Yeah "dox" is probably too strong a word, he found an account with the same username on a PS2 emulator forum from like, 15 years ago, that I only commented with once, to find my birthday and use it to harass me over my perceived age. Which I still think is incredibly creepy and also extremely bad behavior.
Good grief. Dread. I do not understand why you are continuing to comment here and insert yourself in a situation you are not a part of. Do you just monitor the RVR until you see something you want to debate about? That's not what this is for, and this is not the first time you've done this. I genuinely think a thread ban is worth considering until there is a situation where your input is actually pertinent.
This tells me that you're missing the point. It isn't about whether the question is legitimate. You aren't involved in the situation, so abstain from commenting and let the staff discuss it, and they can ask the questions, and only regular users who are involved in the situation at hand should be speaking about it.
I am not antagonizing you, nor did I antagonize others. You are regularly breaking the rules here by playing quasi-mod and inserting yourself into RVR cases you aren't involved in. Unwatch the thread, don't come here unless you're actually a part of it.
I was more so just sharing what Deagon shared me, I suppose it's not "Harassment" per say. But coming to thread just because his friends asked him to FRA train instead of doing things on his own volition is iff even if not quite rvr worthy.
I presume that this matter has already undergone evaluation and resolution. Attached herewith is the related post. Therefore, it would be inequitable to reiterate the issue, as it has already been addressed, although I initially inquired about its background due to its potential misunderstanding or rather punishing the person with the same reason.
It was evaluated with regard to the Transcendings, but the thread became a giant mess due to their incessant arguing that they'd done nothing wrong despite concrete undeniable evidence (another reason why they should stay banned -- they never admitted wrongdoing at all). It's not inappropriate to bring it up again if one of the perpetrators escaped an appropriate punishment for it due to the thread becoming too messy for staff to properly evaluate.
The evidence that’s supposed to prove this hasn’t been provided yet tho? We’re still waiting on Medeus to show statements of the two Transcendings contradicting themselves because the conversation itself doesn’t express such a thing. Unless you think the conversation does can you highlight where?
You don't have to send SS (it fills the page more than what is necessary), you can link profile which got vandalised.
I blocked them.
Sorry for interrupting but I'm pretty sure that they just want to be a mod or feel like they are one, which IMO doesn't seem that harmful, especially as their words do hold some water even if they're not exactly relevant to the conversation their self.
When we found the profiles open, we had already decided with our friends that it would be nothing to be banned for this honorable mission.
Well now, you probably got what you wanted. But if you wanted to be banned, you could've just requested it privately.
I thought I had, whoops.
Well, there is a big difference between simply talking negatively behind someone's back and plotting a conspiracy against someone or a group behind closed doors. But anyway, after looking at his scans more thoroughly, I suppose I don't see the strongest proposals to include you, but as for the Transcendings, I still agree with Bambu. They were still bringing up Antvasima's "Emotional stability" and the scan of the conversation they still were talking in a confident attitude to make use of vote manipulation to get him triggered and "Possibly start making worse arguments."
Yes they brought up Ants emotional instability however they were using Ant as an example for why emotional intelligence matters in debating. Let me read out their conversation for you.
Well that’s sketchy as hell. You’re telling me some random person gave you “evidence” but didn’t want the evidence shared? Why? What’s the point in evidence that you’re not going to share? How is anyone supposed to trust and know this evidence even exist if the other party is refusing to share it? The only reason I can think of for why someone wouldn’t want to share their evidence is because they either don’t actually have any evidence, or because their evidence is weak and doesn’t actually support what they claim.
First of all, let me be specific. They didn't tell me, they told Deagonx, and Deagonx shared it with me, Antvasima, AKM_Sama, Firestorm, and Mr._Bambu. Also, I didn't see the specific scans of them actively commiting harassment, but a simple detail that they are infamous for having shady intentions and harass anyone who tries to "Leak their dark secrets".
Apologize for the unnecessary interruption, but there have been cases where heckling members of the forum/wiki off-site can be punishable on-site.
