• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Removing Power of the Verse from Verse pages

On second thought, wouldn't the easiest solution here be to simply disallow usage of subjective "this worse is very strong/weak", "this verse is somewhat strong/weak", et cetera statements within the "Power of the Verse" sections via an official instruction rule? The rest of the information within those sections does not seem to cause any harm and is likely recurrently useful for visitors who want a quick overview.
But isn't it more useful and easily applied to simply instruct our members to keep those sections updated, to avoid subjective statements, etc., meaning to allegorically renovate the house in a sensible manner, rather than tear down the entire building to build a new one?
I personally think that it is an important niché and that we should probably figure out a way to restructure the power of the verse section to turn more useful instead of deleting it
These are still my views regarding the "Power of the Verse" sections, but I think that the new "Scaling" section instructions draft seems good.

Scaling (Optional)​



  • This section should accurately explain which feats are applicable to characters and entities within the verse and how they "scale" amongst them. Examples of how to portray this could include
    • A scaling chain which lists off characters based on their relative strength to each other, e.g. (Dark Knight Accounts > PoH >= Goddess Accounts > Gabriel > EoA Kirito >>> Star King Kirito)
    • A brief excerpt of what feats apply to which characters.
    • Power or grading systems that may place characters in certain realms of power relative to each other.
    • Outliers or feats that may not be applicable to characters at current.
    • A potential list of in-verse "Tiering", with reasoning as to why characters are in each tier.
I still think that it is unnecessary and overzealous to completely get rid of all the powers and abilities sections, rather than just the bad parts of them. There is still useful information within many of them, so all of this would be lots of work for no true benefit, and I think that the information there would act as a good complement to sections explaining the scaling.
I still think that it is best to just clean up the power of the verse sections by removing "this verse is strong/weak" mentions, make them more matter of fact, and add scaling sections right underneath them.
Would it be fine if I started removing "The verse is ... strong"? Since that seems to have been widely accepted.
@AKM sama @DontTalkDT @DarkDragonMedeus @Mr. Bambu @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @Agnaa @Just_a_Random_Butler @DarkGrath @Dereck03 @Planck69

Your input would be appreciated here. 🙏
 
Not sure entirely what I said before, but I think instead of removing it outright; some ground rules about making simplified overview of the various tiers of what most characters scale from, and what it peaks are whether in the form of a god tier character and/or weapon is fine to list. As well as listing notable speed ratings and list of power and abilities. I'd rule out starting up with generic, "Very powerful verse" description or other statements that are similar or are the generic opposite description.
I already have here.
 
I don't mind removing relative descriptions like, "X is a very powerful/weak verse" from the section. The section itself is fine aside from that and I'd prefer we just have some ground rules for what is to be explained there (current tiers, some common abilities etc.).

I'm fine with the Scaling section proposed by Curry.
 
I already have here.
Thank you. I think that your evaluation seems to make sense. 🙏
I don't mind removing relative descriptions like, "X is a very powerful/weak verse" from the section. The section itself is fine aside from that and I'd prefer we just have some ground rules for what is to be explained there (current tiers, some common abilities etc.).

I'm fine with the Scaling section proposed by Curry.
Thank you. Agreed. 🙏
 
Personally, I think the power of the verse pages should stay, but we should get rid of formulations like "this verse is strong".

Generally, a properly written section could have useful information. It's often neglected because we don't do "verse vs verse" debates. There are things that don't make much sense to mention elsewhere. E.g. Death Mage mentions two universe creating gods, who are relevant for the power of the verse as a whole, but couldn't really get profiles as their abilities are otherwise entirely unknown. One could also mention such things in a cosmology page, of course, but making one for a verses with an otherwise not too interesting cosmology seems like not the ideal approach.

Another thing that could be mentioned uniquely in the power of the verse section are things like average power level of citizens or the numbers of armies which don't have faction profiles.

Also, I personally just like to have it to give a brief overview of the powers and stats.

So... yeah, I'm in favor of keeping it.
 
Back
Top