- 5,070
- 2,886
My misunderstanding then, sorry about that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A few of these, I wouldn't consider noteworthy enough to take action on. As I've noted before, making fallacies is not report-worthy by itself. Also, while I don't believe he is correct in his accusations regarding the motives of his debate opponents, it would be inappropriate to enforce punishments on claims of genuine opinions. We've set the precedent in the past that, even if they may be incorrect or taken poorly, users should not be punished for making claims about reality that they legitimately believe are true (unless the claims in question are manifestly ignorant and/or offensive).i'm reporting @DekuGlazer for Fallacies abuse (Appeal. To. Motive. fallacies, Fallacy Fallacy) Blatantly ignoring posts (and claiming his haven't been answered (i've answered this post too, he just answered to Zetsu's and said it)), Creating a power for his opponent claiming somehow it makes the character who he supports not killable by it (starts here, somehow despite many tries, he stayed with this point for much time starting on it), refusing to add a vote without a reason (giving himself the power to do so), and claiming i'm doing rule-breaking posts without a base.
the threads i noticed it were
Xande vs Mikey
Dazai vs Seven
Ayanokouji vs Jiu Jitae
it's become pretty annoying to discuss with this guy.
To expand on this, I've been able to get in touch with SparxGaming12 regarding the ban appeal request.Thank you. That would be greatly appreciated.
Thank your for your response,To expand on this, I've been able to get in touch with SparxGaming12 regarding the ban appeal request.
To offer my take on the situation - I believe lifting the ban is justified. I would recommend keeping an eye on him in the time after he returns, but I'd be comfortable saying he's capable of being a productive member of the community.
oh sorry about that. I'm kinda new to vsbwiki and didn't know about the crt thingIt looks like he was already brought up on this page of the thread, but this user keeps changing statistics of Scream characters without a CRT
Some of the edits are good, they're just adding feats, but changing stats and removing feats is another story. I understand why they're doing this, as sometimes it isn't clear which character is doing what (the killers all wear the same costume), but I would prefer that be settled in a CRT
That seems fine to me as well.From my POV this looks like an honest misinterpretation so I think a warning should suffice here. If this happens again, the topic ban should be extended, but it doesn't seem right to do that over what seems like a genuine mistake
A few of these, I wouldn't consider noteworthy enough to take action on. As I've noted before, making fallacies is not report-worthy by itself. Also, while I don't believe he is correct in his accusations regarding the motives of his debate opponents, it would be inappropriate to enforce punishments on claims of genuine opinions. We've set the precedent in the past that, even if they may be incorrect or taken poorly, users should not be punished for making claims about reality that they legitimately believe are true (unless the claims in question are manifestly ignorant and/or offensive).
That being said, there is a evident pattern of hostile conduct here - a pattern that negatively impacts the threads he interacts with - which we had ought not to look over. I would like to suggest that DekuGlazer is given an instructional warning regarding his behaviour in threads in the future.
Both of these solutions also seem fine to me.To expand on this, I've been able to get in touch with SparxGaming12 regarding the ban appeal request.
To offer my take on the situation - I believe lifting the ban is justified. I would recommend keeping an eye on him in the time after he returns, but I'd be comfortable saying he's capable of being a productive member of the community.
So should I lift HorrorHistory's brief wiki ban or apply it here as well?oh sorry about that. I'm kinda new to vsbwiki and didn't know about the crt thing
I had thought he was warned beforehand, which is why I supported a small ban. But that doesn't seem the case, so I'd support the unban.So should I lift HorrorHistory's brief wiki ban or apply it here as well?
User contributions for HorrorHistory | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
Reduce it to 1 week imo
Irrelevant but wasn't this character deleted due to the scandal of his author?
It was another character that was deletedIrrelevant but wasn't this character deleted due to the scandal of his author?
I'm 99% sure that Uuber1 is a sockpuppet of Pizzabox492.
Uuber1 joined July 8th, just a few days after Pizzabox's last sockpuppet, FanFav12, was banned on June 30th.
I've been noticing these similarities between the two users:
I can provide more examples if asked, but I think you get the point.
- Spams Undertale Versus Threads (Especially Sans vs DBS Characters)
- And to a lesser extent, seems focused on Asriel as well.
- Has an interest in Mario.
- Constantly brings up Reddit "debunks" of Persona/SMT ratings, and keeps bringing up some guy named Bunkerman.
BumpYou've made 3 Sans vs DBS threads within days of each other.
By themselves, they obviously wouldn't mean anything, but I'm saying you two have very similar interests, make the same threads, and you coincidentally joined the wiki shortly after Pizzabox was banned.
In addition, you both seem to have an interest in Sonic as well.
That's a lie, you made the thread with MT in mind.
If we scroll up, here's you saying it yourself:
You specifically bring him up for MT, and not for any other verses, but alright.
So to reiterate, I'm suspecting you're a sock because:
I won't respond to you anymore as to not clog up the thread, but I will respond if mods need anymore clarification/examples.
- You joined the forum like a week after Pizzabox was banned.
- You both share very similar interests, those being Undertale, Mario, Sonic, DB, and MT.
- You also make the same threads for some of these verses in particular.
- For Undertale, you both frequently make Sans vs DBS Versus Threads, and Asriel Versus Threads.
- Whenever either of you bring up MT, it's pretty much always an attempt to "debunk" MT's ratings using arguments from Reddit/Bunkerman.
I remember the author of Dr. Bright being basically accused of some pretty heavy stuff. If Jack Bright is someone different then sorry for my confusion. This is what I'm referring to: .It was another character that was deleted
Was SCP-181 which was deleted, and this is derail nowI remember the author of Dr. Bright being basically accused of some pretty heavy stuff. If Jack Bright is someone different then sorry for my confusion.
I remember the author of Dr. Bright being basically accused of some pretty heavy stuff. If Jack Bright is someone different then sorry for my confusion. This is what I'm referring to: .
Having a character like that on the wiki is weird.
@Deagonx what's ur thoughts on this ?Both of these solutions also seem fine to me.
A few of these, I wouldn't consider noteworthy enough to take action on. As I've noted before, making fallacies is not report-worthy by itself. Also, while I don't believe he is correct in his accusations regarding the motives of his debate opponents, it would be inappropriate to enforce punishments on claims of genuine opinions. We've set the precedent in the past that, even if they may be incorrect or taken poorly, users should not be punished for making claims about reality that they legitimately believe are true (unless the claims in question are manifestly ignorant and/or offensive).
That being said, there is a evident pattern of hostile conduct here - a pattern that negatively impacts the threads he interacts with - which we had ought not to look over. I would like to suggest that DekuGlazer is given an instructional warning regarding his behaviour in threads in the future.
I implore any staff members who haven't already given their input here to do so. These reports have been hanging for a long time now.To expand on this, I've been able to get in touch with SparxGaming12 regarding the ban appeal request.
To offer my take on the situation - I believe lifting the ban is justified. I would recommend keeping an eye on him in the time after he returns, but I'd be comfortable saying he's capable of being a productive member of the community.
I can agree with this.A few of these, I wouldn't consider noteworthy enough to take action on. As I've noted before, making fallacies is not report-worthy by itself. Also, while I don't believe he is correct in his accusations regarding the motives of his debate opponents, it would be inappropriate to enforce punishments on claims of genuine opinions. We've set the precedent in the past that, even if they may be incorrect or taken poorly, users should not be punished for making claims about reality that they legitimately believe are true (unless the claims in question are manifestly ignorant and/or offensive).
That being said, there is a evident pattern of hostile conduct here - a pattern that negatively impacts the threads he interacts with - which we had ought not to look over. I would like to suggest that DekuGlazer is given an instructional warning regarding his behaviour in threads in the future.
I guess it's fine if others think so to.To expand on this, I've been able to get in touch with SparxGaming12 regarding the ban appeal request.
To offer my take on the situation - I believe lifting the ban is justified. I would recommend keeping an eye on him in the time after he returns, but I'd be comfortable saying he's capable of being a productive member of the community.
Till nowI guess it's fine if others think so to.
Yes, as I keep telling our members, and many of them keep ignoring, you need to bookmark the following page as well in order to efficiently keep track of all discussions that you follow.Usually if the latest post in a thread is deleted, that may cause you to stop getting notifications from it.
Till now
you ,
@DarkDragonMedeus ,@DarkGrath , @Qawsedf234, @Antvasima ( I think )
Have agreed on lifting ban, is this enough or it need more?
That should be enough, yes. I will handle it.That should be enough input. I cannot personally lift the ban, but if any admins involved in this thread are able to do so, that would be appreciated.
Yes, and I also usually if it's been a while and I wasn't notified of this thread, I unfollow and then refollow to fix the glitch.For some ******* reason this thread regularly removes itself from my following list. It is the only thread that does this.
Wait, just give me a moment let me ask him to see this post if this is his account or not.@TWILIGHT-OP
What is their Fandom wiki username? I cannot find an account there with an exactly corresponding one.
User contributions for SparxGaming12 | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
He confirmed it's his accountUser contributions for SparxGaming12 | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
It's a reoccurring character from a series of music videos, not the celebrity herself. She's never actually referred to as Spears and we have no reason to believe it's actually her.Not a rule violation, but more of a want for clarification. Are celebrities allowed to be indexed/debated on the wiki?: https://vsbattles.com/threads/brittney-spears-vs-the-terminator.159875/unread
This makes @DarkGrath and @LordGriffin1000 favorable to thatI can agree with this.
My mistake.I don't know why my last post here was deleted, because DarkGrath's post is about the ban lift while I'm not talking about the same thing. Can it be restored somehow?