- 8,826
- 9,413
You didn't link to the exact post
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 363
- 150
1) never mocked anyone
2) I have the right to make a complaint or post my opinion whatever I want especially when it's factual
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,626
- 4,350
There are so many, just read the thread.
- 8,826
- 9,413
Now that I've gone through the thread, I don't really see how exactly he's mocking anyone but rather sharing his own personal views
KingNanaya
He/Him- 3,163
- 4,395
believe it was this posthttps://cdn.**********.com/attachments/1057351591453265970/1175193046007152680/image.png?ex=656a56d0&is=6557e1d0&hm=442286a0ebdc6c26dfca465d953bb7d75b275787b3b45e421ca49076e0a0c810&
- 8,826
- 9,413
Oh, then that is pretty condescending. But I don't think it warrants anything harsh
- 363
- 150
Finally someone with a brain, as you can see I only braught up pokemon as an example to explain why their arguments are just wrong but somehow it's called "mocking"...
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,557
Also this one I feel was uncalled for personally. There was zero reason for such attitude. Plus a condescending attitude.
- 363
- 150
Because he said that he's going to "muh report me" because he couldn't handle an opinion and somehow it's called "mocking", if anything the one who should be getting a warning is him
Last edited:
- 2,060
- 3,918
Can you not with these kinda comments? Especially in the RVR thread. There’s no need to act like you’re superior to everyone around you.
I’m in support of a warning. The condescending attitude for literally no reason is just annoying and will only serve to instigate more conflicts in the future.
- 8,826
- 9,413
Please simmer down, and you did kinda derail the thread with the whataboutism.
- 363
- 150
The thread ended a few days ago so I honestly don't see how I was derailing tbh
- 363
- 150
Wasn't my intention but my apologies I guess
Except there is a Reason ?
- 5,163
- 11,792
I’m also in support of a warning.
- 8,826
- 9,413
It really doesn't matter if it ended or whatnot, you just don't derail threads at all period.
Also, I originally wasn't really going to do anything, but now that I'm sensing more condescending attitude. I'm just going to issue an official warning. Please stop
- 363
- 150
I really didn't do anything harsh to deserve a warning but do as you please I guess
Don't think there is anything left for me to say
- 1,628
- 1,789
User did a poor edit tier change to Lucifero's profile
- 5,163
- 11,792
I already warned them. Since they won't listen, I gave them a yearly block. Not to mention they've been blocked for 6 months already before committing violations.
- 7,915
- 15,096
I'm also in support of a warning here.
- 5,163
- 11,792
@Deagonx Propellus already gave them a warning.
- 12,785
- 23,073
Ok, I wouldn't say that the previous block is justified as such, since for such a minor change only a light warning would be necessary, it seems that Ant in 2021 was less lenient, also the changes made to the profile may have some basis and I have heard of Tier 5 BC so I don't blame the user, but you should also have given him more detailed instructions, the current edit doesn't warrant a ban so I will unban him and give him those instructions.
- 5,163
- 11,792
Fair, though, if they're going to commit further violations after you leave them more instructions then I'm all in for a ban. I didn't leave instructions out the first time because I thought they were an old user, but oh well.
- 177,727
- 90,785
- Thread starter
- #24,064
That seems reasonable, yes. Thank you for helping out.
I have worked a lot with developing my personal character in a more positive direction, and have also gradually grown more experienced, so I likely made a mistake back then, yes.
- 10,201
- 9,958
Ah, thanks.
Last edited:
- 2,060
- 3,918
I have removed the outdated portion from the common editing mistakes page.
- 177,727
- 90,785
- Thread starter
- #24,069
Yes, but @ImmortalDread will use a mass-editing script to handle it, so it seems like a bad idea to handle it entirely manually and spam our recent changes page in the process.
- 18,393
- 14,332
Yes, I am now creating coding lines and test it before applying it. I would appreciate it if anyone leave it as it is.
- 35,097
- 41,723
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,075
- 29,797
It certainly isn't nice, but it's such a harmless slew of "insults" that I'm slow to recommend even a warning. Dude just needs to be a lot more mature when interacting with others.
- 2,993
- 1,989
Okay, okay; I'm sorry for the "insults", but in all fairness, we were asked to take it to our message walls or DMs in the Super Mario discussion thread, and Blunt did reply first on mine after all. The whole convo has been deleted because I don't wanna continue it any further.
- 5,163
- 11,792
Reporting user @NikHelton for implementing unaccepted calculations onto profiles.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/kengan-ashura-speed-downgrade.161017/
They also made a series of unsolicited changes to Kengenverse profiles two years ago and no one noticed. All of them were changes to statistics without a linked CRT.
vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com
Those were simply a fraction of the edits.
vsbattles.fandom.com
Here's a log of it, scroll to the bottom to see almost all the mass suspicious edits they made in 2021. Click on "older 500" to see further edits they made.
Antvasima questioned them and they ignored it.
vsbattles.fandom.com
The profile statistics have been like that ever since then and no one called up for it.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/kengan-ashura-speed-downgrade.161017/
They also made a series of unsolicited changes to Kengenverse profiles two years ago and no one noticed. All of them were changes to statistics without a linked CRT.
Nikaido Ren
Nikaido Ren, also known as The Watchman, is the captain of the Heavenly Wolves, a Chinese mercenary group and currently one of Katahara Metsudo's Bodyguards. He represented Byakuya News during the Kengan Annihilation Tournament, after stealing the affiliated fighter position under Toyo Electric...
vsbattles.fandom.com
Kiozan Takeru
Kiozan Takeru, formerly known as The Brawler of the Sumo Ring, is a professional jūryō sumo wrestler and an affiliated fighter within the Kengan matches. He represented Magatanien during the Kengan Annihilation Tournament. He had a terrible reputation for always getting into fights, being...
vsbattles.fandom.com
Those were simply a fraction of the edits.
Access Restricted | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
Here's a log of it, scroll to the bottom to see almost all the mass suspicious edits they made in 2021. Click on "older 500" to see further edits they made.
Antvasima questioned them and they ignored it.
NikHelton
vsbattles.fandom.com
The profile statistics have been like that ever since then and no one called up for it.
Benimōru
He/Him- 468
- 407
I am reporting the user @omegabronic for applying a thread to the profile that was decided before the revision about the standards was finished and then canceled due to the change of standards.
And after the staff thread about these standards is completed, Reinar (who opened the previous thread) opens a new thread with new standards (basically, the previous thread is being moved to new one). And the thread he opened was closed at his own request and not completed.
TL;DR
In short, Omegabronic has arbitrarily applied a thread to the profile that was not yet clear because of the standards and which was then moved to another thread and closed.
And after the staff thread about these standards is completed, Reinar (who opened the previous thread) opens a new thread with new standards (basically, the previous thread is being moved to new one). And the thread he opened was closed at his own request and not completed.
TL;DR
In short, Omegabronic has arbitrarily applied a thread to the profile that was not yet clear because of the standards and which was then moved to another thread and closed.
Last edited:
- 14,135
- 5,637
......i am sorry, i don't understand? i applied the thread because it was accepted, i keep in track with that thread and.....it pretty much doesn't affect the Ben 10 one at all from what i can read of the new standard
the new thread was not concluded, aka nothing of it affects the other ones that were accepted, if the standards changing affects the thread, then anyone can make a thread to change the ratings based on that, but not applying an accepted thread because of another thread was created and then abadoned makes no sense, just make another one to talk about the topic of the closed one and then downgrade or upgrade based on that
there was more than 4 staff aprovals for the thread, it was accepted hence it has to be applied, i read the standards and saw nothing that would disqualify the thread, and then when another thread seeing that was created, it was not concluded, hence i applied the accepted thread because it was accepted
i honestly don't see the problem in what i did, if the new standards go against the rating then someone can just open another thread to change the rating of what was accepted, i don't see what i did that was report worthy
TD;DR: I did nothing but applied an accepted thread, the standards changed and a thread covering for the verse was then was then closed, hence the previous accepted thread had to be applied since it was accepted, if it really contradict the standards someone can make a thread later changing it by continuing the closed thread
Benimōru
He/Him- 468
- 407
You were following the thread but you applied it 10 days after the thread was closed?
The point is not that you read the standards and decide whether that would qualify or not, but that the person who opened the thread opens a new one after the standards have changed, leaves the previous one in place, and waits for the new one to be accepted. This means that the thread is moved to a new one. Which means that the previous one is no longer relevant.
You arbitrarily applied something to the profile that was clearly moved to another thread. And strangely you say that the thread was accepted and should be applied, but you do it 10 days after the thread was closed. How strange
Edit: Also, it should not be overlooked that all the staff who wrote that revision accepted it according to the old standards, saying "if these are the standards". So both the standards have changed and the OP has created another thread for re-justification.
Last edited:
- 5,163
- 11,792
Please don't derail and argue, thanks.
- 14,135
- 5,637
I kept track of the thread that was changing the standards for Hypertimelines, no the ben 10 one
That is not how this works, the thread was on hold because another one covering the information accepted was opened, however since that other one wasn't accepted and in fact never concluded, then it leaves the accepted status of the previous one untouched, thus making it so that it can be applied, i looked through the rules and found nothing of what you are just saying, so i don't think i am breaking any rule here
also i asked Reiner if i could apply the thread since the other one was closed with no conclusion, and he said that i could, so i assumed that if even the OP of the thread was ok with me applying and nothing on the rules said that i couldn't, i just assumed that applying the accepted thread was just natural like any other accepted thread
It was not "moved", another thread on the topic was created and then not concluded, the previous thread was accepted, i don't understand what you mean by "arbitrary" in this context, i also don't see in the rules anything about "not applying accepted thread because another one on the topic was created", i don't understand what rule i broke
i didn't even know that the thread was not applied until now, if i did i would have applied it sooner, i don't know what is strange about it? i don't participate too much in Ben 10 thread nowadays
Last edited:
- 14,135
- 5,637
i will not stop responding then, sorry, your message hadn't loaded for me until now so i couldn't see it
