Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

[Tonygameman]

Once again, by a new user.

 

[ReaperAndBlues]

Once again, by a new user.

We have a dedicated thread for profile deletion. Just for future reference.

 

[Antvasima]

I am fine fine with GrathOfLux's conclusions here.

Also, can other staff members evaluate Eficiente's complaints please?

 

[Eficiente]

As for the Styrm report, while I'm not really saying he's the most civilized user, Eficiente really isn't behaving that much better tbh; some of his responses to Styrm were moderately pompous.

Could you site those ones please? Also, this comment comes across as odd to me; I point out a user misbehaving, and you don't reply to it, you reflect it back at me; Does this mean those moderately pompous responses were misbehavior as well? If so, I would like to know how so so I can do better, or source this as an example of what's viewed as misbehavior. If they're not misbehavior, well, that's the odd part.

This can be in a pm.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Could you site those ones please? Also, this comment comes across as odd to me; I point out a user misbehaving, and you don't reply to it, you reflect it back at me; Does this mean those moderately pompous responses were misbehavior as well? If so, I would like to know how so so I can do better, or source this as an example of what's viewed as misbehavior. If they're not misbehavior, well, that's the odd part.

This can be in a pm.

This first sentence here was pompous.

Don't make stuff up. My first argument was 1 interpretation being more likely than another interpretation due to being simpler, the other being literally infinitely more complex. That's a logical throughline, you don't see it and so you don't counter it.

And aside from that, while not really violations or against the rules, "Whataboutism" allegations IMO seem to be based on gross misunderstandings. A lot of people are in the mentality that "Whataboutism" simply means bringing up other verses. But the dictionary definition of "Whataboutism" is basically trying to respond to an allegation or difficult question with an even bigger allegation or more difficult question. I do not think making a simple statement about Dragon Ball Heroes having Immeasurable via objects that travel forward and backwards in time with ease. Responding to an interrogative sentence with another interrogative sentence is more or less what a whataboutism is; it's hard for declarative sentences to be classified as such.

You saying that because you don't want it to be Immeasurable isn't an argument.

Is probably a whataboutism, but

We literally have Dragon Ball Heroes' Dark Dragon Balls to be Immeasurable off the same argument too after all, this isn't any different.

is not really a whataboutism.

I don't really have much to say regarding some other things you linked and do not think many other comments were too bad. I agree Strym should avoid calling you "Lil Bro," and that some of his earlier posts are more accusatory than necessary. But I actually do agree with him that simply saying "Whataboutism" isn't a proper counterargument to some of those points.