• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Profile Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

I'd like to clarify why Conker's links led there. They were uploaded to gfycat, and recently gfycat has had a bot try to detect 18+ gifs and move them to their sister website for **** gifs. This has ended up catching a lot of evidence scans in the crossfire. So it's probably a good idea to avoid posting new scans on gfycat.

Since it wasn't really the fault of the users, pages shouldn't be deleted over stuff like that, the scans should simply be moved to other sites like imgur (like was done here).
 
They're still using it but it's essentially random which scans get hit. It would be nice to replace all gfycat links but that's a massive project and isn't completely necessary as not all scans are getting moved.
 
That seems like a reasonable suggestion to me.
 
Characters from the Child of Light verse.
They're rated as 5-C/4-C/4-A for no reason, are FTL for also no reason, and there are no scans for any of their abilities. Overall, they're pretty outdated profiles.
 
The profiles aren't great but I don't think they're so bad that they should be deleted.
 
Shmooply said:
Characters from the Child of Light verse.
They're rated as 5-C/4-C/4-A for no reason, are FTL for also no reason, and there are no scans for any of their abilities. Overall, they're pretty outdated profiles.
Click to expand...
If they do not eliminate it, you could perfectly list here, where I list franchises that are outdated or lack profiles so that something can be done with them in the future.
 
DaReaperMan said:
This page, missing several statistics is enough to say why
Click to expand...
See the source image
 
Bobsican said:
"Do not try to upgrade the cosmology or the cast to 1-B based on the statements from the Naljians or their toy. While one of the them stated that "there are only 26 dimensions that matter", there is not enough sufficient evidence to scale them to such level, as they only have one appearance and statement in the entire series, and the mentioning of dimensions doesn't automatically fit the criteria in our Tiering System for the purpose of tiering.

In addition, although the Naljian toy was stated to be more advanced than the Omnitrix, when it replicated Gwen Tennyson's form, it displayed a clear inability to copy her powers accurately, instead using pink disks to replace the energy disks. As such, it is very difficult to imagine that it can copy the powers of a Celestialsapien when it could not fully replicate the powers of a lower tier species."
I'm not too knowledgeable on the verse so I did my best based on the note we currently have on the profile, and this would fit better in the Discussion Rules on second thought.
Click to expand...
Okay, so thoughts on adding this as a Discussion Rule for Ben 10, then removing the Naljians profile?
 
It also looks like a composite profile from multiple media, going from 1950 to 2005, and the profile itself feature very little to no details on everything, and no sources whatsover.

We either delete it or someone has to rework the profile and split each different version in key/other profiles or just focus on a single media.
 
SamanPatou said:
It also looks like a composite profile from multiple media, going from 1950 to 2005, and the profile itself feature very little to no details on everything, and no sources whatsover.

We either delete it or someone has to rework the profile and split each different version in key/other profiles or just focus on a single media.
Click to expand...
I am fine with if we delete it.
 
Bobsican said:
Okay, so thoughts on adding this as a Discussion Rule for Ben 10, then removing the Naljians profile?
Click to expand...
I personally do not mind, but would prefer more staff input first.
 
Well, 10-A's not the most egregious rating to just throw around.

Then I guess just choose a continuity and either justify a rating or slap an unknown on him.
 
ApiesDeathbyLazors said:
Well, 10-A's not the most egregious rating to just throw around.

Then I guess just choose a continuity and either justify a rating or slap an unknown on him.
Click to expand...
If he becomes Unknown then the profile is too barebones to stay, I'm afraid.
Pages with more explanations than this got removed for this kind of issues.
 
Other than that, evidences and sources of everything that is claimed on that profile should be added.

Someone has to take some time to decide a specific version, either from a book, a cartoon or what, gather sources of said media and basically rebuild the profile to only revolve around what has been chosen.

Deleting him is not entirely necessary, we already have non-combat oriented characters, but someone has to work on him, otherwise deleting him is the only option left.

@HeadlessKramerGeoff777 As the person who made the profile, would you be willing to fix it?
 
He visited early yesterday according to when I just checked, so he is not completely gone.
 
It has been deleted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DivinumAeterna
Regarding the standards of Team Profiles
Replies
4
Views
554
DivinumAeterna
DivinumAeterna
Antvasima
  • Locked
Slightly adjusting our rules for bolded "powers and abilities" links
Replies
32
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Flashlight237
  • Locked
About The "Others" Section
2 3
Replies
84
Views
7K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Jinx666
'Continuity' Section for Verse Pages
Replies
37
Views
5K
Antvasima
Antvasima
DMUA
Removing Power of the Verse from Verse pages
2 3 4
Replies
147
Views
19K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top