• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I mean evidently it was not popular on site as is
Also the verse page has all the remaining pages on it minus Webster who doesn't seem to have been on it to begin with
Okay. I will check.
 
Well, in the real world even champion fighters would have extremely great troubles with defeating around 5 reasonably trained people at the same time, if all of them were unarmed, and real world champion fighters are tier 9-C if I remember correctly.
That's not a matter of AP at all ._.
Either side can knock the other out if they land a solid hit, IRL people can't deal with 5 people at the same time well because we can't really defend properly against all attacks

So not only could they just be more skilled than said champions characters in question also have supernatural abilities which might just let them have an easier fight
Beating up multiple people without further context should not be assumed 9-C by default
 
Well, in the real world even champion fighters would have extremely great troubles with defeating around 5 reasonably trained people at the same time, if all of them were unarmed, and real world champion fighters are tier 9-C if I remember correctly.
  1. That can be overcome with superior skill, AP, or speed. Only one of those is needed. Assuming that it's due to AP despite no indication of that is nonsensical. Especially when the profile itself goes to great lengths about how skilled the character is.
  2. The profile in question does not actually say that those people were trained. Defeating multiple untrained, un-coordinated people would be much easier.
 
Okay. Never mind then, I suppose.
 
Anyways now that this has been cleared up can I delete the Darker Than Dark pages baring verse page and Hei?
 
I am not sure. Let's wait for further input from our staff and honorary staff.
 
Darker Than Black ones weren't even the thing contested here though, that was Kino
 
Well, in the real world even champion fighters would have extremely great troubles with defeating around 5 reasonably trained people at the same time, if all of them were unarmed, and real world champion fighters are tier 9-C if I remember correctly.
That's what I meant, yes. It's considered basically impossible to take on more than like, three people. There's reports of more happening of course but none fully reliable.
 
Okay. Thank you for helping out.
 
While I liked the series, I don't plan to work on it, I barely have time for my older verses to fix so sorry.
 
Both pages have multiple stats that just don't have any reasoning
So unless if @Naitez is willing to revise both pages they should be axed
I didn't make those profiles, so go ahead.
 
I feel that the page creator don't know FC/OC Wiki
 
I feel that the page creator don't know FC/OC Wiki
I deleted the page in question, and gave an instruction to its creator.

 
Should I start a staff thread for the credits section discussion?
 
Okay. I will handle it.
 
@Antvasima so can I start nuking the Darker Than Black and the two Blade Runner pages?
The Blade Runner pages seem fine to delete, but only the Darker than Black pages with guesswork statistics should probably be removed, not the ones with statistics based on accepted calculation blogs.
 
Asking for the deletion of Asuryan, Isha, Vaul, and Morai-Heg

No scans or references for the abilities or stats. On top of that, the abilities would also have to be reworked heavily anyways and if upcoming revisions get passed, the stats and justifications would have to be altered as well so they might as well be scrapped as the entire pages would have to be remade anyways.
 
Thank you for helping out.
Asking for the deletion of Asuryan, Isha, Vaul, and Morai-Heg

No scans or references for the abilities or stats. On top of that, the abilities would also have to be reworked heavily anyways and if upcoming revisions get passed, the stats and justifications would have to be altered as well so they might as well be scrapped as the entire pages would have to be remade anyways.
I have done so, but somebody needs to remove the links to the four deleted pages from all of the other regular wiki pages that link to them.
 
Thank you for helping out. It is appreciated.
 
Plain terrible. Also AP issues

Bad

bad

Bad. Also 9 appearances, tho fairly important. I could recreate it sometime, but definitely not any time soon
 
Last edited:
The grouping's good; there's only a few different works involved,
Far more potential for more stuff to be added, this is an irrelevant point to bring up.
and they all share commonalities in contributors,
Can everyone who lists themselves as a supporter confirm they're familiar with all the mythology ever? Or **** that, even the ones currently listed on the page?

It's a disingenuous representation.
One rule, which is general wiki rule.

Marvel and DC share powerscaling rules, they don't share a verse page, why are mythology files getting grouped together if they have no narrative cohesion, and the ONLY connecting link otherwise being their GENRE, not even character or property, entire genre of literature getting locked to a single page.
I think it'd be a detriment to split it up.
Exaggerating as all hell, a few verse pages don't impact the wiki in any way, and in fact we'll be able to gauge supporter pools more reliably this way.
 
Far more potential for more stuff to be added, this is an irrelevant point to bring up.

On the contrary, I think the possibility of 200 more pages being added if something to worry about once the page starts getting bloated, not when there's only 7.

Can everyone who lists themselves as a supporter confirm they're familiar with all the mythology ever?


Talking about page creators, not the supporter list.

One rule, which is general wiki rule.


A "general wiki rule" which only applies to and governs these sorts of pages.

Exaggerating as all hell.


"Detriment" is not an extreme word, y'know. It's pretty mild, actually.
 
Back
Top