• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Profile Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

Tiers, yes. But they aren't as bad as most other pages here. And if the supporters don't want to fix it, then sure
 
Megaraptor149 said:
Senshinkan

-This verse is too outdated
-There is only one userblog about the calculation for this verse
-There are only a two character profiles in this verse that have scan feats on their profiles
-Many supporters of this verse are no longer active or not interest to support this verse
Click to expand...
I agree with Confluctor, I dont think they quite deserve deletion yet but are definitely very outdated and need some reworks.
 
 
InfiniteDay said:
Summaries and plagiarized content can easily be changed.

Scans can also likely be found relatively easily enough.
Click to expand...

While it can, there are many profiles that are locked and can't be edited. In addition, they're pretty widely of extremely poor quality anyways, with missing abilities, powers, and poorly made sections.

The scans are also not as easy to find as you imply here. There are dozens of scans for each profile, and some of the profiles have no scans because they are exclusively Japanese characters at the moment and aren't in the English release.

Overall these profiles are of extremely poor quality, lacking scans, and outright plagiarized from the Type-Moon Wiki. They should be deleted.
 
For the "plagiarized" content, what I've taken from the wiki is literally their official description so I don't see the problem at using these parts for the skills and NP (I can still change them but most would be similar anyway). The summaries however I can easily change them while keeping the most important elements

For the scans, I need to know what I have to find and I'll search for them but this won't be easy honestly (lack of English translation)

For missing powers and abilities, I just need to know what's missing and I can add them, though I can't for locked profiles
 
Honestly? I don't see an issue with copying and pasting character summaries or whatnot. Or even notable attacks and stuff. There are no brownie points for coming up with original descriptions for everything. Why increase one's workload?
 
ArkhamDC06 said:
For the scans, I need to know what I have to find and I'll search for them but this won't be easy honestly (lack of English translation)
Click to expand...

There's been a CRT in the works for the Lostbelts as a whole, where we gathered scans for every ability.

For some context, Lostbelt 2 is 11 hours long when boiled down to just its cutscenes. Finding the scans and collecting them has been a massive undertaking for the people who are working on said CRT.
 
Confluctor said:
Honestly? I don't see an issue with copying and pasting character summaries or whatnot. Or even notable attacks and stuff. There are no brownie points for coming up with original descriptions for everything. Why increase one's workload?
Click to expand...

Because plagiarizing goes against wiki policy.

From the Editing Rules:

  • Please do not plagiarize from other wikis or online databases. It is unprofessional and shows a lack of effort on the part of the user. If you are getting your information from another wiki, please rephrase and summarize the passage in your own words instead of simply copying it.
Click to expand...
 
KnightOfSunlight said:
There's been a CRT in the works for the Lostbelts as a whole, where we gathered scans for every ability.

For some context, Lostbelt 2 is 11 hours long when boiled down to just its cutscenes. Finding the scans and collecting them has been a massive undertaking for the people who are working on said CRT.
Click to expand...
Didn't know such thread existed in the first place

For the record, Manaka and Merlin aren't about Lostbelts (doesn't change the problems from the profiles but still noteworthy)
 
Confluctor said:
I am aware of the rule, just pointing out that is bad
Click to expand...
Agreeing with this, not even for my personal case but in general, summaries can be rephrased but coping and pasting at least notable attacks shouldn't be a problem if they are good enough
 
Last edited:
Apex_Predator_GX said:
Can someone please delete the following profiles:

Godzilla, Mothra, Mechagodzilla, Battra, King Ghidorah, Rodan, SpaceGodzilla, Gigan, Biollante, Destroyah, Shinji Ikari, and Asuka

I'm the author of these profiles, but the reason behind this decision of mine is that these profiles belong to Crossover characters with no story relevance in Monster Strike.
Click to expand...
Will say that from what I'm seeing some pages do scale to stuff in the verse so you should change the reasoning there (Like this one https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Brahma_(Monster_Strike) )
 
Confluctor said:
Honestly? I don't see an issue with copying and pasting character summaries or whatnot. Or even notable attacks and stuff. There are no brownie points for coming up with original descriptions for everything. Why increase one's workload?
Click to expand...
ArkhamDC06 said:
Agreeing with this, not even for my personal case but in general, summaries can be rephrased but copying and pasting at least notable attacks shouldn't be a problem if they are good enough
Click to expand...
Well, I don't think that we should be overly strict to the point of deleting otherwise good profile pages for these sort of reasons, unless the cases are very extreme, but we should still try to discourage plagiarism unless it is necessary/very hard to avoid.
 
Confluctor said:
Anyway, the tiers seems a bit wonk, but they aren't deletion worthy IMO. Do they lack scans? Yes, but not all files lacks them. Although they are in another language. So that's something
Click to expand...
PsychoWarper said:
I agree with Confluctor, I dont think they quite deserve deletion yet but are definitely very outdated and need some reworks.
Click to expand...
Perhaps somebody should start a content revision thread and summon the currently active verse supporters to there?
 
Antvasima said:
Perhaps somebody should start a content revision thread and summon the currently active verse supporters to there?
Click to expand...
That is going to take a long while given the lack of active supporters and lack of translations for any of the verse material.
 
azontr said:
That is going to take a long while given the lack of active supporters and lack of translations for any of the verse material.
Click to expand...
There were quite a lot of supporters listed though.
 
Well, we could just send a notification to all of the ones who are currently active and see what happens at least.
 
I do not remember the conclusions by our staff and honorary staff members here in that regard.
 
Everything without a calc was agreed to be nuked, only 13 pages were found that actually had them
 
Confluctor said:
Honestly? I don't see an issue with copying and pasting character summaries or whatnot. Or even notable attacks and stuff. There are no brownie points for coming up with original descriptions for everything. Why increase one's workload?
Click to expand...
If one does find themselves needing to copy/paste a section, you should credit the place where you got it from. Most content on wikis (including ours) is under a license where you're allowed to copy it as long as you give credit.
 
Agnaa said:
If one does find themselves needing to copy/paste a section, you should credit the place where you got it from. Most content on wikis (including ours) is under a license where you're allowed to copy it as long as you give credit.
Click to expand...
How do we credit it? With a link somewhere or we mention the original stuff?
 
So just to be clear, what is the issue with the PC verse? If calculations exist and other characters scale to them, what makes those pages worse than the ones that performed the feats? Generally they're not very high quality but it doesn't seem inherently deletion-worthy.
 
Armorchompy said:
So just to be clear, what is the issue with the PC verse? If calculations exist and other characters scale to them, what makes those pages worse than the ones that performed the feats? Generally they're not very high quality but it doesn't seem inherently deletion-worthy.
Click to expand...
Only 12 of the pages actually scale to the calcs, the rest are as far as we can tell guesswork and based on questionable stuff
Also the only 2 supporters want it nuked

So only said 12 pages stay with the rest being in theory redone later
 
Agnaa said:
If one does find themselves needing to copy/paste a section, you should credit the place where you got it from. Most content on wikis (including ours) is under a license where you're allowed to copy it as long as you give credit.
Click to expand...
Credit texts at the bottom of such pages seems like a reasonable solution, yes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DivinumAeterna
Regarding the standards of Team Profiles
Replies
4
Views
577
DivinumAeterna
DivinumAeterna
Antvasima
  • Locked
Slightly adjusting our rules for bolded "powers and abilities" links
Replies
32
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Flashlight237
  • Locked
About The "Others" Section
2 3
Replies
84
Views
7K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Jinx666
'Continuity' Section for Verse Pages
Replies
37
Views
5K
Antvasima
Antvasima
DMUA
Removing Power of the Verse from Verse pages
2 3 4
Replies
147
Views
19K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top