the pages since as you can see, technology manipulation, fusionism, acausality/self-sustenance 1 weren't part of the OP, and yet they were also added to the pages (On top of the thread having no staff approval).

Another detail is the poor formatting, for example: the *[[Statistics Reduction|‘’‘Statistics Reduction’‘’]] *[[Technology Manipulation|'''Techonology Manipulation''']] * [[Plant Manipulation|'''Plant Manipulation''']], among others you can see in the link I left above, which are violations of the editing guides.
 
All information was removed and changed to some kind of nonsense.
I reverted the vandalism and banned the vandal. 🙏
 
This is a bit late, but I would like to report @Mister6ame6 for the application of this thread.

To begin with, the thread was not accepted by any staff, the only one who commented was Planck69, but he only asked someone to summarize the thread and if the cut text was still being argued, he didn't agree with the thread.

There is also some problems with the application on the pages since as you can see, technology manipulation, fusionism, acausality/self-sustenance 1 weren't part of the OP, and yet they were also added to the pages (On top of the thread having no staff approval).

Another detail is the poor formatting, for example: the *[[Statistics Reduction|‘’‘Statistics Reduction’‘’]] *[[Technology Manipulation|'''Techonology Manipulation''']] * [[Plant Manipulation|'''Plant Manipulation''']], among others you can see in the link I left above, which are violations of the editing guides.
@Mister6ame6
 

Serious vandalism with High 1-A rating/tiering along with other minor rating/tiering, while i did remember there is an ongoing LotM CRT, there is no CRT attached to the edit, the edit also very amateurish

Edit: i reverted the edit

This is the user, while i'm not a mod and i don't want to sound like a jerk, but the user name look like a red flag to me
 

Serious vandalism with High 1-A rating/tiering along with other minor rating/tiering, while i did remember there is an ongoing LotM CRT, there is no CRT attached to the edit, the edit also very amateurish

Edit: i reverted the edit

This is the user, while i'm not a mod and i don't want to sound like a jerk, but the user name look like a red flag to me
LOTM was recently upgraded to 1-A iirc, but not High 1-A. I'll drop a warning, but if other staff thinks a ban should be intact, then I'll also be in support of it.
 

 
Roger one is just complete nonsense. Adding duplicate powers, like Non-Standard Breathing. When he already has Self-Sustenance (Type 1) and then there's the 11-A via being in the stories of books... which, idek where to start on that.

Mechano tho, is by @Frieza_force_soldier_100, a rather well known user here. No CRT linked, and poor editing on the AP, Durability, etc. What gives?
 

It seems he agreed according to this comment of his in the thread.
This only get 2 agrees
 
This only get 2 agrees
Straight-up applying tier 1 CRTs with only 2 agreements is discouraged. Unless one of the staff approves of it to be applied.
 
This only get 2 agrees
Straight-up applying tier 1 CRTs with only 2 agreements is discouraged. Unless one of the staff approves of it to be applied.
@ByArrow

You seem to have misunderstood our rules here. 🙏
 
probably better if someone ping staff to the thread, from the look of it, the CRT is not very active
Well, I prefer to not encourage other members to rely on me in that particular area, given my constant overwork with other tasks. 🙏
 
@ByArrow

You seem to have misunderstood our rules here. 🙏
I thought two votes were enough if there were no staff votes against it.
Straight-up applying tier 1 CRTs with only 2 agreements is discouraged. Unless one of the staff approves of it to be applied.
GarrixianXD said that two staff members are enough if one staff member approves it to be applied. So can you ping the staff members here who have accepted the CRT? Let them say whether they approve the applied of CRT or not. It will be faster that way.
 
GarrixianXD said that two staff members are enough if one staff member approves it to be applied. So can you ping the staff members here who have accepted the CRT? Let them say whether they approve the applied of CRT or not. It will be faster that way.
That's only based on my experience that I once had a Low 1-C CRT that passed with 2 staff votes, and told that I can apply the thread with 2 staff votes. Though, looking back, that CRT merely only applied to one single character's hax and was only Low 1-C, while your CRT seems rather verse-wide and is High 1-C. So after consideration, the 2 cases should not be compared and I think you still gotta seek out 3 staff approvals nonetheless. Especially since its Arrowverse, which is a DC hence can arise quite a lot of popularity and controversy.
 
I think that 3 staff votes in favour of a revision are required for it to be applied if it concerns a popular verse or high tier statistics, or both in combination. 🙏
 
That's only based on my experience that I once had a Low 1-C CRT that passed with 2 staff votes, and told that I can apply the thread with 2 staff votes. Though, looking back, that CRT merely only applied to one single character's hax and was only Low 1-C, while your CRT seems rather verse-wide and is High 1-C. So after consideration, the 2 cases should not be compared and I think you still gotta seek out 3 staff approvals nonetheless. Especially since its Arrowverse, which is a DC hence can arise quite a lot of popularity and controversy.
I think that 3 staff votes in favour of a revision are required for it to be applied if it concerns a popular verse or high tier statistics, or both in combination. 🙏
Then can you unlock the CRT? And if possible, can you ping one or two members of staff?
 
Back
Top