The_Legendary_Vin
They/Them- 1,239
- 612
Bulma only mentioned being on the edge of the universe in the manga, a visual was not given
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
......Don't draw them at all /J
first successful buff in a while?
Aren’t the end points of Universes 6 and 7 visibly shown :V
Don't draw them at all /J
Infinite speed shipsThere’s also Sorbet calculating the Frieza Force would be able to conquer 70% of the universe
There’s also Sorbet calculating the Frieza Force would be able to conquer 70% of the universe
2 saying that the stars are infinitely expanding (3-A) and 2 calling space infinite (High 3-A)
Heh, jokes aside, we consider the moon cell to be infinite despite sefar taking off with 90% of it's data. (There’s also Sorbet calculating the Frieza Force would be able to conquer 70% of the universe
Heh, jokes aside, we consider the moon cell to be infinite despite sefar taking off with 90% of it's data. (And ignore two statements that just say that moon cell isn't infinite)
Moon Cells is belong to fate verse. Also fate have High 3-A earth's "surface"
Well earth surface mean its texture and layer, the outer layer is where human live, stated to be infinite in size.1-C you mean
Anyway, derailing now.Well earth surface mean its texture and layer, the outer layer is where human live, stated to be infinite in size.
1-C is from the Moon, the core of the Moon held Moon Cells, which is a supercomputerwhich some how even larger than Earth
I found them.
As you can see there are 4 total statements. 2 saying that the stars are infinitely expanding (3-A) and 2 calling space infinite (High 3-A)
Quick question, would koyama's statements be accepted as valid ones?[for toie and non canon db]Honestly, I wouldn't be against High 3-A if those statements can be accepted as valid secondary sources, given that Daizenshuu's statements have been accepted on a case by case basis before.
Tbh, infinite speed should be dealt on it's own [since it's rather an eh topic]. We should mainly focus on the size and AP since they are not that controversial.It isn't just High 3-A statistics that may follow from this, it is mainly about infinite speed for certain characters.
I agree with this.Tbh, infinite speed should be dealt on it's own [since it's rather an eh topic]. We should mainly focus on the size and AP since they are not that controversial.
I was confident in taking my chances with infinitely big universe, but damn, infinite speed is a whole another can of worms. Unless we ignore all that later anti feats that show finite speeds i doubt it would come to pass.So who will be responsible on making the thread? I can make one if no one is against that, unless someone is already on planing on it.
I share similar thoughts to Elizhaa. If the statements are considered canon (which I believe they are), then this should be fine. The statements themselves seem rather direct to me.@AKM sama @Confluctor @DarkDragonMedeus @Elizhaa @SamanPatou @DemonGodMitchAubin @UchihaSlayer96 @Theglassman12 @LordGriffin1000 @Starter_Pack @Therefir @KLOL506 @Hop_Hoppington-Hoppenhiemer
What do you think about this? It seems to make sense to me.
I agree , infinite speed deserves it's own thread and what not.I was confident in taking my chances with infinitely big universe, but damn, infinite speed is a whole another can of worms. Unless we ignore all that later anti feats that show finite speeds i doubt it would come to pass.
Don't take koyama, the broly wanker's, word seriously.Quick question, would koyama's statements be accepted as valid ones?[for toie and non canon db]
And we generally do accept daizenshu [such as statements that supports higher ki= higher stats, ki control, and we even use one of it to support/validate vegeta' planet level rating]
But Damage has a thread planned for Dragon Ball speed as a whole, so best to wait for that before we continue with infinite speed. For now, we should focus merely on the size.
Something something people still take issue with 2-C Dragon Ballbut I actually realized traveling to other universes is via dimensional travel and not really a speed feat.
Usually that'd be the case if there is no indication of dodging the attack or reacting to it. But that's different in the anime because Beerus visibly reacts to the Expansion Ball thingy which is far swifter than the shockwaves themselves.And I already made comments saying I don't think High 3-A destruction feats are assumed Infinite attack speed for reasons why Low 2-C destruction feats aren't' Immeasurable attack speed feats.
This is actually incorrect. It wasn’t the source that was the problem, but the person who translated it. The original kanji (銀河 | Ginga) doesn’t differentiate "galaxy" and "galaxies". So in actuality it was originally written as "North, East, South, and West Galaxies".especially since one of the scans justifying High 3-A stuff is referencing the infamous "4 Galaxies as opposed to 4 quadrants" shenanigans.
Damn, so the whole 4 Galaxies thing was just a bunch of bullshit?This is actually incorrect. It wasn’t the source that was the problem, but the person who translated it. The original kanji (銀河 | Ginga) doesn’t differentiate "galaxy" and "galaxies". So in actuality it was originally written as "North, East, South, and West Galaxies".
The raws of daizanshuu 4 even call them directions as opposed to galaxy.