- 6,901
- 8,047
could it maybe work as a Possibly rating?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So your strange solution to this is:wow there is absulutly no prove that he was gona do that and just because he is good at a job doesnt mean he calculated that
You're blaming it on the limitations of the system rather than the obvious conclusion that he can't move as fast as the explosives.Also he wasnt moving exactly at the tandem of explosions thanks to the limits of SFM like it would requiere a absurd amount of job to make a character walks exactly at the same time the explosions were moving the point of the scene is that he was escaping from the explosions.
They do not, by the time he's jumped the explosion has already traveled outward farther than he has, and mid-jump you can clearly see it begin to dissipate.Again, look at there he jumps and just go frame by frame. You'll see his leg and explosion moving in tandem
Nowhere here does it state he moves faster than the explosion, just that he narrowly escapes it, which almost frames it as if he can't move faster than them because it was, again, a narrow escape.if my reasons dont convent you then THE LITERAL SCRIPT WILL no offense
There is no feat, only your unexplainable obsession with the intangible, and I'm failing to grasp as to why you are clinging to this when I had to spoon-feed the scene directly to you.Yep but that is speculation so the feat is valid
Why would we humor a possibly rating for something that's clearly not the case?could it maybe work as a Possibly rating?
I'm going to have to throw this back at you.i am sincerlly tired of people using mental gymnastics
Okay i am tired (in both senses) so my response is probally gona be bad and short so i will explain youI'm going to have to throw this back at you.
What we're assuming is that when someone runs down a hallway with explosions going off behind them intermittently, it probably isn't them moving at hypersonic speeds.
What you're assuming is that actually because the script says something that might suggest that he is outrunning the blasts obviously all of the frame by frame information that has been gathered is obviously invalidated and he absolutely must be moving at Hypersonic speeds, and that the whole scene is showing his sheer speed instead of his skills as a demolitions expert, in spite of a direct statement alluding to said fact directly after he does the run.
I don't even want to address the rest of it. Know that I absolutely disagree and I doubt I'll be changing my stance, unless something actually compelling is brought to light.
I never claimed you said he was a bad Demoman, if he was, he wouldn't be sitting there discussing it with us, now would he?dont straw man me i never said that he was a bad demoman (pun intended) i said that it was ridiculous that he know where the explosion was going to explode in the exact moment
Again, the engine limitations vs. the logical conclusion.No? the engine has his limit specially when it was not even in his final update at the time and it was pretty recent i am saying that he obviously escaped the explosions so he was moving faster that the explosions and why he cant move faster that the explosives? the gameplay no because that would be broke AF and would defeat soldier and demo class if the other classes could move faster that the explosions
I showed you the explosions going off with little movement on his part, they could have filled the corridor and he would have hardly moved at all.umm no? you were expecting to be perfectly close to the explosion at this point you are nitpicking and also how that even works if he is outrange of the explosion it doesnt scale to him (even if he would need to be faster that the explosion to escape it) and if he is inside he is slower that the explosion you are playing midground so whatever i say is incorrect.
I am not being aggressive with you, I'm painting the picture for you as objectively as possible and you continuously deny what's there, if anything I've been rather patient with you because I'm still here doing this back and forth.1. that tone of agresivity
2. isnt like i give examples or anything or i explain how your arguments were using the engine limitations
PD: when i am refering using engine limitations i am refering that the scene obviously tried to protayed as demoman escapling from a huge explosions wich couldnt be done because it would look weird of how the explosive was clipping from the building without any damage
You haven't debunked my argument and instead have given up excuses as to why the scene suits your narrative, such as the engine limitations, or gameplay would be "too skewed against him if the others could outrun the explosions" which only serves to counter what you claim.Because i debunked the entire argument of your? or maybe because is clearly that demoman was faster that the explosions and you are nitpicking to absurd levels to the point if demoman was 0.0001 away from the explosions everyone thinks that it would be wrong.
You are the one that is twisting the word "escape" to mean "he outran" which is something entirely different.anyway that should be do in another thread and not in this thread and i wouldnt be respoding today because i am sincerlly tired of people using mental gymnastics to excuse SOMETHING THE SCRIPTS SAY
Well, he was outside their range, but he's also not moving relative to them. I showed you that. Clear as day, in fact.Also you dont need to be in range with the explosions you only need to be moving relative with it so the discussion isnt about range is about relativity and how i probally cant win this because you can keep making several varitions of the same argument till i give up
And the frame-by-frame disagrees.He is moving relative to the explosions
I thought you debunked my argument already? So was it today, or is it going to be tomorrow? Or the day after that, and so on?I will debunk that tomorrow as i said before
The problem I'm having here is that Scout was still talking for a bit as this happened and Spy had the time to sit back down and respond to Scout before he noticed, so this could have transpired over a couple seconds at least, even if he had quick reflexes.I tried to update the spy calc a bit
i added the distance from hand to elbow to the total distance because i thought to properly stab somebody Spy would have to move at least that much
does that make sense or not really?
Him hardly being able to react is fine and all, but it's more that the guy was about to strike when Spy disarmed him and put it in his back, promptly sitting back down afterwards. Spy's a skilled assassin, so it's not out of his skillset.I mean, even not basing it on Scout noticing, the guy just being collapsed over where he was once standing implies he couldn't or could hardly react to Spy's attack.
Well no one agreed with each other and the discussion should be in a CRT anywayHaven't both of you already discussed this a lot?
Why people keep misundersting what i am saying. my point that he was outrunning the outcoming explosions not the explosions that it happened behind him if he was slower he would got caugth out by themYou already repeat the same things over and over that are rejected by literally everyone else in the thread. And everything is just assuming the highest possible interpretation that is heavily contradicted when someone actually looks at the cutscene and watches it frame by frame.
and also they debunked my points... that wasnt even my point because they didnt read what i say at the begining of the series and assumed that my point that he outrunned the present explosions my point that he outrunned the incoming explosions moving fast enough to not be caugthYou already repeat the same things over and over that are rejected by literally everyone else in the thread. And everything is just assuming the highest possible interpretation that is heavily contradicted when someone actually looks at the cutscene and watches it frame by frame.
They dont agree with itI think that we can go ahead with what Abstractions and Medeus decided here.
That would be stacking, and it was not as if Scout was trying to react to what happened because he was talking out loud and focused on something else.Scout has subsonic to subsonic+ reactions though, wouldn't that affect the feat?
He didn't outrun explosions, that's self-evident.aka: my point it that he outrunned the several explosions not the explosions
he outrunned the incoming explosionsThat would be stacking, and it was not as if Scout was trying to react to what happened because he was talking out loud and focused on something else.
He didn't outrun explosions, that's self-evident.
The entire thread disagrees with you. You have the frame by frame fully explained to you...he outrunned the incoming explosions
i alredy explained that he outrunned the incoming explosions not the explosions (yes that is confusing my english sucks) but yeah this cant get done till i get more proves till thenThe entire thread disagrees with you. You have the frame by frame fully explained to you...
The explosives are no longer expanding from their ignition, they are dying down to where only the flames remain.Oops, images are in wrong order. But basically, here's some clear in tandem movement
It was already, I was just waiting on what should have been done with BONK! and the Spy calc.The consensus here should be applied at this point.