- 5,460
- 2,303
All celestials we see are M bodies minus probably the ones who stand with M bodies of the abstracts.no, I mean the first Thor vs Exitar in 90s (Thor attacked a weak point and it was an M Body of Exitar tho)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All celestials we see are M bodies minus probably the ones who stand with M bodies of the abstracts.no, I mean the first Thor vs Exitar in 90s (Thor attacked a weak point and it was an M Body of Exitar tho)
Please reread my previous post above, as I updated it.Well, as said, I'm specifically avoiding that. Without more context, we are to assume "universe" refers to the Earth Dimension, which is just Low 2-C. Universe-affecting feats will only be Low 1-A if it's made explicit that the Abstracts are being affected.
I also don't know of many instances where the Abstracts are threatened by run-of-the-mill superheroes and villains, also. If those examples exist, then they're either outliers or the heroes are somehow amped. The cosmics have always been very much above the regular denizens of Earth-616 in the pecking order.
Ok, so that upgrades Doom's maximum prep/technology/absorption to High 1-B/Low 1-A.Should be yes
Your update seemed to have been just a conclusion, and not a line of reasoning in and of itself, so, there really is nothing to respond to.Please reread my previous post above, as I updated it.
However, what is the harm in considering what you refer to in such massive contexts as Low 1-A or 1-A as being larger sections of the multiverse instead of universes? It seems like a much more logical fit that avoids confusion and massive contradictions.
It seems to contradict Marvel Comics' own most explicit explanations for the scale of its individual universes, which is what we currently use for our scaling, and is much more explicit/reliable than personal speculation by fitting together many different writers that usually have no idea of what the others have established.Your update seemed to have been just a conclusion, and not a line of reasoning in and of itself, so, there really is nothing to respond to.
The harm, also, is that the High 1-B statements all scale back to the Universal Abstracts in some way or another (Slorioth and the Cosmic Cubes are below Universal Eternity for instance). And from what I see there are no confusions or contradictions. I've already addressed all the potential inconsistencies.
Eternity is 616 universe which contains infinite other regular universes within itself. Nothing is contradicted.It seems to contradict Marvel Comics' own most explicit explanations for the scale of its individual universes, which is what we currently use for our scaling, and is much more explicit/reliable than personal speculation by fitting together many different writers that usually have no idea of what the others have established.
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/File:DoctorStrangeEvidence1.jpg
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/File:DoctorStrangeEvidence2.jpg
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/File:DoctorStrangeEvidence3.jpg
I already addressed this:It seems to contradict Marvel Comics' own most explicit explanations for the scale of its individual universes, which is what we currently use for our scaling, and is much more explicit/reliable than personal speculation by fitting together many different writers.
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/File:DoctorStrangeEvidence1.jpg
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/File:DoctorStrangeEvidence2.jpg
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/File:DoctorStrangeEvidence3.jpg
One possible counterargument one might try to use is to be found in these scans, which state that man's universe has only 3 spatial dimensions and lists other realms with varying dimensionalities as universes apart from it. However, it should be noted that they are not necessarily talking about the earth dimension and the realms adjacent to it as being in the domains of separate Eternities, since, as you can see, it lists Nightmare's Realm, Asgard and the Dark Dimension among these different universes, even though it is well-established that they are all inside of Eternity. And that's of course not to mention the fact that Eternity's whole domain having only 3 spatial dimensions is very inconsistent, so the above interpretation is undoubtedly the more correct one either way.
They certainly vary in power, but not by like, that much, I don't think. For example if one M-Body of Eternity holds the universe as a thought/dream of his, I'd certainly expect others to do the same, even if they're weaker in their own level of existence.Do we know that all M-Bodies are created equally?
But that is the textbook definition of a multiverse or a section of a multiverse as far as I am aware, so it would be a larger part of the full multiversal Eternity than just the universal cell within him. We cannot assume that anybody who fights against an abstract entity automatically contends aganst the Low 1-A version.Eternity is 616 universe which contains infinite other regular universes within itself. Nothing is contradicted.
Universes = low 2-C
Eternity = Low 1-A
Okay then, but I still stand by the perspective in my last preceding posts regarding the meaning of the words universe and multiverse, and also much prefer if DontTalk evaluates if all of your claims here seem valid, mathematically or otherwise.I already addressed this:
I might note, also:
Quasar Vol. 1 #27 - June 11, 1991
Children of the Voyager #4 - October 5, 1993
Secret Defenders Vol. 1 #25 - January 10, 1995
Ghost Rider 2099 Vol. 1 #25 - March 14, 1996
The majority of the comics i'm using were released in a timespan of only 5 years, which is pretty short in comicbook time. For comparison's sake: It's like if I used scans from a 2023 comic alongside scans from a 2018 comic.
It isn't, no. As shown in the OP, a 'reality' in Marvel isn't just a singular universe, but also all the dimensions associated with that universe. So Earth-616 contains not just the Earth Dimension, but all the other weird magical dimensions that are indeed other planes of existence but don't technically count as separate Earths.But that is the textbook definition of a multiverse or a section of a multiverse as far as I am aware
No,But that is the textbook definition of a multiverse or a section of a multiverse as far as I am aware, so it would be a larger part of the full multiversal Eternity than just the universal cell within him. We cannot assume that anybody who fights against an abstract entity automatically contends aganst the Low 1-A version.
They were created by Mark Gurenwald to explain away how abstract entities can be defeated by much lower beings, and explicitly get very different degrees of power afforded to them via the Dimension of Manifestations, if I remember correctly.I also have a question.
Do we know that all M-Bodies from a singular source (i.e, Eternity) are created equally?
It might solve some issues if they aren't.
...would that not explain away any contradiction based on people fighting abstracts then????They were created by Mark Gurenwald to explain away how abstract entities can be defeated by much lower beings, and explocitly get very different degrees of power afforded to them via the Dimension of Manifestations, if I remember correctly.
Agreed.Maybe we should make a list of who scales to each new tier.
... Thaaat should be placed in the Marvel Comics Discussion Thread.Also upgrade Monica Rambeau. In the new issue she collapsed a universe with here mere presence in a short time-frame. That seems multi-galaxy level at least in power.
And are you making any strict distinctions and rules to distinguish between when a local universe (Low 2-C) and a whole numbered (Earth-564, for example) large segment of the multiverse (Low 1-A?) is involved for scaling and when which degree of an abstract entity is involved? This can easily turn extremely diffuse and confusing for future scaling otherwise, with almost everybody automatically gaining extremely bloated tiers, as in infinite degrees of infinity higher than they have ever actually demonstrated.It isn't, no. As shown in the OP, a 'reality' in Marvel isn't just a singular universe, but also all the dimensions associated with that universe. So Earth-616 contains not just the Earth Dimension, but all the other weird magical dimensions that are indeed other planes of existence but don't technically count as separate Earths.
I mean, we already see that Eternity contains more than just the Earth Dimension in several instances. That should be just a no-brainer.
A 3-A to Low 2-C Spectrum seems reasonable if she has feat of that scale, yes, but it is derailing, and this is a staff forum thread.Also upgrade Monica Rambeau. In the new issue she collapsed a universe with here mere presence in a short time-frame. That seems multi-galaxy level at least in power.
Calling back to this: I'd also very much prefer if you refrained from giving uninformed input on this discussion. I think it's clear you haven't really read the original post at all, and that's understandable (It's a little big, after all), but that being the case, you should just not unnecessarily clutter the thread with reiterations of already-debunked points.and also much prefer if DontTalk evaluates if all of your claims here seem valid, mathematically or otherwise.
Off the top of my head:Maybe we should make a list of who scales to each new tier.
Mostly share the same thoughts for how little I know of Marvel.Neutral on the Skyfather stuff. But I'm pretty sure we can just not remotely scale them at all considering Galactus' fight with Mephisto (who has as many statements about being Skyfather level) and the combined Skyfathers getting stomped by Celestials, who are typically presented as below M-Bodies by a significant degree.
Anyway, I sort of agree with this, but I lean more towards much more towards neutral because I'm not entirely comfortable with Universal Eternities transcending subspace.
It's worth noting that a Skrull's space-time warp is stated to pass through infinite dimensions (in an obviously spatio-temporal context) in order to get from point a to b. This isn't an argument, just more infinite-d stuff.
Would well-fed Galactus and Uatu be Low 1-A? I mean, Galactus did fight Agamotto.Off the top of my head:
Eternity, Infinity, Death, Oblivion, Lord Chaos and Master Order = Low 1-A
Dormammu = Low 1-A (Way, way weaker than Eternity, but can still hold his own against him in a fight and is on the same general scope of power)
Cosmic Cubes = Variable between High 1-B and Low 1-A
Phoenix Force and her Avatars = Variable between Low 1-A (Girauld cauterized a wound in Eternity's substance and made him feel pain in doing so)
Also, to my knowledge, we currently rate Odin as variable from 3-C to 2-A, the former rating being what we use to account for the times where he's depicted as generally comparable to Thor (Albeit still superior), so, that's already something that proves to be no issue to us.Thor regularly fights skyfathers, the Hulkmregularly fights Thor, the Thing regularly fights Hulk, the Rhino and Sandman fought the Thing quite regularly, and Spider-Man fights Rhino and Sandman regularly for example. Should all of them suddenly get tier Low 1-A now? I don't think that even Marvel Comics is intended to be so extremely inconsistent on a very regular basis.
I have helped to build and keep this community working properly for the past 9 years, and handle most of the wiki patrolling work on my own every single day. I have very limited time available.Calling back to this: I'd also very much prefer if you refrained from giving uninformed input on this discussion. I think it's clear you haven't really read the original post at all, and that's understandable (It's a little big, after all), but that being the case, you should just not unnecessarily clutter the thread with reiterations of already-debunked points.
Well, giving Odin a variable tier between 3-C and Low 1-A depending on the story seems a bit on the extreme side, yes? We might as well throw our hands up in the air and just give all characters variable tiers between their lowest lows and highest peaks, and I much prefer if we scale them from consistent portrayals rather than the greatest extremes in either direction.Also, to my knowledge, we currently rate Odin as variable from 3-C to 2-A, the former rating being what we use to account for the times where he's depicted as generally comparable to Thor (Albeit still superior), so, that's already something that proves to be no issue to us.
All-in-all: The cases you are talking about will be deemed inconsistencies regardless of what tier the Abstracts (and those who scale to them) are at, as long as we rate them higher than the heroes at all (Which we always will). So the bulk of what you say can be pretty easily dismissed as outliers (Provided they even happened in the first place)
To add some input as well, even universes that don't exist anymore (they say nigh-infinite due to faulty logic) due to the Ultimate Nullifier of all things are still part of Eternity's totality, despite all of the other Abstracts getting erased.It isn't, no. As shown in the OP, a 'reality' in Marvel isn't just a singular universe, but also all the dimensions associated with that universe. So Earth-616 contains not just the Earth Dimension, but all the other weird magical dimensions that are indeed other planes of existence but don't technically count as separate Earths.
I mean, we already see that Eternity contains more than just the Earth Dimension in several instances. That should be just a no-brainer.
Odin won't be low 1-A as far as i understood the scaling chain.Well, giving Odin a variable tier between 3-C and Low 1-A depending on the story seems a bit on the extreme side, yes? We might as well throw our hands up in the air and just give all characters variable tiers between their lowest lows and highest peaks, and I much prefer if we scale them from consistent portrayals rather than the greatest extremes in either direction.
If your time avaliable is limited, then simply don't respond until you have enough time to read through the whole of my arguments. I did indeed try to discuss these matters with you private, also, but ultimately that wouldn't really have gone anywhere, and whether it's debated publicly or in private makes no difference, in the end. I apologize if I come across as conceited, but your insistence to input even while ignorant of what the arguments are is really irritating.I have helped to build and keep this community working properly for the past 9 years, and handle most of the wiki patrolling work on my own every single day. I have very limited time available.
The Celestials would be High 1-B from scaling above Odin, most likely. They definitely don't scale to Eternity under usual circumstances, seeing as they're explicitly part of his thoughts, just like other denizens of Earth-616 are.Would well-fed Galactus and Uatu be Low 1-A? I mean, Galactus did fight Agamotto.
And while Dormammu did lose to Eternity, this was in his weakest state and Strange said that Dormammu and Eternity could've both died in the fight.
His Base also scales above the entire Celestial Avatar race (not sure what they'd be) and above the Goddess, who was >> 30 cosmic cubes due to the cosmic egg.
He also stomped and one-shot the Low 1-A Giraud, and scales to being capable of destroying the Dark Dimension, something which he has tried doing repeatedly (mostly to take Dr. Strange with it).
Well, "Variable. 3-C to High 1-B" isn't really much better.Odin won't be low 1-A as far as i understood the scaling chain.
Anyway, as I said, I really have to go to perform my regular wiki patrolling work now, as I still need to sleep properly. I would appreciate if there are only at most a few dozen more posts here when I return, not 500. Also, wait for DontTalk everybody. He needs to check the fundamental theoretical structure here.
True, but they were relatively even for most of the fight.Dormammu and Eternity being potentially capable of killing each other is also contradicted in a fair bit of instances. For example, Eternity was fine after the battle, and his ensuing bout of unconsciousness was treated as being overall a very trivial thing to him.
Would be better if we scale M body celestials to 2-A and true forms to High 1-B?If your time avaliable is limited, then simply don't respond until you have enough time to read through the whole of my arguments. I did indeed discuss these matters with you private, also, but ultimately that wouldn't really have gone anywhere, and whether it's debated publicly or in private makes no difference, in the end. I apologize if I come across as conceited, but your insistence to input even while ignorant of what the arguments are is very irritant.
The Celestials would be High 1-B from scaling above Odin, most likely. They definitely don't scale to Eternity under usual circumstances, seeing as they're explicitly part of his thoughts, just like other denizens of Earth-616 are.
Dormammu and Eternity being potentially capable of killing each other is also contradicted in a fair bit of instances. For example, Eternity was fine after the battle, and his ensuing bout of unconsciousness was treated as being overall a very trivial thing to him. Later on, Umar also commented that Dormammu "took a leave of his senses" when he challenged Eternity.
Though, as pointed out above, the variable power scale of M-Bodies is a potential solution to whatever issues arise.
Do you have any plans to upgrade DC?Those guys will be left for Part 2 of this thread. Scaling the Omniversal Abstracts is... A whole other can of worms, to say the least. Glad someone else has been working on the more recent Marvel stuff, though.
Oh, Dormammu absolutely does scale to Low 1-A. He's just not quite equal to Eternity.True, but they were relatively even for most of the fight.
Plus Dormammu has other Low 1-A stuff like stomping Giraud and being superior to someone vastly above 30 Cosmic Cubes (which apparently will scale up to Low 1-A).