- 5,352
- 894
Inb4 kaguya returns in boruto and a star is confirmed to be existant in her dimension
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a decade is a long time kepKepekley23 said:I suppose this means yet another Discussion Rule must be removed, even if I disagree with this.
You guys are never going to get Tier 4 Kaguya, though.
Apparently that would sitill not count until we see her actually make the star because it is an outlier which I definitely understand.ShrekAlmighty said:Inb4 kaguya returns in boruto and a star is confirmed to be existant in her dimension
So this won't go through.Kepekley23 said:I actually agree with Matt that I'm obviously only giving in to stop you guys from bothering me about this.
I still disagree firmly with this.
No proof it's Light other than Guidebook. No proof it's not aim-dodging.ShrekAlmighty said:Why do u disagree
Annd none of those things are actually reasons to disagree with it.Matthew Schroeder said:The calc isn't a blog, isn't accepted, is based on a bunch of assumptions that the calcer doesn't agree with, and people acting like Naruto is already Relativistic.
He isn't.
I didn't whine when Saint Seiya Regen got downgraded from High to like Mid-Low or something. This isn't nearly as big a deal.Shadowbokunohero said:if Sub relativistic isnt legitimate then it should be removed, i don't want Naruto to be treated as a feel pitty verse, if it isn't sub rel or rel then it isn't
^Kepekley23 said:My calc still nitpicks the second sentence of the databook out of existence.
The databook literally states Light Fang's swings can't be evaded because they travel at the speed of light.
If Naruto dodged it, they are obviously wrong, and thus this passage is unreliable.
The Minato calc is as legitimate as it gets and the only thing up for debate here is Naruto dodging the light fang.Dark649 said:I'm sorry but i also have to disagree same for the Minato calc.
Not saying you were. I was saying I agree with your attitude.Shadowbokunohero said:I'm not whining tho, I'm stating that if none of the current speed feats arnt legitimate then it should be removed and downgraded
When? He said assumed timeframes are used and accepted in many calculations, iirc. Nobody even pushed for Sub-Relativistic based on Madara's feat in the revision thread. TataHakai just brought the feat up and explained why the former timeframe used was unreasonable.Matthew Schroeder said:Kep said he only accepted Sub-Relativistic because of people constantly wanting it, not out of legitimacy.
I never accused anyone of abusing power if not I would have said so. I said that we can not win against admins because you guys make the decisions and I gave up. And I have learnt to accept consensus since I believe Kaguya was 4-C a while ago. I am whiny and biased for stating my points and reasoning.. alright.Matthew Schroeder said:Rocker, can you stop being so whiny and biased? You are literally going the rabbit hole of accusing people disagreeing with you of abusing power.
Just to learn to accept a consensus. It is not favoring you.
Yeah and I am saying that I think they are sub rel and giving up on relavistic.Shadowbokunohero said:if Naruto characters arnt Sub Rel then they arnt, Kep shouldnt be forced to do things that are illogical just because some fans demand it