Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They aren't just wrong, they're literally made-up based on extremely vague statementsI agree with all of Eficiente's points. But I do also think that if those were fixed through a CRT there's likely still enough for a profile. If no-one wants to fix it I guess it could be deleted but I do hesitate since there's been a lot of work put into the profile, and we know exactly what to do to fix it. It's not an unknown character from an incredibly obscure verse that we can't fix, and it's not a new poorly-made profile, it just has some wrong abilities/sentences.
Ajimu and Barney showed some feats whatosever at very least, Gaster didn't.I'm not sure what things you care about. You list some vague reasons it's bad, I try getting other examples so we can actually dig through it, and you give me nothing by responding with "no those are bad too, false equivalence".
An actual character with extremely few confirmations which can't even be counted as worth to be here, is literally just an "unknown-stats" fest which is supported from almost just headcanons.Gaster is in a situation so much better than The Gentle Pull what the ****. Gaster's an actual character with many statements about him from multiple sources leading to a few plausible feats. TGP was not even a character and was mentioned once by one character.
So you admit that without these fake/wrong powers Gaster's profile would be a barebone one with like 3 abilities and Unknown stats everywhere. Is there an actual reason to keep Gaster at this point?At most there's one thing here that's "literally made-up", so I think me generally calling these "wrong" is fair.
Except that as 00potato said these characters showed waaaaaaaay more feats than Gaster, and Barney scales from some combat feats, so, again, the point?Ajimu and Barney have shown a handful of feats. Ajimu has no feats for 800 abilities we know the names/descriptions of, and quadrillions of abilities we don't. Barney's feats have no combat context to them. And Gaster does actually have statements about him.
God from Digimon was literally the same, and got nuked from this.Characters like that are allowed to stay, actually. We've had these sorts of conversations dozens of times.
Uhm, no? Axatotl was deleted just because it was just a page, and now characters based on just a statement are good? Seriously?I don't know anything about the Axolotl situation but I assume there was something more wrong with it than there is with Gaster/Amitabha.
Oh? I thought that it was because he showed extremely few showings. Nvm I guess.God from Digimon actually got removed as it was confirmed to be Yggdrasil, and so the page got merged or so.
No, God from Digimon is a different character from Yggdrasil, is just that the actual God is completely vague and featless since most mentions of God are actually Drasil, but that God is an actual character aside from Drasil is real.God from Digimon actually got removed as it was confirmed to be Yggdrasil, and so the page got merged or so.
God from Digimon is the supreme entity of the verse, and the statements we have of him give him a very solid 1-B rating. However, he's extremely filled with mystery since all his role is delegated to backstory and thus we don't really know about him beyond the creation lore of the series. Hence, he was deleted.God from Digimon was literally the same, and got nuked from this.
I don't know the situation with God/Axalotl.
Hey they're as valid as pages like this which people are opposed to deleting soEven if we actually rebuild it, it would be just Unknown about a character whose only confirmed feat is being a good scientist. Big Bang Theory profiles would nearly be on the same level as of now.
What the absolute ****. I never expected you to make an argument THIS disingenuous.Even if we actually rebuild it, it would be just Unknown about a character whose only confirmed feat is being a good scientist. Big Bang Theory profiles would nearly be on the same level as of now.
"Various haxxy abilities": name one which isn't theory.What the absolute ****. I never expected you to make an argument THIS disingenuous.
"A character with various haxxy abilities from a combat-oriented verse is the same as a featless comedy sitcom because LOL SCIENTISTS."
What the hell man?
You are completely ignoring a bunch of feats and even the fundamental standards by which we judge characters and verses on.
Did you remove his 2 fights too?I have done so.
Uh.NEP, Immortality, Possession/Duplication, Spatial Manip, Tech Manip.
I mean if he has confirmed abilities doesn’t matter if they’re hax or notUh.
They're either headcanons or not hax.
I say this because Agnaa called him a "haxxy character".I mean if he has confirmed abilities doesn’t matter if they’re hax or not
Spatial Manipulation isn't headcanon? I guess you have definite proof of sprite being Gaster, room being made by Gaster and its disappearance being Gaster's powers as well as being combat-usable like you said prior then.Also none of those are headcanon. No matter how many times you repeat a lie it never becomes true.