To also quote Saikou: https://vsbattles.com/threads/revision-another-scp-big.143846/#post-5491218
While you're right about it not scaling to anyone, that's not the main point here. And yes I did ask about it if you go to the smurf tier lists.
Considering Human psychology, they will search for it.
See, this might be my internet lizard brain attempting to find something where there isn't anything, but when you tack that line onto a comment apologizing for a situation which you very clearly wanted to draw attention to originally, I'm inclined to not take said comment in good faith.
Well at least I actually took the effort to apologize for something bad that I have done unlike some people I’ve seen.
OH NEWS FLASH
A bit of both actually. For one, I have just witnessed the most traumatizing shit known to man and I felt like a horrible looking at it but I wasn’t sure how to express it and what made It worse is that some people decided to paint me as even worse than I was before even if I hated looking at myself. So then I decided that I didn’t like the person that I’ve become and that I felt like I was gonna be even worse than before
Ok? He just says that it isn’t connected other canons. This doesn't refute what I said about the tier remaining Low 1-C.
Why would you ask the top 10 non-smurfs thread and not the SCP discussion thread where all the actually knowledgeable people are?
Damn, that's pretty sad.
A fair criticism. However, I personally do not know you. I have not looked at your history, as discounting causes where the legacy behavior of a user is being reviewed, that isn't required of me. I am judging you simply in regards to this case. And what I was trying to say was that, that wording choice was a bit suspect. If that judgement was wrong, so be it. But I could not know that at the time, as again, I was judging you on the merit of this case alone.
Then I would personally recommend just taking a break. VSBW and the internet in general is infamous for almost never helping stress, anxiety and other such issues. It's not exactly the most mature and sensitive place. It's just the nature of the beast. And I definitely recommend disengaging with it for a few hours rather than continuing to get worked up about it.
That be rough. But I still wouldn't recommend or even agree with the action of going off on this forum. If you're feeling this way, talk to a family member, a close personal friend, etc. Maybe contact a therapist. This though? This ain't a good place for it.
There was no IP overlap when I just checked.
I will send you a message with some hopefully useful advice to help you out.
Transcending had approached the HR group to appeal against his ban. So I am going to present some information regarding this.
I'd like to hear @Mr._Bambu 's thoughts on this one, as he's been involved with cases handling the guy before.
I want to clarify just slightly, it was a group chat. I got a friend request from an account I had no mutual friends or servers with, and when I accepted I was immediately put into a group chat with Beyond_Transcending, who I have blocked, where he was sort of all-caps raging at me for the ban, several weeks after the fact. When I asked the user why he put me in that group chat he said it was because B_T asked him to.
Also if you’re trying to find a new reason to report them, shouldn’t they be allowed to defend themselves? As I think it’s pretty ridiculous to admit that the reason they were banned without being able to defend themselves was a lie, and then opt into another reason keep them banned.
I can attest to this. His calcs are just... awful. Downright awful. He's partly the reason I don't evaluate anything TR related at the moment. When their quality improves, then they can count on me to evaluate.
This is a fairly egregious mischaracterization of what the situation is, as no one lied nor is it clear what's true or not, we only know what they have claimed, and they were not solely banned for one reason, there were a variety of behaviors and violations that contributed to it. Regardless, as a regular user with no involvement or information about the situation at hand, this isn't the place to be offering your unqualified opinion.
There were already a lengthy list of reasons for why they were banned. Also, the one who got them reported was not lying; if anything I think their "Self defense" is what actually consists of lies. Provoking people wasn't the sole reason, but also constantly mass FRA trains via their friends making proxis and harassing people offsite. Deagon clarified my misunderstanding above but it still stands as another good reason to keep them banned.
Handled.
Last time he was banned for a couple of weeks so two months is good in my book.
Yet it wasn't Low 1-C when it was made?
It wasn't the intention of asking, no, more so the addition of the character in question.
The CRT was already made, just not by me.
First of all, I know the accusation that they intentionally trigger people wasn’t true because I was actually sent screenshots of the conversation. And in that conversation they were talking about why emotional intelligence matters in debating and that some people argue to exploit other peoples emotions. They never claimed they did so.
