Fallacies are not report-worthy on their own. However, depending on the context, frequently making fallacies can be indicative of report-worthy behaviour - for example, hostilities, stonewalling, and disruptive/inconducive conduct in discussions can be a product of intentional or unintentional fallacies. If someone is being reported for making fallacies, the important question is whether the act is contributing to something that is report-worthy, not whether the fallacy itself was made in the first place.
Which ties into all this.
Some of the comments you have listed are legitimate concerns. Spite threads like the one made by NotoriouSoda, while not anything severe in isolation, are report-worthy and warrant a warning if done repeatedly. I also do not condone the comments by First_Witch, Deceived3596, and XxZetsuxSX, which only served to needlessly add fuel to the fire that has been Tokyo Revengers threads. None of these are serious offenses, but it would not be appropriate or fair for the staff to condone these comments when very similar comments have led to warnings in past circumstances.
That being said, the majority of this is not anything substantial. I can see that you are upset with these people, but claims about a person being correct/incorrect with particular comments adds nothing to a report on its own, and this is what most of these links amount to - claims that a person said something which was incorrect. Frustrations over disagreements with particular topics of discussion, claims that someone is not being logical, calling someone biased (or claiming they falsely called someone else biased), and other notions of that sort are not bases for a reporting someone else.
I would rather leave this with a few instructional warnings for the aforementioned users and move on.
