• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Question about dragon ball universe size

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aren’t the end points of Universes 6 and 7 visibly shown :V


AABF1879-DFE7-403C-B7E7-4AF1425D4E69.jpg
Nah bro DBS is galaxy level since the universes are shown to only contain a galaxy.
 
I agree on both...or to be more precise, on all versions of DB.
The only two counter arguments are "It was stated to have an edge/center". And infinities can have edges and centers, so it doesn't work. And "We see it as finite" artist choice, unless someone here wants to say that the animators should draw infinite sized universes.
 
It isn't just High 3-A statistics that may follow from this, it is mainly about infinite speed for certain characters.
 
Honestly, I wouldn't be against High 3-A if those statements can be accepted as valid secondary sources, given that Daizenshuu's statements have been accepted on a case by case basis before.
Quick question, would koyama's statements be accepted as valid ones?[for toie and non canon db]
And we generally do accept daizenshu [such as statements that supports higher ki= higher stats, ki control, and we even use one of it to support/validate vegeta' planet level rating]
 
So who will be responsible on making the thread? I can make one if no one is against that, unless someone is already on planing on it.
 
So who will be responsible on making the thread? I can make one if no one is against that, unless someone is already on planing on it.
I was confident in taking my chances with infinitely big universe, but damn, infinite speed is a whole another can of worms. Unless we ignore all that later anti feats that show finite speeds i doubt it would come to pass.
 
I was confident in taking my chances with infinitely big universe, but damn, infinite speed is a whole another can of worms. Unless we ignore all that later anti feats that show finite speeds i doubt it would come to pass.
I agree , infinite speed deserves it's own thread and what not.
 
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/872806540162265139/885787770902159360/image0.png

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/872806540162265139/885787774945493032/image0.png

https://preview.redd.it/6p8wwuc9ql8...bp&s=e5b1265074012fa7b6f6b2e07453d1ef81c1a012

"A land of heavens that transcends dimensions"

"A supernatural realm ruled by the gods. Higher then the sky, it is a dimensionally transcedental heavenly country that cannot be percieved from human realm. From this land gods look down upon the entire world."

https://comicvine1.cbsistatic.com/uploads/original/11128/111288220/7651657-6122831992-76515.png

It is truly another reality that isn't connected to ours except on the most metaphysical level.

It is an entirely seperate universe that encompasses another level of reality

Outerversal dragon ball lessgo.
 
I am of the same mindset as Elizhaa.

As for speed, I'm of the opinion that Beerus downscaling from Whis's universe-traversing feat would still be Infinite, since infinity divided is still infinity.

But Damage has a thread planned for Dragon Ball speed as a whole, so best to wait for that before we continue with infinite speed. For now, we should focus merely on the size.
 
Quick question, would koyama's statements be accepted as valid ones?[for toie and non canon db]
And we generally do accept daizenshu [such as statements that supports higher ki= higher stats, ki control, and we even use one of it to support/validate vegeta' planet level rating]
Don't take koyama, the broly wanker's, word seriously.
 
But Damage has a thread planned for Dragon Ball speed as a whole, so best to wait for that before we continue with infinite speed. For now, we should focus merely on the size.

I have two in mind for that, but one of those is no longer necessary since the shockwaves CRT was rejected for the DBS manga.

My other speed CRT likely won't affect this.
 
High Universal range, and High 3-A AP for SSG scaling I honestly do not mind. And traveling from King Kai's planet to Earth is simply Massively FTL+; but I actually realized traveling to other universes is via dimensional travel and not really a speed feat. And I already made comments saying I don't think High 3-A destruction feats are assumed Infinite attack speed for reasons why Low 2-C destruction feats aren't' Immeasurable attack speed feats.

But I'm also positive AKM Sama is most likely against all this; especially since one of the scans justifying High 3-A stuff is referencing the infamous "4 Galaxies as opposed to 4 quadrants" shenanigans.
 
but I actually realized traveling to other universes is via dimensional travel and not really a speed feat.
Something something people still take issue with 2-C Dragon Ball

And I already made comments saying I don't think High 3-A destruction feats are assumed Infinite attack speed for reasons why Low 2-C destruction feats aren't' Immeasurable attack speed feats.
Usually that'd be the case if there is no indication of dodging the attack or reacting to it. But that's different in the anime because Beerus visibly reacts to the Expansion Ball thingy which is far swifter than the shockwaves themselves.
 
especially since one of the scans justifying High 3-A stuff is referencing the infamous "4 Galaxies as opposed to 4 quadrants" shenanigans.
This is actually incorrect. It wasn’t the source that was the problem, but the person who translated it. The original kanji (銀河 | Ginga) doesn’t differentiate "galaxy" and "galaxies". So in actuality it was originally written as "North, East, South, and West Galaxies".

The raws of daizanshuu 4 even call them directions as opposed to galaxy.
 
This is actually incorrect. It wasn’t the source that was the problem, but the person who translated it. The original kanji (銀河 | Ginga) doesn’t differentiate "galaxy" and "galaxies". So in actuality it was originally written as "North, East, South, and West Galaxies".

The raws of daizanshuu 4 even call them directions as opposed to galaxy.
Damn, so the whole 4 Galaxies thing was just a bunch of bullshit?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top