Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BlackeJan said:I don't think so about just having them in mid air like that. Jutsu happens the moment they finish their hand signs and alcapl out the name of their attack
That's true but in this case it is impossible for the meteor to not be from space it can not have been sitting in the atmosphere like what is being suggestedAnonymousBlank said:The author forgetting means nothing as whatever he forgot to include is not canon. That reasoning could be used for literally every meteor feat that doesn't show us the origin of the meteor.
no?Calaca Vs said:Let's not bring the moon since the Otsutsuki are supossed to be from there prior to Hagoromo.
Then, once more, stop complaining as that's how we already deal with meteor feats. Other feats with more backing for coming from space don't get any special treatment, so neither will this. Make a CRT to change how we deal with meteors or drop it, as you are getting nowhere with that.BlackeJan said:I like the fact though that y'all literally think it was just hanging in MID AIR like goodness the meteors just happened to be in the sky? while yes feats > assumption there's also something that can be common sense since it literally shows to be above cloud lvl
Here's the imagesLSirLancelotDuLacl said:@Qaw Doesn't it have the second meteor inside the first one only with some cracks? Then again if it's really so damaged not much that can be done.
We already know it's above the clouds last I saw, we see a hole being made in the clouds and it coming down. Issue is that even if we forget clouds can have different heights and that the anime is always treated as secondary canon, you are STILL deciding to ignore the other thing that doesn't make any sense at all - it's not ablated. Whatever you say or whatever you may feel, it's not. That can't be changed just because it couldn't have come from anywhere else, especially when that selective preference of details means the calc gets upgraded for no reason.BlackeJan said:@Lsir
+LSirLancelotDuLacl said:Though is there any reason to think it may still not be the same length from tip to top?