- 5,826
- 1,233
Also, Qawsedf believed it to be a flat out Low 1-C rating if 5-D got accepted. And of course, most regular users seem to accept this idea as well,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uhm, thought it was decided at the end the intermediate between the 2 tiers, read bad then.Correct this here, DDM agreed with flat out Low 1-C.
Yep, because at least we're sure that the stats are on that level.Quick question though, do we have to edit the profiles with the proposed changes even though a Part II (which will discuss on adding more abilities, etc) will be out soon?
Correct this here, DDM agreed with flat out Low 1-C.
Okay.Also, Qawsedf believed it to be a flat out Low 1-C rating if 5-D got accepted. And of course, most regular users seem to accept this idea as well,
It has been a while yes, my new job has got me busy along with my free time being eaten up by D&D. But I'll try to pop in more often to the site.GreyFang being based as per usualIt truly has been a long time since we've last interacted with each other
Thank you for your viewpoints, much appreciated!
Don't think there's enough for an outright Low 1-C, but I'm totally ok with a "possibly" rating.
None of the other mods are interested in this thread unfortunately, and since DarkDragonMedeus is an EarthBound expert, his input is especially valuable. Antvasima also said that the mod input that we have so far is enough already. While I agree that more mod opinions would help the validity of the upgrades, we'll have to use what we have.How did this get accepted that quickly sure It looks good but most CRTs of this magnitude even with overwhelming evidence take at least 4 pages
Anyways I agree with Low 1-C
A little note, that people can't be "@" by normal users, but I believe Ant still saw your reply.Alright, I am awake now. Considering that two of the mods (one of which being DDM) and most regular users agree with a flat Low 1-C rating, and one mod only agrees with "possibly Low 1-C", what do you think should be done when the changes are applied to the profile? @Antvasima
It's eartbound, it's not a big franchise like sonic for instance which would instantly get attention(I mean serious, make Sonic thread and it would get attention at least after some hours). But also the work on this thread I feel was long and with amount of effort, to make it look good.How did this get accepted that quickly sure It looks good but most CRTs of this magnitude even with overwhelming evidence take at least 4 pages
Anyways I agree with Low 1-C
I figured, I just wanted to make absolutely sure that he knew my reply was directed at him.A little note, that people can't be "@" by normal users, but I believe Ant still saw your reply..
I am not sure. Would "likely Low 1-C" be an acceptable compromise?Alright, I am awake now. Considering that two of the mods (one of which being DDM) and most regular users agree with a flat Low 1-C rating, and one mod only agrees with "possibly Low 1-C", what do you think should be done when the changes are applied to the profile? @Antvasima
To quickly summarize the real world is not merely a meta 4th wall joke in Earthbound it is an objective real place that is consistently referred to through the player or it merely being called another world the player exists in all the Mother games. The Player is also consistently referred to and is the very reason you defeat Giygas in Mother 2, along with directly speaking to the Mother cast in Mother 3. Along with this Itoi in an interview states the Dark Dragon's total destruction would be an ending he can't write because it would've destroyed the real world too. The real world characters are massively beyond the EB characters with the player effortlessly defeating the most powerful character in Mother 2 Giygas, along with them consistently being stated to view the game world from the screen and being unable to have their physical form interact with the Mother reality, having to create an avatar to enter it, with the develoeprs of the game needing to do the same thing and entering the Mother reality via possessing a dog. So with this the Real World sees the game world as complete fiction and Truth exists beyond the game world and in the real world governing their system of fate and being unaffected by the dark dragon's reset, Ness obtains a portion of truth's power and Giygas is still above him which is the reason they both scale and only them in the game world, aside from Dark Dragon who directly could destroy the real world.Can somebody explain the reasons for Low 1-C to me please?
The player sees the game earthbound (which is 2-A) as a fictional. The Real World is a Canon part in the earthbound cosmology and since ToTU scales to the cosmology, it would be low 1-C. And since ness has a small fraction of it's power, Ness would be Low 1-C.Can somebody explain the reasons for Low 1-C to me please?
Ant, no offense, but the majority agreed with flat out Low 1-C and these 2 were already called here. I think that it has more than enough approval to get the upgrades aready.I am not certain.
@Ultima_Reality @DontTalkDT
Do you think that Low 1-C seems reasonable to apply here?
He doesnt actually get oneshotted by the player, he takes /43 direct shots from the player and even then Giygas had some amount of interference with the player and their player with it blocking the prayer to some amount, as seen with the entire name not being spelt out and well it seems like it is more of a consequence of Giygas being the embodiment of evil, since close to the end even ness' family and dog were doing a similar level of damage to the player. So i think it was more along the lines of due to Giygas being the embodiment of evil and Paula's prayer was basically ridding the world of what he was so his continued existence was getting damaged due to evil ceasing to be in the worldand he still gets oneshotted by the Player
Excellent. I can apply the changes now.I think that you can apply the accepted changes at least.
Yeah, that's kind of what I was saying. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear.I think that you can apply the accepted changes at least.
So what are we gonna do about Starman?Yeah, that's kind of what I was saying. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear.
Another request. Can we edit Starman's current page with everything that's on this this revised blog? The changes aren't controversial and is essentially a clean up of an unfinished profile